Logical and cognitive analysis of visual and non-visual objects (Part I)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article continues the research connected with the use of the systematic model of argumentation with regard to the domain-specific object. Allegorical representations of values in the works of masters of various artistic schools, engravings and sculptural images are analyzed. Proverbs and sayings being judgments (arguments of different levels) with special status are considered as presuppositions. Principles and convictions, aphorisms and maxims considered as presupposition are analyzed in systematic model of argumentation. Judgments of deontic logic, which can be both arguments and a thesis and presupposition, are dealt with separately. Deontic systems and logics of E. Mally, G.-J. Lokhorst, G.H. von Wright, E.F. Karavaev are analyzed. Causal relationships of allegories and facts, the status of analytical and synthetic judgments as presupposition have been researched.

About the authors

Edgar s. Zolotov

Specialbureau № 1/39, Kaliningrad region

Author for correspondence.
Email: edgar1237@mail.ru

PhD in Philosophy

Russian Federation, 1, Yantarny pereulok, Sovetsk, Kaliningrad region, 443086, Russian Federation

References

  1. Udo, Arnold (1998), Die Hohmeister Des Deutschen Ordens, 1190–1994, N.G. Elwert, Marburg, Germany.
  2. Fisher, Irving (1912), Elementary Principles of Economics, Macmillan Company, New York, USA.
  3. Kipling, R. (1998), The Ballad of East and West, England, UK.
  4. Lewis, C.I. (1927), N.O. Losskij. Handbuch der Logik, autori-sierteübersetzung von Prof. Dr. W. Sessemann. Leipzig u. Berlin. 1927, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 24, pp. 665–667.
  5. Lewis, C.I. (1946), An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, USA.
  6. Lichtheim, M. (1973), Ancient Egyptian Literature, University of California Press, vol. 1, p. 194.
  7. Mally, Ernst (1926), Grundgesetze des Sollens: Elemente der Logik des Willens, Graz: Leuschner und Lubensky, Universitäts-Buchhandlung, viii+85 pp. Reprinted in Ernst Mally, LogischeSchriften: GroßesLogikfragment, Grundgesetze des Sollens, Karl Wolf and Paul Weingartner (eds.), Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1971, pp. 227–324.
  8. Babenko, V. (2015), This smart, crazy Marquis de Sade: life, passions, creation, Armchair Scientist Publishing House, Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  9. Bakhtin, А.P. (2020), Teutonic Order, Zhivem Puplishing House, Kaliningrad, Russia.
  10. Belnap, N. and Steel, Т. (1981), The logic of questions and qnswers, Progress Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  11. Bryushinkin, V.N. (1994), The analysis of arguments in the Kant’s essay “Ueber den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht fuer die Praxis”, The Anniversary International Scientific Conference, dedicated to the 450th anniversary of the founding of Albertina University of Konigsberg, September 26–29, Section 2: Kaliningrad, pp. 10–11.
  12. Bryushinkin, V.N. (2002), The comparative study of Western Russian and Russian philosophy by methods of argumentation theory on the example of texts by I. Kant, F. Nietzsche, V. Solovyov, V.N. Briushinkin (ed.), Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, pp. 7–33.
  13. Bryushinkin, V.N. (2003), The critical thinking and argumentation, The critical thinking, logic, argumentation, V.N. Briushinkin and V.I. Markina (ed.), Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, pp. 29–34.
  14. Bryushinkin, V.N. (1996), The practical course for humanities scholars, Novaya Shkola, Moscow, Russia.
  15. Bryushinkin, V.N. (2000), The system model of argumentations, The transcendental anthropology and logic: The works of the International Seminar “The anthropology from the cross-lights of modern philosophy” and VIII Kant-Readings, Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, pp. 133–154.
  16. Bryushinkin, V.N. (2004), The system model of argumentation as the basis of the methodology of philosophical comparative studies, The universe models. Studies in logic, argumentation and history of philosophy.: The collection of scholarly articles, V.N. Bryushinkin (ed.), Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, p. 66–85.
  17. Bryushinkin, V.N. (1988), Logic. Thinking. Information, Leningrad State University Publishing House, Leningrad, Russia.
  18. Wright, G.H. von (1986), Norms, Language, and Truth, Logico-philosophical studies, pp. 290–411.
  19. Wright, G.H. von (1986), Norm and Action, Logico-philosophical studies, pp. 245–289.
  20. Wright, G.H. von (1986), The new methods of the logic of preference, Logico-philosophical studies, pp. 411–448.
  21. Glinchikova, A.V. (2014), Subject-dependent normativity in deontic constructions of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Jeremy Bentham and Ernst Mally, Congress book of abstracts of the young scientists, National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, Issue 3, pp. 245–247.
  22. Glinchikova, A.V. (2013), Deontic calculation of Ernst Mally, Congress book of abstracts of the young scientists, National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, Issue 3, pp. 156–157.
  23. Gulyga, A.V. (1977), Kant, Molodaya Gvardiya Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  24. Dmitrieva, A.A. (2009), The painting “The Allegory of Painting” (“Painter in his Studio”) by Jan Vermeer. The main problems of iconography, The Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University, Issue 3, pp. 130–139.
  25. Dewey, J. (1997), Psychology and Pedagogical Science, Translated from English by N.M. Nikolskaya, Sovershenstvo Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  26. Zolotov, E.S. (2001), Allegory: meaning and import, Methodological basics of the modern philology: scientific idealism and materialism: Materials of the international summer research school of a young philologist. Primorye. 1-4 0f July 2001, Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad.
  27. Zolotov, E.S. (2003), Presupposition as the object of logic and cognitive analysis: methodological aspect, Information-Communication-Society (IKS-2003): Scientific conference abstracts of the International scientific conference. Saint Petersburg, 11–12 November, pp. 172–174.
  28. Zolotov, E.S. (2021), Presuppositions and the world models withing the system model of argumentation, Innovative approaches in the modern science: collection of articles in accordance with the materials of the LXXXV International scientific-practical conference “Innovative approaches in the modern science”, Internauka Publishing House, Moscow, no. 1 (85), pp. 100–105.
  29. Zolotov, E.S. (2005), Knowledge extraction from the topical area texts: the search methodology of the indistinct objects, VIIIth International Conference Cognitive Modeling in Linguistics, Varna, Bulgaria. September 4–11, V.II.
  30. Zolotov, E.S. (2001), Pragmatic aspects of “system-like argumentation model”, Internal and external borders of the philological knowledge: Primorye, Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, 1–4 July, pp. 44–49.
  31. Zolotov, E.S. (2002), High-level concept ER (Entity-Relationshipmodel) models in the system-like argumentation model: perspectives of research, The VII-th scientific conference “The modern logic: the problems of theory, history and appliance in science. Saint Petersburg, The materials of the international seminar, Saint Petersburg State University Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, 20–22 June, pp. 157–159.
  32. Zolotov, E.S. (2001), Cognitive analysis of the text on the example of the process of constructing the value and cognitive map of Tertullian’s treatise “De testimonio animae”, Linguistic of the 21st century: problems and prospects. Svetlogorsk, The materials of the international seminar, Publishing House of KSU, Kaliningrad, 20–23 Septemper.
  33. Zolotov, E.S. (1998), Study of the means of strengthening the argument in Tertullian’s treatise “De testimonio animae”, Logical Kant Studies – 4, The materials of the international seminar, Kaliningrad State University, Kaliningrad, pp. 139–160.
  34. Zolotov, E.S. (2002), The example of the diagrams creation “life essence circle” in the system-like argumentation: ontological aspect, The materials of the international seminar “The problems of the reality conceptualization and the linguistic world-image simulation”, Severodvinsk, 21–23 May, pp. 15–16.
  35. Zolotov, E.S. (2020), The meaning and significance of allegories as not evident designated objects in the systemic model of argumentation (SMA), Internauka: electronic journal of science, no. 47 (176), pp. 16–19.
  36. Zolotov, E.S. (2004), The result of applying the systemic-like argumentation model to the text analysis, International Scientific Conference “Innovations in science and education”, Proceedings (Materials), Kaliningrad, 20–22 October, p. 182.
  37. Zolotov, E.S. (2021), Features of the application of graph theory in the the system analysis of text, Universum: Engineering Science: electronic journal of science, no. 7 (88), [Online], available at: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/12053 (Accessed 15 November 2021).
  38. Karavaev, E.F. (2005), Deontic logic, Mathematical logic, A.I. Migunov, Y.A. Slinin, E.F. Karavaev (ed.), Saint Petersburg State University Publishing House.
  39. Karavaev, E.F. (2005), Once more time about the difficulties of constructing deontic logic, Logic research, Science Publishing House, Moscow, Issue 12, pp. 170–181.
  40. Karavaev, E.F. (1990), Semantics problems of temporal logic, Logic and epistemology, Leningrad State University Publishing House, Leningrad, pp. 119–128.
  41. Karavaev, E.F. (2002), Rationality of normative system and deontic logic, Modern logic: theory problems, history and applications in science: Proceedings of VIIth. All-Russian Scientific Conference, Saint Petersburg, 20–22 June, pp. 58–60.
  42. Quine, W.V.O. (2010), From a logical point of view. Nine logico-philosophical essays, Moscow Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  43. Kuehn, М. (2021), Kant: biography, Translated from English by A. Vasileva, К. Chepurina (ed.), “Delo” Publishing House, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia.
  44. Lakier, A.B. (1990), Russian heraldry, Book Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  45. La Rochefoucauld, de Fr. (2015), The Maximes, Azbuka-Аttikus Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  46. Lisaniuk, E.N. (2010), The evolution of the concepts regarding the deontic logic norms, Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Philosophy Series, vol. 8, Issue 1.
  47. Lossky, N.О. (1922), Logic. Part 2, Science and school Publishing House, Petrograd.
  48. Mikirtumov, I.B. (2014), The logic elements of Ernst Mally: object-theoretical basics and the problems of interpretation, Logic and philosophical studies, Saint Petersburg, Issue 12.
  49. Nepeyvoda, N.N. (1997), Applied logic. Textbook, Udmurt State University Publishing House, Izhevsk, Russia.
  50. Rotenberg, E.I. (2003), The picture “The Art of Painting” by Jan Vermeer van Delft, From the history of the western classical art, Collection of articles in accordance with the scientific conference materials, to commemorate the 80th years’ anniversary of Rotenberg E.I., Moscow, pp. 96–133.
  51. Donatien Alphonse François de Sade (2003), Marquis de Sade. Boudoir philosophy. Ernestina. Florville and Kurvalle. Double challenge. Entertaining stories, novellas and fabliaux, Translated from French, Prodolzhenie Zhizni Publishing House, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  52. Sologubov, A.M. (2004), World models and metaphors of argumentation, Kaliningrad University Bulletin, Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, pp. 27–33.
  53. Sologubov, A.M. (2004), World models and the last argumentation basics (as exemplified by the Kant texts), World models. Researches on logic, argumentations and history of philosophy: Collection of scientific articles, V.N. Bryushinkin (ed.), Kaliningrad State University Publishing House, Kaliningrad, pp. 109–118.
  54. Taleb, N.N. (2020), The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, 2nd Issue, Translated from English, Colibri, Azbuka-Аttikus, Moscow, Russia.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Zolotov E.s.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies