REFLECTIVE SPACE OF THE POLEMICAL DISCOURSE

Abstract

With the sovereign advent of the Internet in all spheres of human life, qualitative changes have occurred in the former communicative model of the mass media. The development in the field of information technology has led to the formation of a new linguistic phenomenon – a newspaper text online format. The article is devoted to the study of the dialogical space of the polemical discourse of German-language printed media. The purpose of the study is to find an answer to the question of how the controversy is realized, how the reflexive space is formed, where many factors converge, like in focus: psychological, social and proper linguistic factors that determine the specific verbal behavior of modern communicators. The main communicative practices are distinguished: multimedia, hypertextuality and interactivity, which allow defining the phenomenon under study as a special communicative product, based on the interaction of subjects in the process of discussing a pressing problem. Special attention is paid to changing the direction of actions of the communicative process – the transition to the so-called «horizontal communication» according to the scheme «from many to many.» Online versions of newspapers and magazines offer users an interactive tool that makes it possible to control the content, feedback, participation in forums, commenting on articles. In addition to the usual comments, the article highlights a special kind of professional commentary – «polemical.» The evaluation and modal components of the polemical commentary are characterized by the presence of polar points of view, which creates a space of controversy, a space of reflexive dialogue, expanding the possibilities of the readership to join the discussion. The materials of the work represent a wide field for further work on the study of language regulators that guide communicative interaction in an infinitely variable communicative environment.

About the authors

A. I. Udelkina

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

postgraduate student of the Department of German Philology

References

  1. Burger 2005 – Burger H. Mediensprache. Eine Einführung in Sprache und Kommunikationsformen der Massenmedien. Berlin, New York: de Gryuter, 2005. 486 S. [in German].
  2. Fowler 1991 – Fowler R. Language in the News Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London, New York: Routledge, 1991, 254 p. [in English].
  3. Arnold 1999 – Arnold I.V. Problemy dialogizma, intertekstual’nosti i germenevtiki (v interpertatsii khudozhestv. teksta) [Problems of dialogism. intertextuality and hermeneutics (in the interpretation of artistic text)]. SPb.: RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena, 1999, 253 p. [in Russian].
  4. Belyaev 2008 – Belyaev A.A. Dizain-model’ internet-versii kak rezul’tat transformatsii modeli pechatnogo izdaniia [Design model of Internet versions as a result of the transformation of the model of a printed publication]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10. Zhurnalistika [Moscow University Journalism Bulletin], 2008, no. 2, pp. 52-62 [in Russian].
  5. Braginskaya 2009 – Braginskaya N.V. Kommentarii kak mekhanizm innovatsii v traditsionnoi kul’ture i ne tol’ko [Comment as a mechanism for innovation in traditional culture and not only]. In: Kultura interpretacii do novogo vremeni / otv. red.: Yu.V. Ivanova, A.M. Rutkevich [Culture of interpretation before the new time. Yu.V. Ivanova, A.M. Rutkevich (Eds.)]. M.: Izd. dom GU-VShE, 2009, pp. 19–67 [in Russian].
  6. Danilova 2017 – Danilova N.K. Diskursivnyi status kategorii narrativnosti [Discursive status of the category of narrativity]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia, pedagogika, filologiia [Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology], 2017, Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 79–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2017-23-4-79-81 [in Russian].
  7. Ignatieva 2006 – Ignatieva A.S. Metaforika nauchno-publitsisticheskogo media-teksta online formata (na materiale angliiskogo i nemetskogo iazykov): dis. … kand. filol. nauk. [Metaphorics of an online journalistic media text (based on English and German): Candidate’s of Philological Sciences thesis]. Irkutsk, 2006, 220 p. [in Russian].
  8. Ionova 2010 – Ionova T. A. Lingvosemioticheskaia spetsifika teksta kommentariia v sovremennykh britanskikh SMI [Lingvosemiotic specificity of the text of the comment in the modern British media]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 2010, no. 2 (12), pp. 181–185. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvosemioticheskaya-spetsifika-teksta-kommentariya-v-sovremennyh-britanskih-smi [in Russian].
  9. Kakorina 2008 – Kakorina E.V. SMI i internet-kommunikatsiia (oblasti peresecheniia i problemy vzaimodeistviia) [Media and Internet communication (areas of intersection and problems of interaction)]. In: Iazyk sovremennoi publitsistiki: Sb. statei. Sost. G.Ia. Solganik. 2-e izd., ispr.. [Language of modern journalism: Collection of articles. Complier G.Ya. Solganik. 2nd edition, revised]. M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2007, pp. 67–99 [in Russian].
  10. Kalmykov, Kohanova 2005 – Kalmykov A.A., Kohanova L.A. Internet-zhurnalistika. Teoreticheskie osnovy. Akademicheskii uchebnik [Internet journalism. Theoretical basis. Academic textbook]. M.: Akademiia mediaindustrii, 2018, 370 p. Available at: http://www.ipk.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=276 [in Russian].
  11. Kalugina 2013 – Kalugina Yu.V. Kognitivnaia metafora angliiskogo publitsisticheskogo media-teksta online formata (na materiale publitsistiki ekonomicheskogo krizisa 2008–2012 gg.): dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Cognitive metaphor of the English journalistic media text online format (on the material of the journalism of economic crisis of 2008–2012): Candidate’s of Philological Sciences thesis]. Ufa, 2013, 187 p. [in Russian].
  12. Kruglova 2016 – Kruglova L.A. Rossiiskie pechatnye SMI: spetsifika onlain-versii [Russian print media: specifics of online versions]. Mediaskop [Mediascope], 2016, Issue 4. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2205 [in Russian].
  13. Lotman 2009 – Lotman Yu.M. Filosofiia Rossii vtoroi poloviny XX veka. Pod red. V.K. Kantora [Russian philosophy of the second half of the XX century. V.K. Kantor (Ed.)]. M.: ROSSPEN, 2009, 399 p. [in Russian].
  14. Tomashevsky 1999 – Tomashevsky B.V. Teoriia literatury. Poetika [Theory of Literature. Poetics]. M.: Aspekt-Press, 1999, 334 p. [in Russian].
  15. Fuko 2010 – Fuko M. Rozhdenie kliniki. Per. s fr. A.Sh. Tkhostov [The birth of the clinic. Translation from French by A.Sh. Tkhostov]. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2010, 252 p. [in Russian].
  16. Shesterina 2004 – Shesterina A.M. Polemicheskii tekst v sovremennoi presse: dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk [Polemical text in the modern press: Doctor of Philological Sciences thesis]. Tambov, 2004, 498 p. [in Russian].

Statistics

Views

Abstract: 1118

PDF (Russian): 323

Dimensions

PlumX

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Udelkina A.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies