Nonparaxial iterative calculation of diffractive optical elements focusing in a subwave light spot

Abstract

The main efforts in overcoming the diffraction limit have been recently concentrated on the use of damped waves. The implementation, however, is connected with a serious drawback: superresolution is attained only in the immediate vicinity of the device, namely, at a distance of less than the wavelength. It is, therefore, impossible to use the available results, in particular, to reduce information on optical media. The aim of the paper is calculation of optical elements for subwave focusing of a monochromatic wave at a distance of several dozens of wave lengths. The problem of overcoming the diffraction limit expressed in accordance with the Abby theory and the Raleigh criterion dealt with in multiple fundamental and applied investigations is discussed in the paper. The analysis of subwavelength localization of radiation based on the interference effect that makes it possible to reduce the sizes of a light spot due to redistribution of energy in the peripheral area holds a prominent place in the paper. Calculations are performed using the iterative algorithm based on the method of plane wave expansion and the method of main directions. The problem is considered for the cylindrical and radial cases. Special attention is given to the search of solutions that would be more convenient for practical implementation. Prospective viability of developing the solution of the problem for data storage, contactless probing and nanolithography is demonstrated.

About the authors

E. Y. Bogdanova

Samara State Aerospace University

Author for correspondence.
Email: fwinter@yandex.ru

Student in the Master’s programme, Department of Engineering Cybernetics

Russian Federation

S. N. Khonina

Samara State Aerospace University

Email: khonina@smr.ru

Doctor of Science (Physics and Mathematics)

Professor of the Department of Engineering Cybernetics

Russian Federation

References

  1. Betzig E., Trautman J.K., Harris T.D., Weiner J.S., Kostelak R.L. Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Optical Microscopy on a Nanometer Scale // Science. 1991. Vol. 251. P. 1468–1470. doi: 10.1126/science.251.5000.1468
  2. Hartschuh A., Sanchez E.J., Xie X.S., Novotny L. High-Resolution Near-Field Raman Microscopy of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes // Physical Review Letters. 2003. Vol. 90. P. 701-704. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.90.095503
  3. Hell S.W., Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy // Optics Letters. 1994. No. 19. P. 780–782. doi: 10.1364/ol.19.000780
  4. Khonina S.N., Golub I. How low can STED gо Comparison of different writeerase beam combinations for stimulated emission depletion microscopy // Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2012. V. 29, no. 10. P. 2242-2246. doi: 10.1364/josaa.29.002242
  5. Li K., Stockman M. I., Bergman D.J. Self-Similar Chain of Metal Nanospheres as an Efficient Nanolens // Physical Review Letters. 2003. No. 91. P. 599-603. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.91.227402
  6. Stockman M.I. Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides // Physical Review Letters. 2004. No. 93. P. 137404. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.137404
  7. Merlin R. Near-field plates: subwavelength focusing and radiationless interference // Science. 2008. V. 320. P. 511-513. doi: 10.1126/science.1154753
  8. Pendry J.B. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens // Physical Review Letters. 2000. No. 85. P. 3966–3969. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.85.3966
  9. Salandrino A., Engheta N. Far-field subdiffraction optical microscopy using metamaterial crystals: Theory and simulations // Physical Review B. 2006. No. 74. P. 205436. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.74.075103
  10. Jacob Z., Alekseyev L.V., Narimanov E. Optical hyperlens: far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit // Optics Express. 2006. No. 14. P. 8247–8256. doi: 10.1364/oe.14.008247
  11. Fang N., Lee H., Sun C., Zhang X., Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens // Science. 2005. V. 308. P. 534–537. doi: 10.1126/science.1108759
  12. Liu Z., Lee H., Xiong Y., Sun C., Zhang X. Far-field optical hyperlens magni-fying sub-diffraction-limited objects // Sci-ence. 2007. V. 315. P. 1686. doi: 10.1126/science.1137368
  13. Huang Fu Min. Super-Resolution without Evanescent Waves // Nano Letters. 2009. V. 9, no. 3. P. 1249-1254. doi: 10.1021/nl9002014
  14. Merlin R. Radiationless Electromagnetic Interference: Evanescent-Field Lenses and Perfect Focusing // Science. 2007. V. 317. P. 927-929. doi: 10.1126/science.1143884
  15. Fang N. Sub-Diffraction-Limited Optical Imaging with a Silver Superlens // Science. 2005. V. 308. P. 534-537. doi: 10.1126/science.1108759
  16. Toraldo di Francia G. Super-gain antennas and optical resolving power // Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 1952. V. 9. P. 426–427. doi: 10.1007/bf02903413
  17. Khonina S.N., Golub I. Enlightening darkness to diffraction limit and beyond: comparison and optimization of different polarizations for dark spot generation // Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2012.V. 29, no. 7. P. 1470-1474. doi: 10.1364/josaa.29.001470
  18. Khonina S.N., Volotovskiy S.G. Minimizing the bright/shadow focal spot size with controlled side-lobe increase in high-numerical-aperture focusing systems // Advances in Optical Technologies. 2013. Article number 267684. doi: 10.1155/2013/267684
  19. Brent R.P. Algorithms for minimization without derivatives // Prentice-Hall. 1973. P. 195.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 VESTNIK of the Samara State Aerospace University

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies