Polical and cultural significance of conflicts over the orthodox symbolization of public urban space in the context of depoliticization

Cite item


This article presents the results of a study of two of the most striking conflicts: the transfer of St. Isaac’s Cathedral to the Russian Orthodox Church and the construction of the Church of St. Catherine in Yekaterinburg. In these clashes over attempts to change or redefine the public urban space, a hybrid of “the religious” and “the political” is quite new for a Russian researcher. So, despite the presence of Orthodox public actions, these conflicts cannot be fully called religious, while the peripheral nature of the domestic political agenda makes it difficult to call them political. In this regard, the study of these conflicts requires a special methodological setting (orientation). Thanks to the theory of social performance by J. Alexander, it becomes obvious that the conflict of meanings within these confrontations gives access to the study of display of modern political culture. Guided by his methodology and using the approach to the analysis of the discourse of D. Snow and his colleagues, in the present research, carried out by the author, there have been analyzed the discourses of the two sides of the confrontation in online media publications concerning two indicated conflicts.

About the authors

Andrei Yu. Shvaya

Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: andrewshvaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0948-4246

Junior research associate of the authorities’ sociology and the civil society sector,

Russian Federation, 57/43, Sredniy Prospekt of Vasilyevsky Island, Saint Petersburg, 199178, Russian Federation


  1. Golovin, N.A., Klebanov, A.A., Sibirev, V.A. (2018), Social networks in a bid for the decision to transfer Saint Isaac’s Cathedral to the Russian Orthodox Church (January-June 2017), Monitoring, no. 1 (143), pp. 296–317.
  2. Efremova, V.N. (2014), State holidays as instruments of semiotic policy: possibilities of theoretic description, Semiotic policy: Collection of scholarly works, Russian Academy of Sciences. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Centre for social-scientific and scientific-informational researches. Department of the political science. Editorial board: Malinova O.Yu., chief editor and others, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Zhuravlev, O. (2015), Persistency of post-Soviet depoliticization and politization of 2011-2012. Politics of the nonpolitical: civil movements in Russia of 2011-2013 years, Multi-authored monograph, Aliukov M.L., Erpyleva S.V., Zhelnina A.A., Zhuravlev O.M., Zavadskaya M.A., Kleman K., Magun A.V., Matveev I.A., Nevskiy A.V., Saveleieva N.V., Turovets M.V., editors: Erpyleva S.V., Magun A.V., Novoye Literaturnoye Obozreniye Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  4. Zavershinskiy, K.F. (2015), Political myth in the symbolic practicas of the authorities’ communications: theoretical explication, Semiotic policy: Collection of scholarly works, Russian Academy of Sciences. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences. Centre for social-scientific and scientific-informational researches. Department of the political science, Editorial board: Malinova O.Yu., chief editor and others, Moscow, Russia.
  5. Kleman, K., Miriasova, O., Demidov, A. (2010), From philistines to volunteers. The beginning of the social movements in modern Russia, Tri Kvadrata Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  6. Kormina, Zh.V. and Shtyrkov, S.A. (2015), “That is our Russian-specific, and there is no way round it”: prehistory of post-Soviet desecularization, The invention of religion: desecularization in post-Soviet context under the editorship of Kormina Zh.V., Panchenko A.A., Shtyrkov S.A., European University in Saint Petersburg Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, pp. 7–45.
  7. Malinova, O.Yu. (2013), The problem of the politically “natural” past and evolution of the official semiotic policy in post-Soviet Russia, Political conceptology. Rostov-on-Don, no. 1, pp. 114–130.
  8. Mitrokhin, N.A. (2004), Russian Orthodox Church: modern state and actual problems, Novoye Literaturnoye Obozreniye, Moscow, Russia.
  9. Olick, J. (2012), Figuration of memory: a process-relational methodology illustrated on the German case, Sociological Review (Sociologicheskoye obozrniye), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 40–74.
  10. Pachenkov, O. (2012), Public space of a city in the face of challenges of modernity: mobility and publicity overindulgence, Reserve Funds (Neprikosnovennyj Zapas), no. 117, [Online], available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2012/117/p33.html (Accessed 12 Apr 2019).
  11. Urry, J. (2012), Mobilities. Translated from English by English by Lazareva A.V., Editorial and consulting group “Praksis”, Moscow, Russia.
  12. Ukhvatova, M.V. (2018), “Farewell words of the guardians”: Religious rhetoric during the inauguration of the Region Heads in Russia, Politics: Analysis, Chronicles. Forecast (Magazine of the Political Philosophy and Politics’ Sociology), no. 2, pp. 84–101.
  13. Filatov, S.B. (1994), Russian Orthodox Church and political establishment, Religion and Politics in post-communist Russia, Moscow, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 99–118.
  14. Alexander, J.C. (2006), Сultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy, Social Performance Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, ed. by Jeffrey C. Alexander Bernhard Giesen Jason L. Mast. Cambridge University Press, pp. 5, 33, 51–52.
  15. Baiocchi, G., Cordner, A., Bennett, E., Klein, P., Savell, S. (2013), Disavoiwing Politics: Civic engagements in an Era of Political Skepticism, The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 119, pp. 518–548.
  16. Eliasoph, N. (1997), Close to Home: The work of avoiding politics, Theory and Society, no. 26, pp. 605–647.
  17. Fischer, J. (2004), Religious Rhetoric in US Presidential Inaugural Addresses: A Meta-Analysis, Emergence: A Journal of Undergraduate Literary Criticism and Creative Research, no. 4, pp. 20–34.
  18. Giesen, B. (2014), Cultural Trauma and Religious Identity, Oxford Handbooks Online, [Online], available at: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935420.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935420-e-001?rskey=1b42tK&result=2 (Accessed 1 October 2021).
  19. Hunter, J.D. (2009), The Culture War and the Sacred/Secular Divide: The Problem of Pluralism and Weak Hegemony, Social research. The Religious-Secular Divide: The U.S Case, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1307–1322.
  20. Papkova, I.A. (2009), «Contentious Conversation: Framing the „Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture“ in Russia», Religion, State & Society, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 291–309.
  21. Roche, M.A. (2015), Rhetoric, Religion, and Representatives: The Use of God in Presidential Inaugural Addresses from 1933 to 2009 as Reflections of Trends in American Religiosity. Ph.D. diss, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

Copyright (c) 2022 Shvaya A.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies