SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL PECULIARITIES OF THE VERBS OF THE FINAL NEGATIVE WAY OF ACTING IN THE MODERN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article deals with the verbs of final negative way of acting, which are one of the brightest representatives of the group of ways of acting.
The verbs of final negative way of acting haven’t attracted the researchers` attention yet. Meanwhile it is rather interesting and actual to explore the given verbs from the functional stylistic and aspect correlation points of view as well as to find out what causes the negative consequences of acting semantics and the in different contexts. The term negative consequences of acting should be also qualified.
In the research process the following methods were used: observation, description and functional semantic analyses. The quantitative methodology was used in analysis and generalization of language phenomena.
As a material for the study, examples from works by Russian writers selected from the Russian National Corpus (F.M. Dostoevsky, V.P. Astafyev, M.M. Zoshchenko, V.I. Shukshin) were used.
A wide range of issues related to the principles of word formatiоn meaning, definition of its essence, patterns of interaction of affixes and motivating basis, etc. is considered in the given article.
The research proves that the semantics of word formation model itself plays an important role in creating of the negative consequence of acting до-…-ся as well as the usage of stylistically marked words (colloquial) as motivating verbs; in addition, the semantics of the negative result of acting is created by the context and situation. The semantics of the negative result of acting is manifested as the occurrence of the subject“s negatively assessed state (fatigue, unfitness, exhaustion), negative development of events,  negative situations as a result of the subject`s acting. The functional stylistic features of the verbs of the final negative mode of acting are determined and it is established that functioning in colloquial speech is one their characteristics. We have also established that the imperfective forms of the given verbs are rarely used and in addition the obstacle to their formation is the total meaning of the perfect form.

About the authors

Z. I. Godizova

North Ossetian State University after K.L. Khetagurov

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

Doctor of Philological Sciences, associate professor, Department of Russian Language, dean of the Faculty of Russian Philology

Van Qian

North Ossetian State University after K.L. Khetagurov

Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1381-6992

post-graduate student of the Department of Russian Language, Faculty of Russian Philology

References

  1. Volotskaya 1966 – Volotskaya Z.M. Semanticheskaya klassifikatsiya i sposob obrazovaniya otymennykh glagolov [Semantic classification and way of denominal verb formation]. In: Strukturnaya tipologiya yazykov [Structural typology of languages]. M.: Nauka, 1966, pp. 165–180 [in Russian].
  2. Golovin 1966 – Golovin B.N. Pristavochnoe vnutriglagol'noe slovoobrazovanie v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk [Prefix verbal word formation in the modern Russian literary language: Author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Philological Sciences thesis]. M., 1966, 44 p. [in Russian].
  3. Zemskaya 1992 – Zemskaya E.A. Slovoobrazovanie kak deyatel'nost' [Word formation as an activity]. M.: Nauka, 1992, 221 p. [in Russian].
  4. Lopatin, Ulukhanov 2016 – Lopatin V.V., Ulukhanov I.S. Slovar' slovoobrazovatel'nyh affiksov sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of word formation affixes in the modern Russian language]. M.: ITs «Azbukovnik», 2016, 812 p. Available at: http://www.ruslang.ru/book_lopatin-uluxanov16 [in Russian].
  5. Manachuryan 1975 – Manachuryan R.S. Problemy issledovaniya slovoobrazovatel'nykh znachenii i sredstv ikh vyrazheniya: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk [Issues of word formation study and means of their expression: Doctor’s of Philological Sciences thesis]. Erevan, 1975, 421 p. [in Russian].
  6. Nikolaev 2009 – Nikolaev G.A. Russkoe istoricheskoe slovoobrazovanie: Teoreticheskie problemy [Russian historical word formation: theoretical issues]. M.: «Knizhnyi dom “LIBROKOM”, 2009, 177 p. Available at: https://nashol.com/2017100196746/russkoe-istoricheskoe-slovoobrazovanie-teoreticheskie-problemi-nikolaev-g-a-2010.html [in Russian].
  7. Russkaya grammatika 2005 – Russkaya grammatika: v 2 t. [Russian grammar: in 2 vols.]. M.: Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova, 2005. Available at: http://ussrbooks.ru/russkaja-grammatika-v-2-h-tomah-n-ju-shvedova-1980 [in Russian].
  8. Teoriya funktsional'noi grammatiki… 2003 – Teoriya funktsional'noi grammatiki. Vvedenie. Aspektual'nost'. Vremennaya lokalizovannost'. Taksis. Izd. 3-e, stereotip. [Theory of functional grammar. Introduction. Aspectuality. Temporary localization. Taxis. 3-rd edition, stereotyped]. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003, 352 p. Available at:
  9. https://superlinguist.ru/grammatika-skachat-knigi-besplatno/bondarko-a-v-teoriia-funktcionalnoi-grammatiki-vvedenie-aspektualnost-vremennaia-lokalizovannost-taksis.html
  10. [in Russian].
  11. Tikhonov 1972 – Tikhonov A.N. Sinkhroniya i diakhroniya v slovoobrazovanii [Synchrony and diachrony in word formation]. In: Aktual'nye problemy russkogo slovoobrazovaniya [Actual problems of Russian word formation]. Samarkand, 1972, pp. 351–378 [in Russian].
  12. Troshkina, Cherepanov 2000 – Troshkina A.N., Cherepanov M.V. Formirovanie znacheniya intensivnosti deistviya v protsesse semanticheskogo razvitiya glagola [Formation of intensity of action meaning in the process of semantic development of a verb]. In: Predlozhenie i slovo. Paradigmaticheskii, tekstovyi i kommunikativnyi aspekty [Sentence and word. Paradigmatic, text and communication aspects]. Saratov, 2000, pp. 116–120. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24750658 [in Russian].
  13. Ulukhanov 1972 – Ulukhanov I.S. O nekotorykh promezhutochnykh yavleniyakh v slovoobrazovanii (K sootnosheniyu sinkhronii i diakhronii) [About some intermediate phenomena in word formation (To the correlation of synchrony and diachrony)]. In: Aktual'nye problemy russkogo slovoobrazovaniya. I. Materialy respublikanskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (12–15 sentyabrya 1972 g.) [Topical issues of the Russian word formation. I. Materials of the Republican research conference (September 12–15, 1972)]. Samarkand, 1972, pp. 207–212.
  14. Ulukhanov 2007 – Ulukhanov I.S. Slovoobrazovatel'naya semantika v russkom yazyke i printsipy ee opisaniya [Word formation semantics in the Russian language and the principles of its description]. M.: Izdatel'stvo LKI, 2007, 256 p. Available at:
  15. https://cassiopeiabook.info/books/slovoobrazovatelnaya-semantika-v-russkom-yazyike-i-printsipyi-ee-opisaniya
  16. [in Russian].
  17. Cherepanov 2004 – Cherepanov M.V. Ocherk slovoobrazovatel'noi tipologii russkogo glagola [Essay of word formation typology of the Russian verb]. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. gos. un-ta, 2004, 608 p. Available at: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01002454451 [in Russian].
  18. Shelyakin 1979 – Shelyakin M.A. Terminativno-prodolzhitel'nye i terminativno-intensivnye sposoby deistviya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Terminal continuous and terminal intensive ways of action in the modern Russian language]. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gos. Universiteta [Scientific notes of the University of Tartu], 1979, no. 4, Issue 482, pp. 64–74 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Godizova Z.I., Qian V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies