How knowledge becomes a technical object: epistemic practices in information technology


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article analyzes the practices of production and improving the efficiency of technical knowledge. The field of information technologies was chosen as the base of research. A distinctive feature of the modern stage of development of technology is that knowledge itself becomes a technical object. The requirements of efficiency, high performance, security are beginning to apply to knowledge itself. The author’s concept of epistemic practices is used as a methodological basis for the present study. Epistemic practices are defined as methods and techniques for working with technical objects, the result of which is to increase the efficiency of technical knowledge implemented into these objects. The high level of competition and the direct dependence of the profits of IT companies on the efficiency of knowledge production makes the information technology industry a kind of “testing ground” for the production of epistemic practices. It has been proved that epistemic practices in the field of information technology are the forms of knowledge representation in information systems, the selection of data visualization methods, the improvement of multifactorial mathematical models and the determination of the hardware load configuration. It is concluded that the production of epistemic practices is a condition for the competitiveness of IT companies operating in the sphere of high technologies.

About the authors

Natalya A. Yastreb

Vologda State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nayastreb@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6635-6008
http://nayastreb.tilda.ws/

Dr. phil. habil., Associate Professor

https://vogu35.ru/

https://iif.vogu35.ru/institut/kontakti/

Author ID (РИНЦ) 617517

15, Lenina St., Vologda, 160035, Russian Federation

References

  1. Brey, P. (1996), Philosophy of technology: a time for maturation, metascience: an international review journal for the history, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science, vol. 9, pp. 91–104.
  2. Jarvie, I.C. (1972), Technology and the structure of knowledge, philosophy and technology. Readings in the philosophical problems of technology, C. Mitcham and R.C. Mackey, eds., The Free Press, pp. 54–61.
  3. Bone, J. (2012), The social sciences and the web: From «lurking» to interdisciplinary «big data» research, Methodological innovations, vol. 9, pp. 1–14.
  4. Etzkowitz, H. (1995), The triple helix–university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development, EASST Review, vol. 14, pp. 14–19.
  5. Floridi, L. (2012), Big data and their epistemological challenge, Philosophy &. Technology, vol. 25, pp. 435–437.
  6. James, W. (1975), The Works of William James, vol. 1, Ed. by F.H. Burkhardt, F. Bowers, I.K. Skrupskelis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  7. Minsky, M. (1974), А framework for representing knowledge, The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston (ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  8. Russo, F. (2018), Digital technologies, ethical questions, and the need of an informational framework, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 31, pp. 655–667.
  9. Semantic networks in artificial intelligence (1992), Lehmann F., Rodin E.Y., eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York.
  10. Baryshnikov, P.N. (2021), Computational philosophy in search of boundaries between object and method, Philosophy of Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 47–50.
  11. How Yandex search works: what is impossible to read about, [Online], available at: https://youtu.be/BCVsgup8hUQ (Accessed 18 December 2021).
  12. Mikeshina, L.A. (2002), Philosophy of knowledge. Polemic chapters, Progress-Tradiciya, Moscow, Russia.
  13. Nesterov, A.Y. (2017), Semiotic foundations of technology and technical consciousness, Izdatel'stvo Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii, Samara, Russia.
  14. The latest philosophical dictionary (2003), A.A. Gricanov (ed.), Interpresservis, Knizhnyj Dom, Minsk, Belarus.
  15. Cheshev, V.V. (2006), Technical knowledge, Izdatel’stvo Tom. gos. arhit.-stroit. un-ta, Tomsk, Russia.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Yastreb N.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies