CURRENT TRENDS IN THE FUNCTIONING OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF AN INNOVATIVE ECONOMY
- Authors: Ivanenko L.V.1, Andreev O.S.2
-
Affiliations:
- Samara National Research University
- Samara State University of Economics
- Issue: Vol 11, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 49-57
- Section: ECONOMICS
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/eco/article/view/8135
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2020-11-3-49-57
- ID: 8135
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The proposed article considers the need to recognize the economic utility and social value of human resources, the development of which requires investment in comparison with other types of economic resources. The urgency of solving the problem of functioning of higher education system is dictated by the need to apply new approaches to the management of an educational institution. Successful companies focus their efforts on creating and developing a management system for educational institutions designed to work effectively with intellectual resources that are becoming less used today. All these circumstances explain the emergence of a special interest of scientists and practitioners in the management of intellectual capital and the effectiveness of the knowledge process. In this regard, there is a need for constant updating and change, which means that knowledge is always innovative. At the same time, the most interesting are the ways of transforming universities into a new type of organization focused on meeting the needs of the market, making a profit, developing innovative technologies, supporting high-tech research projects and managing them. Close interaction of business corporations with the University community, forms a diversified financial base, develops contacts with business, society and the state, and encourages the widespread use of initiative and support for innovation in the scientific and educational environment. The new conceptual approach has enriched the practice with progressive methods and technologies for managing people in a complex innovative environment. The priorities were flexible forms of labor use, continuous improvement of the quality of human resources, new approaches to organizing and stimulating labor, and addressing cultural and ethical factors of labor productivity and quality of life. The main components of scientific novelty are the regulation and mutual influence of the functioning infrastructure and the applied methodology of higher education.
About the authors
Larisa V. Ivanenko
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ivanenko_lv@mail.ru
doctor of Economics, professor of the Department of Human Resource Management
Russian FederationOleg S. Andreev
Samara State University of Economics
Email: andreevoleg1984@mail.ru
Candidate of Economic Sciences, associate professor of the Department of Economics, Organization and Strategy of Enterprise Development
Russian FederationReferences
- Kwiek K. Globalization and higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Evrope, 2011, no. 1, pp. 27–38. (In Russ.)
- Sadovnichiy V.A. Universities. Present. Future. Speech at the First International Conference of Universities of the CIS Countries «Universities and Society». Moscow, 2000, pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)
- Baidenko V.I. Main trends in higher education development: global and Bologna dimensions. Moscow: Issledovatel'skii tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2010, 352 p. (In Russ.)
- Atrashenko A.N. Openness and self-organization of educational systems. In: Development of the regional education system in the context of modernization. Tomsk: TGU, 2006, pp. 231–236. (In Russ.)
- Zvonnikov V.I. Quality of education, or something new about an old problem. Kachestvo obrazovaniia, 2016, no. 6, pp. 26–31. (In Russ.)
- Ivanova I.N. Mironova R.E. Reintegration ties in the field of education in the post-Soviet space. Povolzhskii torgovo-ekonomicheskii zhurnal, 2012, no. 3, pp. 98–110. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17779157. (In Russ.)
- Grin' A.M. University budgeting as a necessary condition for its economic sustainability. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2002, no. 4, pp. 23–32. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9208808. (In Russ.)
- Harrington J. Knowledge Management Excellence: The Art of Excelling in Knowledge Management, Book 4 in the five part, series The Five Pillars of Organizational Excellence, by H. James Harrington, PhD and Frank Voehl, Foreword by Donald S. Feigenbaum, PhD. Moscow: Standarty i kachestvo, 2008, 269 p. Available at: http://www.
- deming.ru/Books/SoverUprZnaniya.htm. (In Russ.)
- Pastukhov L. Knowledge management in education: international experience. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Political Science. Oriental Studies, 2012, no. 12 (266), pp. 56–59. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/upravlenie-znaniyami-v-obrazovanii-mezhdunarodnyy-opyt. (In Russ.)
- Pertaya M.V. The role of universities in the innovative development of Russian economy. Universum: Bulletin of the Herzen University, 2014, no. 2, pp. 104–115. Available at: https://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/2/2014_1/pertaya_1_14_104_115.pdf. (In Russ.)
- Burets Y.S. Evolution of the innovation process management models. Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2014, no. 4 (28), pp. 125–139. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22843408. (In Russ.)
- Lisinchuk K.A. Application of Triple Spiral Conception for Strengthening the Role of High Schools in Establishing the Unified Innovative Structure in Russia. Creative Economy, 2013, no. 3 (75), pp. 76–80. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18334/ce.7.3.4900. (In Russ.)