TYPES OF DEONTIC AGENT IN POLITICAL SPEECH (ON THE MATERIAL OF GERMAN AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study is dedicated to the problem of semantic and functional variability of deontic constructions. Deontic is an invariant characteristic of any discourse, which, depending on its type, organizes modal structures in different ways. In relation to the actions of an obligatory change in the state of affairs in the world, this modality is expressed by a statement in which there are two plans: informative, (action to perform) and deontic, including information about various factors that require creating a different state of affairs, about the nature of the modal attitude to action (mandatory, prohibited or permitted) and about the performer of the action, i.e. about the modal source, modal force and modal agents.
The functional features of deontic expressions and the various combinations and variations of their components depend on the type of discourse. In this paper the types of modal agents in the nuclear genre of political discourse – political speeches in German and Russian linguistic cultures – are described using contextual analysis. The study shows that the set of deontic agents is predetermined by this discursive practice, its functional and system-forming characteristics, and has a similarity in the implementation of a modal agent regardless of linguoculture. The method of functional-semantic description reveals that various types of deontic agents, their variability and semantic flexibility allow deontic utterances to realize different functions, thus determining the peculiarity of deontic modality in political discourse.

About the authors

A. W. Sytko

Minsk State Linguistic University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

Candidate of Philological Sciences, head of the Department of German Phonetics and Grammar

References

  1. Verstraete 2005 – Verstraete J.-Ch. Scalar quantity implicatures and the interpretation of modality. Problems in the deontic domain. Journal of Pragmatics, September 2005, 37(9), pp. 1401–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.003 [in English].
  2. Papafragou 2000 – Papafragou A. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2000, 238 p. Available at: http://bookfi.net/book/1065083 [in English].
  3. Bondarko 1992 – Bondarko A.V. Sub»ektno-predikatno-ob»ektnye situatsii [Subject-predicate-object situations]. In: Teoriya funktsional’noi grammatiki: sub”ektnost’. Ob”ektnost’. Kommunikativnaya perspektiva vyskazyvaniya. Opredelennost’ / neopredelennost’ [Theory of functional grammar: subjectivity. Objectivity. Communicative perspective of utterance. Certainty / uncertainty]. SPb., 1992, pp. 29–70 [in Russian].
  4. Greimas, Fontanille 2007 – Greimas A.J., Fontanille J. Semiotika strastei. Ot sostoyaniya veshchei k sostoyaniyu dushi, per. s fr. I.G. Merkulovoi [Semiotics of passions. From the state of things to the state of soul. Translated from French by I.G. Merkulova]. M.: LKI, 2007, 334 p. Available at: https://vk.com/doc30601958_443073024 [in Russian].
  5. Karasik 1992 – Karasik V.I. Yazyk sotsial’nogo statusa [Language of social status]. M.; Volgograd: In-t yazykoznaniya, Peremena, 1992, 329 p. Available at: http://www.l-406.narod.ru/SocL/karasik.pdf [in Russian].
  6. Norman, Plotnikova 2016 – Norman B.Yu., Plotnikova A.M. Konstruktsii s mestoimeniem my: formirovanie aktual’noi ili okkazional’noi kollektivnoi identichnosti [Structures with the pronoun мы: formation of actual and occasional collective identity]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2016, no. 6 (34), pp. 126–138. doi: 10.15293/2226-3365.1606.10 [in Russian].
  7. Paducheva 2016 – Paducheva E.V. Modal’nost’ [Modality]. In: Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoi grammatiki [Materials for the project of corpus description of Russian grammar. M., 2016. Available at: http://rusgram.ru/Модальность#212 (accessed 14.02.2019) [in Russian].
  8. Stepanov 1995 – Stepanov Y.S. Al’ternativnyi mir, Diskurs, Fakt i printsip Prichinnosti [Alternative world, discourse, fact and the principle of causality]. In: Yazyk i nauka kontsa XX veka: sb. st. Pod red. Yu.S. Stepanova [Language and science of the late XX century: collection of research papers. Yu.S. Stepanov (Ed.)]. M.: RGGU, 1995, pp. 35–73. Available at: http://abuss.narod.ru/Biblio/stepanov.htm [in Russian].
  9. Fuko 2004 – Fuko M. Arkheologiya znanii, per. s fr. M.B. Rakovoi, A.Yu. Serebryannikovoi [Archeology of Knowledge. Translated from French by M.B. Rakova, A.Yu. Serebryannikova]. SPb.: ITs «Gumanitarnaya Akademiya», 2004, 416 p. Available at: http://bookfi.net/book/1481275 [in Russian].
  10. Sheygal 2004 – Sheygal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa: monografiya [Semiotics of political discourse: monograph]. M.: Gnozis, 2004, 324 p. Available at: https://indusbook.xyz/books/semiotika-politicheskogo-disku [in Russian].
  11. Shvedova 1998 – Shvedova N.Yu. Mestoimenie i smysl. Klass russkikh mestoimenii i otkryvaemye imi smyslovye prostranstva [Pronoun and Meaning. The class of Russian pronouns and the semantic spaces opened by them]. M., 1998, 176 p. Available at: http://en.bookfi.net/book/1471588 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Sytko A.W.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies