INTERNET-DISCOURSE: TYPES OF TEXT IN THE HOUSEKEEPING DISCOURCE

Abstract

The paper deals with the analysis of two types of text – instructions and comments – in the housekeeping internet-discourse. In general, the instruction keeps its typical structure and language form in the Internet communication, but acquires personal connotation. In comments to the Internet instructions emotional information prevails over cognitive one. Comments, which, in fact, are questions or suggestions, basically keep their pragmatic meaning. The author comes to the conclusion that differences of these types of text in the internet-discourse with their written variants are conditioned by the attempt of their authors to join in and become part of the community of those who write texts as well as those who read them.

About the authors

M. A. Goncharova

Samara National Researh University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov.sv@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1825-0097
Russian Federation

References

  1. Chernyakov À.N. Internet-diskurs v sovremennykh kul’turno-informatsionnykh kommunikatsiiakh: metodologicheskie problemy: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Online discourse in modern cultural-information communications: methodological problems: extended abstract of Candidate’s of philosophical sciences thesis]. Belgorod, 2009, 22 p. [in Russian].
  2. Akhrenova N.À. Internet-diskurs kak global’noe mezhkul’turnoe iavlenie i ego iazykovoe oformlenie: avtoref. dis. … dokt. filol. nauk [Internet discourse as a global and intercultural phenomenon and its linguistic form: extended abstract of Doctor’s of philosophical sciences thesis]. M., 2009, 36 p. [in Russian].
  3. Ivanov L.Yu. Iazyk interneta: zametki lingvista [The language of the Internet: notes of linguist]. In: Slovar’ i kul’tura russkoi rechi [Dictionary and culture of Russian speech]. M.: Azbukovnik, 2000, pp. 56–62 [in Russian].
  4. Vokhrysheva Å.V. Zhanrovaia spetsifika internet-diskursa [Genre specificity of Internet discourse]. In: Evoliutsiia i transformatsiia diskursov: iazykovye, filologicheskie i sotsiokul’turnye aspekty: sbornik materialov nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Samara, 14–15 marta 2014 g.) [Evolution and transformation of discources: linguistic, philological and
  5. sociocultural aspects: conference information package with international participation (Samara, March, 14–15, ]. Samara: Izd-vo OOO «Inkoma-press», 2014, pp. 245–254 [in Russian].
  6. Goroshko E.I., Zhigalina E.A. Virtual’noe zhanrovedenie: ustoiavsheesia i spornoe [Virtual genre study: fixed and disputable]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki [Journal of Psycholinguistics], 2010, no. 12, pp. 105–123 [in Russian].
  7. Brinker K. Linguistische Textanalyse: eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Klaus Brinker. Berlin: Schmidt, 1992, 160 p. [in German].
  8. Pörksen U. Textsorten, Textsortenverschränkungen und Sprachattrapen. Wirkendes Wort, B. 24, 1974, 239 p. [in German].
  9. Reiss K. Texttyp und Übersetzungsmethode. Heidelberg, 1983, 140 p. [in German].
  10. Onoshko V.N., Kiseleva V.V. Dialogicheskii diskurs kak realizatsiia kommunikatsii [Dialogical discourse as the realization of communication]. In: Evoliutsiia i transformatsiia diskursov: iazykovye, filologicheskie i sotsiokul’turnye aspekty: sbornik materialov nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Samara, 14–15 marta 2014 g.) [Evolution and transformation of