Influence of the suspension system on the accuracy of the aircraft modal testing results


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Modal testing is an efficient tool for checking and updating of computational dynamic models of aircraft. Test objects are fixed by special elastic suspension systems during the modal testing time. Stiffness characteristics of such systems are determined on the assumption that the impact of the suspension on the eigentones of elastic vibrations of a freely flying aircraft should not exceed the pre-arranged level. It is therefore considered that the vibration frequency of the structure as a rigid body on the suspension should be several times lower than the natural frequency of the first flexible mode. Besides, different sources recommend various ratios between these frequencies. As to the modal testing of large flexible space structures, the task of creating such a suspension becomes many times more difficult because such structures can have very low natural frequencies of flexible modes. The influence of the suspension system on the accuracy of the aircraft modal testing results manifests itself in two ways. On the one hand, the use of the suspension leads to an increase of all natural frequencies of the test object. On the other hand, the occurrence of modes of the object as a rigid body with non-zero frequencies leads to the aircraft phase resonance frequency shifts which determine the natural frequencies of flexible mode tones. The paper presents a technique for correcting an aircraft computational dynamic model taking into account the suspension system. The correction is based on the fact that the errors in measurement of displacements in modal tests (i.e. eigenmodes as well) are greater than the errors in determining natural frequencies by more than an order of magnitude. The effect of modes of an object as a rigid body on an elastic suspension system on the accuracy of determination of its natural frequencies, generalized masses and generalized damping factors of flexible modes is analyzed.

About the authors

V. A. Berns

Siberian Aeronautical Research Institute named after S.A. Chaplygin, Novosibirsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.berns@yandex.ru

Doctor of Science (Engineering), Assistant Professor
Head of Department

Russian Federation

A. V. Dolgopolov

Federal State Unitary Enterprise Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute named after N.E. Zhukovsky, Zhukovsky

Email: dolganton@yandex.ru

Junior Research Assistant

Russian Federation

E. P. Zhukov

Siberian Aeronautical Research Institute named after S.A. Chaplygin, Novosibirsk

Email: zh-ep@yandex.ru

Engineer

Russian Federation

D. A. Marinin

Joint Stock Company «Acade-mician M. F. Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems, Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Region

Email: marinin_dmitry@mail.ru

Head of Department

Russian Federation

References

  1. Mezhin V.S., Obukhov V.V. The practice of using modal tests to verify finite element models of rocket and space hardware. Space Engineering and Technology. 2014. No. 1(4). P. 86-91. (In Russ.)
  2. Narizhny A.G., Smyslov V.I., Sychev V.I. Aeroelastic stability research of a cross-shaped flying vehicle. TsAGI Science Journal. 2013. V. 44, Iss. 6. P. 885-909. doi: 10.1615/tsagiscij.2014011150
  3. Heylen W., Lammens S., Sas P. Modal Analysis Theory and Testing. 2nd ed. Leuven, Belgium, Catholic University Leuven, 1997. 340 p.
  4. Böswald M., Govers Y., Vollan A., Basien M. Solar Impulse – How to validate the numerical model of a superlight aircraft with A340 dimensions! Proceedings of ISMA 2010 – International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering. Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2010. P. 2451-2466.
  5. Peres M.A., Bono R.W., Brown D.L. Practical Aspects of Shaker Measurements for Modal Testing. Proceedings of ISMA 2010 – International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, including USD 2010. Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2010. P. 2539-2550.
  6. Karkle P.G., Malyutin V.A., Mamedov O.S., Popovskiy V.N., Smotrov A.V., Smyslov V.I. About modern methods of ground testing of aircraft in aeroelasticity. Trudy TsAGI. 2012. Iss. 2708. 34 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Mikishev G.N., Rabinovich B.I. Dinamika tonkostennykh konstruktsiy s otsekami, soderzhashchimi zhidkost' [Dynamics of thin-walled structures with compartments containing liquid]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie Publ., 1971. 564 p.
  8. Kononenko V.O., Plakhtienko N.P. Metody identifikatsii mekhanicheskikh nelineynykh kolebatel'nykh sistem [Methods of identification of mechanical nonlinear vibrating systems]. Kiev: Naukova dumka Publ., 1976. 114 p.
  9. Berns V.A. Modal identification of the dynamic systems on the basis of monophasic vibrations. Science Bulletin of NSTU. 2010. No. 3 (40). P. 99-109. (In Russ.)
  10. Berns V.A. Errors in the Definition of Eigen Tones Characteristics in Close Natural Frequencies. Testing. Diagnostics. 2011. No. 3(153). P. 12-16. (In Russ.)
  11. Berns V.A. Assessment of determination accuracy of eigentones characteristics in the presence of random errors in the experimental data. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universitetaimeni akademika M. F. Reshetneva. 2010. No. 5(31). P. 208-212. (In Russ.)
  12. Zharov E.A., Smyslov V.I. The accuracy of determining the vibrational characteristics of the elastic structure when the resonant test with multi-point excitation. TsAGI Science Journal. 1976. V. 7, no. 5. P. 88-97. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 VESTNIK of the Samara State Aerospace University

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies