ON SITUATIONAL IRONY IN ENGLISH LITERARY DISCOURSE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the insufficient development of the issues associated with the analysis of situational irony. In the present study, the objective of the study is to identify the linguistic features of the ironical mode of literary discourse in accordance with the idea of situational irony as mode of literary discourse. In accordance with this goal, the work sets the following tasks: 1) to consider approaches to the analysis of situational irony in modern linguistics; 2) to explore the characteristic features of ironic situations; 3) to consider the types of situational irony in English short stories. The analysis of language material is carried out by means of genre approach, pragmalinguistic and stylistic methods of research. In this study, the principle of organizing a short story is based on the classification of events by J. Lucariello, which represents 7 types of ironical script. The principle of organizing a story is based on a certain discrepancy of an ironical script with the generally accepted script. The classification of ironical events by J. Lucariello, therefore, can rather be called the classification of violations or deviations. Ironic schemes are activated when some combination of the following four characteristics is found in a situation: unexpectedness, human frailty, outcome, and opposition.
The analysis of the material showed that the imbalances script is most frequently used, viz. such subtypes as temporal, contextual imbalances and role reversal. The stories abound in emotional lexis, lexical repetition, syntactic parallelism and indirect politeness strategies. They are designed to create an ironic effect, thereby involving the reader in the dialogue with the author. In addition, by way of situational irony the writer conveys a certain moral message to the reader. These linguistic features of short stories characterize them as a sample of the ironical mode of literary discourse.

About the authors

N. L. Ovshieva

Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

Candidate of Philological Sciences, associate professor of the Department of Germanic Philology

M. S. Poshtanova

Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov

Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1381-6992

a 4th year undergraduate student in the direction of training (specialty) 45.03.01 Philology. Profile «Foreign Philology (English and German Languages and Literature)»

References

  1. Booth 1974 – Booth W.C. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1974, 292 p. Available at:
  2. https://uwaterloo.ca/wayne-booths-rhetorology/works-and-about-booth/wayne-c-booth-rhetoric-irony-1974' target='_blank'>https://uwaterloo.ca/wayne-booths-rhetorology/works-and-about-booth/wayne-c-booth-rhetoric-irony-1974'>https://uwaterloo.ca/wayne-booths-rhetorology/works-and-about-booth/wayne-c-booth-rhetoric-irony-1974
  3. [in English].
  4. Brown, Levinson 1987 – Brown P., Levinson S.C. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics; 4. Gen Ed. John J. Gumperz. Cambridge University Press, 1987, 345 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813085' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085'>10.1017/CBO9780511813085.
  5. Colston, Gibbs 2007 – Colston H.L. and R.W. Gibbs, Jr. A Brief History of Irony. In: Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. Ed. by H.L. Colston and R.W. Gibbs Jr. New York, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007, pp. 3–21. Available at: http://bookre.org/reader?file=1208494' target='_blank'>http://bookre.org/reader?file=1208494'>http://bookre.org/reader?file=1208494 [in English].
  6. Easthope 1997 – Easthope A. Culture and Nation: Englishness. In: Cultural Learning: Language Learning. Selected Papers from the Second British Studies Conference. Prague 18–20 October 1996. Ed. by S. Bassnett and M. Prochazka. Perspectives Litteraria Pragensia. Prague, 1997, pp. 13–26 [in English].
  7. Elleström 2002 – Elleström L. Divine Madness: On Interpreting Literature, Music and the Visual Arts. Bucknell University Press, 2002. 307 p. [in English].
  8. Grant, Oswick, Hardy, Putman, Philips 2004 – Grant D., Oswick C., Hardy C., Putnam L.L. and N. Phillips (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse. Sage Publications Ltd, 2004, 448 p. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608122.n1' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.n1'>10.4135/9781848608122.n1 [in English].
  9. Grice 1969 – Grice H. Utterer’s Meaning and Intention. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 78, no. 2 (Apr., 1969), pp. 147–177. DOI: 10.2307/2184179' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.2307/2184179'>10.2307/2184179 [in English].
  10. Hutcheon 1995 – Hutcheon L. Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. London; New York: Routledge, 1995, 248 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203359259' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359259'>10.4324/9780203359259 [in English].
  11. Leech 1983 – Leech G.N. Principles of pragmatics. London, New York, 1983, 257 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315835976' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976'>10.4324/9781315835976 [in English].
  12. Littman, Mey 1991 – Littman D., & J. Mey. The nature of irony: Toward a computational model of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 1991, Vol. 15, pp. 131–151. DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(91)90057-5' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90057-5'>10.1016/0378-2166(91)90057-5 [in English].
  13. Lucariello 2007 – Lucariello J. Situational Irony: A Concept of Events Gone Awry. In: Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. Ed. by H.L. Colston and R.W. Gibbs Jr. New York, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007, pp. 467–497. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.129' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.129'>10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.129 [in English].
  14. Muecke 1969 – Muecke D.C. The compass of irony. London: Methuen, 1969. 276 p. Available at: https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/38225/1/09lim945.pdf' target='_blank'>https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/38225/1/09lim945.pdf'>https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/38225/1/09lim945.pdf [in English].
  15. Muecke 1970 – Muecke D.C. Irony (Critical Idiom). Methuen Publishing Ltd, 1970, 92 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315388342' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315388342'>10.4324/9781315388342 [in English].
  16. Schank, Abelson 1977 – Schank R.C., and Robert P. Abelson. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977, 248 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203781036' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781036'>10.4324/9780203781036 [in English].
  17. Shelley 2007 – Shelley C. The bicoherence theory of situational irony. In: Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. Ed. by H.L. Colston and R.W. Gibbs Jr. New York, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007, pp. 531–578. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2505_7' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2505_7'>10.1207/s15516709cog2505_7
  18. [in English].
  19. Turner 2015 – Turner K.L. This Is the Sound of Irony. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2015, 270 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315551074' target='_blank'>http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315551074'>10.4324/9781315551074 [in English].
  20. Searle 1986 – Searle J.R. Kosvennye rechevye akty. Perevod s angl. N.V. Pertsova [Indirect speech acts. Translation from English by N.V. Pertsov]. In: Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevykh aktov [New in foreign linguistics. Issue XVII. Theory of speech acts]. M.: Progress, 1986, рр. 195-222. Available at: https://classes.ru/grammar/159.new-in-linguistics-17/source/worddocuments/_5.htm' target='_blank'>https://classes.ru/grammar/159.new-in-linguistics-17/source/worddocuments/_5.htm'>https://classes.ru/grammar/159.new-in-linguistics-17/source/worddocuments/_5.htm [In Russian].
  21. Soboleva 2018 – Soboleva I.A. Funktsional''nyi potentsial IRONII V SOVREMENNOM MEDIADISKURSE [Functional Potential of Irony in Modern Media Discourse]. Diskurs-Pi [Discourse-P], 2018, no. 3–4 (32–33), pp. 44–49. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/funktsionalnyy-potentsial-ironii-v-sovremennom-mediadiskurse' target='_blank'>https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/funktsionalnyy-potentsial-ironii-v-sovremennom-mediadiskurse'>https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/funktsionalnyy-potentsial-ironii-v-sovremennom-mediadiskurse [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Ovshieva N.L., Poshtanova M.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies