Cite item


The article considers the Church policy of Prince Mikhail Alexandrovich of Tver. Tver Prince managed to defend the independence of his Principality in the fight against the strengthened Moscow Principality, which claimed the role of the unifier of Russia. The Church had an important place in his affeirs. At the beginning of the XIV century the alliance of Moscow and Russian metropolitans formed. Metropolitan Alexius most actively used the opportunities of the Church to strengthen the positions of Moscow. Being the enemy of the Prince Dmitry Ivanovich of Moscow, Mikhail turned out to be an opponent of the Metropolitan Alexius. Based on the chronicle material and correspondence of the Patriarchate of Constantinople with the warring parties, the conflict between the Metropolitan and the Prince of Tver is traced. The opposite sides appealed to the Patriarch Philotheus to support their position. Initially, the Patriarch of Constantinople expressed support for Alexius, but under the influence of Mikhail Alexandrovich and his ally, the Lithuanian prince Olgerd, he took a neutral conciliatory position. As a result, under the influence of Philotheus, the prince of Tver reconciled with Alexius. Mikhail developed excellent relations with the next Metropolitan Cyprian, who was hiding in Tver from the troops of Tokhtamysh. The position of Bishop of Tver had also great importance. Bishop Basil suffered from the Metropolitan for supporting Mikhail. However, in 1390 there was a conflict between the prince and the new Tver bishop Euthymius. Metropolitan Cyprian reconciled them by ordaining a new bishop Arsenius to Tver. Mikhail carried out active church construction, maintained contacts with Constantinople and Athos. The author attempted to analyze the relations of Mikhail of Tver with the Church and their influence on the political situation in North-Eastern Russia in the second half of the 14th century.

About the authors

S. Yu. Tarabrin

Saratov State University

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

postgraduate student, Department of Russian History and Archaeology


  1. Borzakovskiy 2006 – Borzakovskiy V.S. Istoriia Tverskogo kniazhestva [History of the Princedom of Tver]. M.: Izdatelskii dom «Rubezhi XXI», 2006, 506 p. [in Russian].
  2. Borisov 2011 – Borisov N.S. Vozvyshenie Moskvy [Rise of Moscow]. M.: Russkii mir, 2011, 576 p. Available at: : [in Russian].
  3. Borisov 2014 – Borisov N.S. Dmitrii Donskoi [Dmitry Donskoy]. M.: Mol. gvardiia, 2014, 507 p. Available at: [in Russian].
  4. Gorskiy 2001 – Gorskiy A.A. «Vsego esi ispolnena zemlia Russkaia…»: Lichnosti i mental’nost’ russkogo Srednevekov’ia: Ocherki [«Russian land, you are full of everything…»: Personality and mentality of Medieval period in Russia: Essays]. M.: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2001, 176 p. Available at: [in Russian].
  5. Dvornichenko, Krivosheev, Sokolov, Shaposhnik 2012 – Dvornichenko A.Yu., Krivosheev Yu.V., Sokolov R.A., Shaposhnik V.V. Russkoe pravoslavie. Ot kreshcheniia do patriarshestva [Russian Orthodoxy. From baptism to patriarchy]. SPb.: Akademiia issledovaniia kul’tury, 2012, 411 p. Available at: [in Russian].
  6. Ziborov 2002 – Ziborov V.K. Russkoe letopisanie XI–XVIII vekov [Russian chronicles of the XI–XVIII centuries]. SPb.: Filologicheskii fakul’tet SPbGU, 2002, 512 p. Available at: [in Russian].
  7. Klyug 1994 – Klyug E. Kniazhestvo Tverskoe (1247–1485 gg.) [Principality of Tver]. Tver: «RIF LTD», 1994, 432 p. [in Russian]
  8. Konyavskaya 2007 – Konyavskaya E.L. Sud nad Tverskim episkopom Evfimiem i postavlenie na episkopskuiu kafedru Arseniia [Court over the Bishop Euthymius of Tver and ordination to the Episcopal chair of Arsenius]. In: Srednevekovaia Rus’ [Medieval Russia]. M.: Indrik, 2007, Vol. 7, pp. 317–338. Available at:

Copyright (c) 2018 Tarabrin S.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies