Systematization of theoretical foundations of neoinstitutionalism
- Authors: Tyukavkin N.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- the Dept. of Economy, Samara State University, Samara, 443011, Russian Federation.
- Issue: Vol 6, No 9/1 (2015)
- Pages: 209-216
- Section: ECONOMICS
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/eco/article/view/5775
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2015-0-9/1-209-216
- ID: 5775
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Inability of classical economic theory that gives little attention to the investigation of institutional environment of activity of subjects of economy, gave rise to the appearing in the last century of a new economic school (new direction in economic science) that is called instutional economic theory. The founder of transformation in sociological researches of historicism in institutionalism is justly considered the economist of the USA – Veblen Th. (1857–1929), and the most prominent scientists in this area are the economists: of Great Britain – Gibson J. (1858–1940), of Russia – Bogdanov A.A. (1873–1928), of the USA – Mitchell W. (1874–1948), Commons J. (1862–1945), Schumpeter J. (1883–1950), Coase R. (1910–2013), Buchanan J. (1854–1934), Becker G. (1930-2014), Pozner R. (1939) and of Germany Eucken W. (1891–1950).
About the authors
N. M. Tyukavkin
the Dept. of Economy, Samara State University, Samara, 443011, Russian Federation.
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov.sv@ssau.ru
References
- Bakhareva T.V. Firm as a polymorphous institute of modern economic paradigm. Novyi
- universitet [New university], [in Russian].
- Dzagurova N.B. Institutional economics. Moscow, «Znanie», 2008, Vol. 21 [in Russian].
- Kapelyushnikov R.I. Neoinstitutionalism. Otechestvennye zapiski. Sobstvennost’: opyt
- osmysleniia [Domestic notes. Property: experience of appregension]. M., 2004, no. [in Russian].
- Korneva E.V. Analysis of evolution of institutional theory. M., Izd-vo «Delo», 2013, pp. 218–
- [in Russian].
- Martishin E.M. Evolution theory – basis of modern paradigm «synthesis» in economic
- science. TERRAECONOMICUS, [in Russian].
- Moskovsky A.V. Limits of institutionalism. Ekonomist [Economist], 2005, no. 6,
- pp. 74–[in Russian]/
- Nesterenko A.N. Economics and institutional theory. L.I. Abalkin (Ed.). M., Editorial
- URSS, 2002, p., pp. 112–114 [in Russian].
- Tyukavkin N.M. Strategic direction of development of subjects of market economy.
- Zhurn. ekon. teorii [Journal of economic theory]. Ekaterinburg, 2007, no. 3, pp. 58–[in Russian].
- Shastitko A.E. Economic theory of institutes. M., Ekon. fakul’tet MGU, TEIS, 1997 [in Russian].
- Schumpeter J.A. Theory of economic development. M., Progress, 1982 [in Russian].
- Khass D. Sociological neoinstitutionalism and analysis of organizations (introductory
- note to the section). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 8: Menedzhment [Vestnik
- of Saint–Petersburg University. Series 8: «Management»], 2007, no. 3, pp. 112–[in Russian].
- Coase Ronald (1937). “The Nature of the Firm”. Economica (Blackwell Publishing).
- (16): 386–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x [in English]
- Demsetz H. Efficiency, Competition, and Policy. Vol. I-II. Oxford, 1988, p. 164–184
- [in English].
- North C. Structure and Change in Economic History. N.Y., 1981, p. 335 [in English].
- Williamson E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational
- Contracting. N.Y., [in English].
Supplementary files
![](/img/style/loading.gif)