NECESSITY OF INVESTMENT DEFENSE PARTY WITH RIGHT TO APPOINT ANY FORENSIC EXPERTISES
- Authors: Bakhtadze G.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- полковник юстиции
- Issue: Vol 20, No 11/2 (2014)
- Pages: 87-94
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/hpp/article/view/4081
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2014-20-11/2-87-94
- ID: 4081
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article proves that the defender’s right of evidence collecting stated by our legislators has an elusive character incompatible with the enhancement of competitive fundamentals in the valid Russia criminal procedures because this right does not eliminate the disbalance in the potential possibilities of two competing sides (prosecution and defense) at forming a body of evidence. This is why the article – based on Georgia’s positive legislative experience - substantiates the necessity of radical reformation of Russian criminal procedure to achieve real parity in the legal powers of prosecution and defense parties at their probative activity comprising appointment of any forensic expertises as well.
About the authors
G. E. Bakhtadze
полковник юстиции
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1825-0097
References
- Larinkov A.A. To the issue of the powers of the defender to collect evidence in criminal
- procedures. Kriminalist»» [Criminalist], 2011, no. 1(, pp. 47–51 [in Russian]
- Lupinskaya P.A. Evidences and proving in Criminal Procedure Law of the Russian Federation:
- textbook. P.A. Lupinskaya (ed.). 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. M., Norma, 2009, Chapter 8,
- pp. 281–[in Russian]
- Mikhailovskaya I.B. The rule of «favor» to the defense party and its influence on the probative
- process. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2007, no. 9, pp. 41–[in Russian]
- Petrukhin I.L. Theoretical grounds of the criminal procedure reform in Russia: in two parts.
- M., TK Velbi, 2004, part 1, p. [in Russian]
- Baev M.O. The theory of professional defense: tactical and ethical aspects. M., Iurlitinform,
- , p. [in Russian]
- Sheifer S.A. Evidence and proving in criminal cases: problems of theory and law regulation.
- M., Norma, 2009, p. Retrieved from: artshamardin.narod.ru›files…acts2…sheifer.pdf (accessed
- 2014). [in Russian]
- Lazareva V.A. Influence of competitiveness of criminal procedure on notions of proof theory.
- Iuridicheskii analiticheskii zhurnal [Juridical Analytical Journal], 2006, no. (15), pp. 14–19 [in
- Russian]
- Kuznetsov N., Dadonov S. Right of the defender to collect evidence: essence and limits.
- Rossiiskaia iustitsiia [Russian Justice], 2002, no. 8, p. [in Russian]
- Lazareva V.A. On evidences, its admissibility and ways of collecting. Novyi Ugolovnoprotsessual’nyi
- kodeks Rossii v deistvii: materialy kruglogo stola, Moskva, noiab. 2003 g. [New
- Criminal Procedure Code of Russia in action: materials of the round table, Moscow, November
- , 2003], I.F. Demidov. M., TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2004, pp. 131–[in Russian].
- Melnikov V.Yu. The defender’s participation in the course of pre-trial procedure. Evraziiskaia
- advokatura [Eurasian Advocateship], 2013, no. 2(, p. 35–41 [in Russian]
- Os’makov M.A. Advokatskoe rassledovanie v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse: avtoref.
- dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Advocatory investigation in modern criminal procedure: Extended abstract
- of Candidate’s of Law thesis]. Vladimir, 2007, p. [in Russian]
- The concept of the RSFSR judiciary reform approved by RSFSR Supreme Council’s decree
- no. 1801-dated 24.10.1991. Retrieved from: http://base.garant.ru/6318369/ (accessed 21.09.2014).
- [in Russian]
- Korenevsky Yu.V., Padva G.P. The defender’s participation in the probative procedure by
- the new criminal procedure legislation: practical manual. M., Iurist»», 2004, p. [in Russian]
- Georgia Criminal Procedure Code dated 09.10.2009. Retrieved from: www.pravo.org.ua/
- files/Criminal%20justice/_-09_10_pdf (accessed 26.09.2014) [in Russian]
- Petrukhin I.L. From inquisition – to competitiveness. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and
- Law], 2003, no. 7, pp. 28–[in Russian]