FEATURES OF EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF SPECIALISTS OF SOCIAL SPHERE

Abstract

The social sphere, which includes such important components. as education, health care, the system of social protection of population, culture, makes serious demands on the level of training of specialists. This is due to the increasingly escalating contradictions between the social order of society for future specialists for the social sphere and the imperfection of their training system; the need to develop a quality system for training specialists for the social sphere and the lack of specific criteria for assessing the quality of training.

In the article the problem of professional training of specialists for the social sphere is investigated, its goals, tasks, and features are revealed, in particular, its mega-theoretical character and a practical orientation are named among the main ones. The problem of the quality of professional training of specialists for the social sphere is defined as a problem that requires careful study. For this purpose, the article provides a definition of quality, reveals the essence of the concept of the quality of education, which allows us to identify the dominant trends in assessing the quality of training specialists for the social sphere.

It is noted that the organic unity of intellectual, emotional, spiritual properties and qualities, communicative, technological, praxeological and other knowledge and skills that the future specialist is able to effectively implement in his professional activity is the main indicator of the quality of professional training of specialists for the social sphere. In addition, there are objective and subjective criteria for assessing the quality of professional training of specialists for the social sphere. The first include the real changes in the position of man, society as a whole, which they also estimated. Subjective criteria include an assessment of the quality of teachers’ activities and an assessment of the quality of the work of future students.

About the authors

L. V. Kurilenko

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7045-4310

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, professor, head of the Department of Theory and Technology of Social Work

M. G. Vokhrysheva

Samara State Institute of Culture

Email: morenov@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1381-6992

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, professor, head of the Department of Document Science and Bibliography

References

  1. Andronov V.P. Otsenka kachestva professional’noi podgotovki studentov universiteta [Evaluation of quality of vocational training of university students]. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.P. Ogareva, 2012 [in Russian].
  2. Verbitsky A.A. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod i teoriia kontekstnogo obucheniia: Materialy k chetvertomu zasedaniiu metodologicheskogo seminara 16 noiabria 2004 g. [Competence approach and the theory of contextual learning: materials for the fourth meeting of the methodological seminar November 16, 2004]. M.: Issledovatel’skii tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2004 [in Russian].
  3. Gorshenina M.V., Sukhinin V.P., Chernova Yu.K. Realizatsiia osnovnykh printsipov menedzhmenta kachestva v sotsial’nykh sistemakh obrazovaniia [Realization of the basic principles of quality management in social education systems]. In: Problemy kachestva obrazovaniia: materialy XVI vseros. nauch.-metod. konf. «Aktual. problemy kachestva obrazovaniia i puti ikh resheniia v kontekste evrop. i mirovykh tendentsii» [Problems of the quality of education: materials of the XVI all-Russian research and methodological conference «Topical issues of the quality of education and ways to solve them in the context of European and the world tendencies»]. M-vo obrazovaniia i nauki Ros. Federatsii, Feder. agentstvo po obrazovaniiu, Issled. tsentr problem kachestva podgot. spetsialistov Mosk. gos. in-ta stali i splavov (tekhnol. un-ta), Ufim. gos. aviats. tekhn. un-t. M.: Issled. tsentr problem kachestva podgot. spetsialistov, 2006 [in Russian].
  4. Gorshenina M.V., Krivushkin Yu.N., Sukhinin V.P. Osnovy proektirovaniia obrazovatel’nykh sistem s pozitsii kachestva [Basics of designing educational systems in terms of quality]. M.: Otkrytyi mir, 2007 [in Russian].
  5. Kobazova Yu.V. Metodika otsenki kachestva raboty pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdenii [Methodology for assessing the quality of work of pedagogical staff of educational institutions]. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovaniia [Management of the quality of education], 2010, no. 2, pp. 58–62 [in Russian].
  6. Motova GN, Navodnov V.G. Ekspertiza kachestva obrazovaniia: evropeiskii podkhod [Examination of the quality of education: European approach]. M.: Natsional’noe akkreditatsionnoe agentstvo v sfere obrazovaniia, 2005 [in Russian].
  7. Otsenka rezul’tativnosti, effektivnosti i kachestva deiatel’nosti uchrezhdenii sotsial’noi podderzhki naseleniia. Pod red. E.R. Iarskoi-Smirnovoi i dr. [Evaluation of effectiveness, efficiency and quality of the activities of social support institutions. E.R.Yarskaya-Smirnova et al. (Eds.)]. Saratov: OOO Izd-vo «Nauchnaia kniga», 2007 [in Russian].
  8. Pozdnyakova O.K. Ball’no-reitingovaia sistema otsenki kachestva uchebnoi raboty studentov vuza [Grade-rating system for assessing the quality of academic work of university students]. In: Novaia strategiia otsenivaniia uchebnoi deiatel’nosti [New strategy for evaluating learning activities]. Samara State Technical University, Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2016, pp. 397–404 [in Russian].
  9. Rudneva T.I., Khramtsova A.B., Khramtsov E.B. Kachestvo professional’noi podgotovki: metodologicheskie aspekty [Quality of vocational training: methodological aspects]. In: Sostoianie i perspektivy razvitiia vysshego obrazovaniia v sovremennom mire. Materialy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Pod red. G.A. Berulava [The state and prospects of development of higher education in the modern world. Proceedings of the International Research and Practical Conference. G.A. Berulava (Ed.)]. M., 2017, pp. 38–40 [in Russian].
  10. Rudneva T.I., Rubtsova T.P. Vnutrivuzovskii monitoring kachestva obucheniia [Intramural training quality monitoring]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia, pedagogika, filologiia [Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology], 2018, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 70–76. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2018-24-2-70-76 [in Russian].
  11. Skok G.B. Nekotorye normy kachestva deiatel’nosti prepodavatelia [Some norms of the quality of the teacher’s activity]. [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2003, no. 3B (26), pp. 84–90. Available at: http://www.umj.ru/index.php/pub/inside/362 [in Russian].
  12. Solovova N.V. Kachestvo rezul’tatov obucheniia studentov [Quality of results of students’ learning]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University], 2013, no. 2(103), pp. 170–174. Available at: http://journals.ssau.ru/index.php/hpp/article/view/3360 [in Russian].
  13. Sovremennye podkhody k otsenke kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov v usloviiakh realizatsii FGOS: tekhnologicheskie i metodicheskie aspekty [Modern approaches to assessing the quality of training specialists in the context of FSES implementation: technological and methodological aspects]. Materialy oblastnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 4 oktiabria 2012 goda. M-vo obrazovaniia Nizhegorodskoi obl., Gos. biudzhetnoe obrazovatel’noe uchrezhdenie dop. prof. obrazovaniia «Nizhegorodskii in-t razvitiia obrazovaniia»; [otv. red. L.N. Kazakova] [Materials of the regional research and practical conference, October 4, 2012. Ministry of Education of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, State budgetary educational institution of further professional education «Nizhny Novgorod Institute of the Education Development»; [L.N. Kazakova (Ed.)]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhegorodskii in-t razvitiia obrazovaniia, 2013 [in Russian].
  14. Sokolova I.Yu. Usloviia obespecheniia kachestva obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Conditions for ensuring the quality of the educational process]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniia [Fundamental research], 2014, no. 11 (part 5), pp. 1172–1178. Available at: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=35699 [in Russian].
  15. Suslov A.G. Sistema otsenki kachestva podgotovki spetsialista [System for assessing the quality of specialist training]. Kachestvo. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie [Quality. Innovation. Education], 2005, no. 3, pp. 58–61 [in Russian].
  16. Sukhinin V.P., Gorshenina M.V. Upravlenie kachestvom proektirovaniia obrazovatel’noi sredy vuza [Quality management design of the educational environment of the university]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki [Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences Series], 2014, no. 3 (23), pp. 192–197. Available at: http://vestnik-pp.samgtu.ru/article/view/id/435 [in Russian].

Statistics

Views

Abstract: 1049

PDF (Russian): 295

Dimensions

PlumX

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Kurilenko L.V., Vokhrysheva M.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies