OBLIGATIONS ARISING AS CONSEQUENCE OF CAUSING HARM: DOCTRINAL DIFFERENTIATION CHARACTERISTICS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the article the author offers various doctrinal differentiation

characteristics of obligations arising as consequence of causing

harm to divide them on types. As the basic classification the

author considers the division of such obligations into obligations,

in which compensation of harm is in the capacity of civil liability

measure (arising as consequence of injury), and obligations as a

remedy (arising as consequence of lawful action).

About the authors

E. V. Ruzanova

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru

References

  1. Novitsky I.B., Luntz L.A. Obshchee uchenie ob obiazatel’stve [General doctrine of the
  2. obligation]. M.: Gosiurizdat, 1950, p. [in Russian].
  3. Ioffe O.S. Razvitie tsivilisticheskoi mysli v SSSR [Development of civil law thought in the USSR]. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1978, Part 2, 880 p. [in Russian].
  4. Обязательства вследствие причинения вреда:
  5. доктринальные основания дифференциации
  6. Юридический вестник Самарского университета. 2017. Т. 3. № 1
  7. Nevzgodina E.L. Vnedogovornye okhranitel’nye obiazatel’stva: ucheb. posobie. Pod red. prof.
  8. M.Iu. Fedorovoi [Рrotective non-contractual obligations: work book. Fedorova M.Yu. (Ed.)]. Omsk:
  9. Izd-vo Om. gos. un-ta, 2008, p. [in Russian].
  10. Krasavchikov O.A. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti
  11. [Compensation for damage caused by source of increased danger]. M.: Iurid. lit., 1966, p.
  12. [in Russian].
  13. Oyugenziht V.A. Problema riska v grazhdanskom prave [Problem of risk in civil law]. Dushanbe:
  14. IRFON, 1972, p. [in Russian].
  15. Rossiiskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: V 2 t. T. 2. Obiazatel’stvennoe pravo. Otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov [Russian civil law: textbook: in 2 Vols. Vol. 2: Liability law. Sukhanov E.A. (Ed.)]. M.: Statut, 2010, 1208 p. [in Russian].
  16. Weddle D.B. Bullying in schools: the disconnect between empirical research and constitutional,
  17. statuary, and the tort duties to supervise. Temple Law Review, 2004, Vol. 77, pp. 641–[in English].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Ruzanova E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies