Reflexive discourse of project activities: after intercultural project «Rilke and Russia»

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The intercultural project was executed by the German department of Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education together with colleges from the Ludwigsburg Pedagogical Institute (Germany). We have realized the Project in two directions: as a compact seminar for German and Russian students and as professional development for Russian teachers of German. In the paper I analyze a new research subject: the arts of reflective discourse during activities in foreign language. I observe two arts of reflective discourse: one of them is setting perspective and another one gives reflectional estimate. I develop the conception of role subject in the intercultural discourse. The main consideration is given to criterions that distinguish discourse analyze from text analyze, that are categories of subject and its role status and relationship between discourse formations. In discourse formations I find out conceptual dominants that I determine by the frequency of their representants. I also find out language expressional reflecting means by Russian and German role subjects and compare estimating utterances from the viewpoint of intercultural differences. As research material I use hand made notes of oral utterances done by role subjects (moderators and learners) to set perspective or to give reflectional estimate as well as 28 written reflectional texts of students and teachers. The findings of my research show distinctive features of reflectional discourse in intercultural project activities: their direction to own activities and to activities of learners; broadening of learner’s activities who form recipient’s expectations in perception of project products; implicit retrospective character of prospective discourse formations that summarize preliminary work concerning the project; the possibility of written hold of estimated opinions and of comparison of their content and language appearance in discourse formations; dominant estimating concepts of intercultural project by role subjects.

 

About the authors

O. A. Kostrova

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, Samara, Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

Doctor of Philological Sciences, professor, head of the Department of German Language, Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

References

  1. Kostrova, Tarasova 2014 – Kostrova O.A., Tarasova E.V. Schriftliche Arbeiten deutscher und russischer Studierender. In: Interkulturalität unter dem Blickwinkel von Semantik und Pragmatik (= Beiträge zur interkulturellen Germanistik, Bd. 5). Hrsg. von C. Földes. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verl., 2014. S. 93–108.
  2. Bizyaeva 2004 – Bizyaeva A.A. (2004) Psychology of a thinking teacher. Pskov: PGPI im. S.M. Kirova, 216 p. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1096556. (In Russ.)
  3. Boldyrev, Grigorieva 2018 – Boldyrev N.N., Grigorieva V.S. Cognitive dominants of speech interaction. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 4 (57), pp. 15–24. doi: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-4-15-24. (In Russ.)
  4. Danilova 2019 – Danilova N.K. (2019) Intentional networks of discourse. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia, pedagogika, filologiia = Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 134–139. doi: 10.18287/2542-0445-2019-25-4-134-139. (In Russ.)
  5. Karasik 2002 – Karasik V.I. (2002) Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 477 p. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1806336 (In Russ.)
  6. Kostrova 2009 – Kostrova O.A. (2009) Text and discourse: borders and crossings. In: Russian German studies: Annual of the Russian German studies alliance. Vol. 6: Borders in language, literature and science. Мoscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, pp. 348–355. Available at: http://www.bibliorossica.com/book.html?currBookId=1117. (In Russ.)
  7. Nyubina 2000 – Nyubina L.M. (2000) Recollection and text: monograph. Smolensk: Smolenskii gos. ped. un-t, 161 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Olyanich, Kopylova 2015 – Olyanich A.V., Kopylova V.V. Linguistic didactic discourse. Discourse-P, no. 3–4 (20–21), pp. 155–157. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvodidakticheskiy-diskurs; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25470120. (In Russ.)
  9. Tkach 2007 – Tkach E. (2007) Reflective discourse as pedagogical phenomenon. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, vol. 7, pp. 171–173. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/refleksivnyy-diskurs-kak-pedagogicheskiy-fenomen; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9579274. (In Russ.)
  10. Uman, Kudinova 2011 – Uman A.I., Kudinova N.A. (2011) Organization technology of reflective discourse in learning process. Education and Society, no. 4 (69), pp. 26–29. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17732486. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Kostrova O.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies