Digital economy: the core and the periphery


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In this article there have been analyzed different classification criteria of the modern economy. It has been established that the economy of the 21st century is characterized by a certain degree of digitalization. The influence of the digital technologies on the development of the economy is analyzed in accordance with the degree of digital technologies used in economic processes. The uneven nature of digitalization has been established at various levels: global, national and sectoral. As a result of the uneven nature development of the digital economy, two sectors of this economy have been pointed out. They may be identified as the “core” and “periphery” of the digital economy. It has been revealed that the differences between the core and the periphery of the digital economy are generally due to the elements’ specific character of the working environment (manufacturing situation). There have been determined the key differences within the scope of the basic elements referring to the manufacturing situation of the core and periphery: the amount of earnings, working conditions, working hours.

About the authors

Sergey Zolotov

National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N.I. Lobachevsky

Author for correspondence.
Email: szolotov96@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4650-6723

PhD student, junior researcher of the Economics of Enterprises and Organizations department

Russian Federation, 23, Gagarin Avenue, Nizhny Novgorod, 603022, Russian Federation.

References

  1. Glaveski, S. (2018), The case for the 6 – hour workday. Harvard Business Review from 18th December 2018, [Online], available at: https://hbr.org/2018/12/the-case-for-the-6-hour-workday (Accessed 9 April 2022).
  2. Newport C. Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World. Grand Central Publishing; Unabridged edition (January 5, 2016).
  3. Tapscott, D. (2015), The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, UK.
  4. Report «pishhevaja promyshlennost'», [Online], available at: https://spravochnik.rosmintrud.ru/storage/app/media/Pishevaya%20ppomeshlennoct_2019.pdf (Accessed 20 April 2022).
  5. Baeva, I. (2018), Gibkij mir kak hotjat rabotat' v Shveshhii i Anglii, Forbes from 17.08.2018, [Online], available at: https://www.forbes.ru/karera-i-svoy-biznes/365853-gibkiy-mir-kak-hotyat-rabotat-v-shvecii-anglii-i-rossii (Accessed 9 April 2022).
  6. Belousov, J.V. and Timofeeva, O.I. (2019), Metodology of digital economy definition, The world of new economy, no. 13 (4), pp. 79–89.
  7. Bocharov, V.U. (2009), Labor potential of farmers: the level of professional preparing, wealth and labor motivation, Vestnik samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 71, pp. 31–40.
  8. Vallerstajn, I. (2006), World system analysis: introduction, Izdatel'skij dom “Territorija budushhego” Serija “universitetskaja biblioteka Aleksandra Pogorel'skogo”, Moscow, Russia.
  9. Volosov, I. (2021), Digital sector in Russia: is the beginning of development? Interfax, [Online], available at: https://data.spark-interfax.ru/promo/articles/ikt_082021.pdf (Accessed 20 April 2022).
  10. Danilova, E.A. and Shhanina, E.V (2010), Youth in the regional society: theoretical aspect, Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Obshhestvennye nauki, no. 1, pp. 62–69.
  11. From self-organization to self-development: a change in the management paradigm, N.B. Akatov i dr pod red Komarova N.B. (2013), Institut jekonomiki Uro RAN, Ekaterinburgj, Russia.
  12. Lumpova, M.А. (2018), Problems and ways of Russian economy digitalization. World system analysis, Vestnik nauchnoj associacii studenvtov i aspirantov istoricheskogo fakul'teta permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seria: Stadia historica jenium, no. 1, pp. 127–137.
  13. Merzljakova, I.L. (2018), Features of the socio-cultural modernization of Russia in the context of information society formation, KANT, no. 2 (27), pp. 196–199.
  14. Smirnov, А.V. (2021), Digital society: theoretical model vs Russian reality, Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: social'nye i jekonomcheskie peremeny, no. 1, pp. 129–153.
  15. Trofimov, O.V., Zolotov, S.A. and Ezhov, A.S. (2020), The mode of work as a motivator of labor activity of workers on the example of a food industry enterprise, Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im.N.I. Lobachevskogoj. Serija social'nye naukij, no. 3 (59), pp. 32–39.
  16. Tagarov, B.J. (2021), Assessment concentration of level production in the manufacturing industry of Russia in context of economy digitalization, Baikal Research Journal, no. 1, pp. 17.
  17. Programme «Russian digital economy», [Online], available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf (Accessed 17 April 2022).
  18. Stepanov, V.G. and Kolesnik, E.A. (2021), Social conflict and tension in society in the context of the urban digitalization project implementation "Smart city", Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij Sociologija, jekonomika, politikaj, no. 1, pp. 115–130.
  19. Lobachevsky State University official website [Online], available at: http://www.itmm.unn.ru/novosti/rating-it-2018 (Accessed 20 April 2022).
  20. “C-news” [Online], available at: https://www.cnews.ru/news/top/2021-08-18_zarplata_itspetsialista (Accessed 20 April 2022).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Zolotov S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies