Editorial Policies

Aims and Scope

Remit of the journal, milestones, groups of specialties:

entry

Naming of the heading / division of peer-reviewed scientific publication

Branches of science, and/or groups of specialties of scientific workers in correspondence with the Nomenclature of scientific specialties, by which academic titles are awarded

1

Theory of law and state

12.00.01 Theory and history of law and state; history of studies on law and state

2

History of law and state

12.00.01 Theory and history of law and state; history of studies on law and state

3

Constitutional law

12.00.02 Constitutional law, constitutional judicial proceedings, municipal law

4

Municipal law

12.00.02 Constitutional law, constitutional judicial proceedings, municipal law

5

Civil law

12.00.03 Civil law; entrepreneurial law; family law; private international law

6

Family and housing law

12.00.03 Civil law; entrepreneurial law; family law; private international law

7

Entrepreneurial and economic law

12.00.03 Civil law; entrepreneurial law; family law; private international law

8

Private international law

12.00.03 Civil law; entrepreneurial law; family law; private international law

9

Financial and banking law

12.00.04 Financial law; fiscal law; budgetary law

 

10

Labour law and social security law

 

12.00.05 Labour law; social security law

11

Environmental and land law

12.00.06 Land law; natural resources law; environmental law; agricultural law

12

Corporate and energy law

 

12.00.07 Corporate law;

energy law

 

13


Criminal law

 

12.00.08 Criminal law and criminal science; criminal and penal law

14

Criminal science

 

12.00.08 Criminal law and criminal science; criminal and penal law

15

Criminal and penal law

12.00.08 Criminal law and criminal science; criminal and penal law

16

Criminal procedure

12.00.09 Criminal procedure

17

International law

12.00.10 International law; European law

18

Advocacy and law enforcement activities

12.00.11 Judicial activity, public prosecutor’s activity, advocacy and law enforcement activities

19

Criminalistics and forensic enquiry

 

12.00.12 Criminalistics; judicial and examination activities; investigative activities

20

Information law

12.00.13 Information law

21

Administrative law and process

12.00.14 Administrative law and administrative process

22

Civil process

12.00.15 Civil process; arbitration proceedings

23

Arbitration proceedings

12.00.15 Civil process; arbitration proceedings

24

Legal education

 

12.00.01 Theory and history of state and law; history of studies on law and state

12.00.02 Constitutional law, constitutional judicial proceedings, municipal law

12.00.03 Civil law; entrepreneurial law; family law; private international law

12.00.04 Financial law; fiscal law; budgetary law

12.00.05 Labour law; social security law

12.00.06 Landlaw; natural resources law; environmental law; agricultural law

12.00.07 Company law; energy law

12.00.08 Criminal law and criminal science; criminal and penal law

12.00.09 Criminal procedure

12.00.10 International law; European law

12.00.11 Judicial activity, public prosecutor’s activity, advocacy and law enforcement activities

12.00.12 Criminalistics; judicial and examination activities; investigative activities

12.00.13 Information law

12.00.14 Administrative law and administrative process

12.00.15 Civil process; arbitration proceedings

25

Tribune of young scientist

26

Personalia

27

Reviews

28

Events

 

 

 

Sections

Theory of law and state

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

History of law and state

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Ethics and psychology of law-enforcement activity

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Constitutional law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Municipal law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Administrative law and process

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Environmental and land law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Civil law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Family and housing law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Labour law and social security law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Civil process

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Arbitration proceedings

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Entrepreneurial and economic law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Financial and banking law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Criminal law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Criminal science

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Criminal and penal law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Criminal procedure

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Criminalistics and forensic enquiry

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

International law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Private international law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Corporate and energy law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Information law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Legal education

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Tribune of young scientist

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Personalia

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Events

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Competency, efficiency, confidentiality, objectivity, disaffection

Order

of direction, peer review and publishing of articles in the scientific journal «Juridical Journal of Samara University»

 

3.1Articles in the scientific journal «JURIDICAL JOURNAL OF SAMARA UNIVERSITY» are filled out in accordance with the «Requirements to the design of articles» that are placed in the end of each issue of the journal and on the website of the journal. Articles that are presented with the violation of the before-mentioned requirements are not considered.

3.2. The articles are sent to the editorial staff of the journal in the electronic form from the personal e-mail of the author on the e-mail: jjournal@inbox.ru

3.3. All presented in the scientific journal articles are recorded in the registration log by the executive editor with the indication of date of entry in the editorial staff.

3.4. After registration scientific articles are delivered through the executive editor or publishing editor of series on peer review. In the registration log the information about the reader selected by the editorial board or by the editorial team of the journal is put. The term of peer review is 1–2 month.

3.5. Inthe article only those articles that are viewed and recommended to the publication are published. In the capacity of readers, expert scientists in the given area, having publication on the given subject for the period of the last 3 years, that give substantiated conclusion about scientific value of the presented material and its correspondence to the requirements of the journal.

3.6. If in the peer review on the article there is indication on the necessity of its refinement by the author, it is send to the author for correction of drawbacks or inaccuracies indicated by the reader.

3.7. At positive review authors by email are sent confirmation about the inclusion of an article in the corresponding issue of the journal.

3.8. At negative review the article according to the decision of the editorial board is rejected. In the registration log after getting review the corresponding mark «Publish», «For renewal», «Reject» is placed.

3.9. The articles are published as a rule in the order of precedence of their entry. If the article is sent to the author for renewal, then the final version of the paper is published in the next, from the moment of entry of the improved article, issue of the journal. The editorial board of the journal has a right to change the priority of publication of the articles.

3.10. Incase if the editorial board doesn’t share fully the viewpoint of the author of the published article, it has a right to make a footnote about this. Articles published in the course of discussion can also be accompanied by a footnote.

3.11. The editorial board has a right to publish letters of the readers that contain substantiated estimate of the published articles.

3.12. Copies of positive as well as negative reviews without indication of the family name of the reader are sent to the authors of the articles

3.13. The copies of the reviews are sent to the Ministry of Education and Science of theRussian Federationat entry of the request therefore in the editorial department

3.14. Reviews on the articles are kept for 5 years.

 

Open Access Policy

Статьи этого журнала доступны всем желающим с момента публикации, что обеспечивает свободный открытый доступ к результатам исследований и способствует прогрессу науки и медицины.

 

Archiving

The journal uses the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN) to digitally preserve all the published articles. The PKP PN is a part of LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) program offers decentralized and distributed preservation, seamless perpetual access, and preservation of the authentic original version of the content.

Also, the journal makes full-text archives on the Russian Science Electronic Library (http://elibrary.ru/) platform.

 

Publication Ethics

 Ethical norms of scientific publications assume observation by the participants of scientific and publishing community of certain general principles and rules of interaction, that serve enhancement of a number of qualitative scientific publications and also successful and effective cooperation of authors, reviewers, publishers and readers of scientific publications.

    1. In the process of cooperation, authors, reviewers, publishers and readers of scientific publications should be polite, tactful, avoid conflict situations, solving the questions aroused in creative, constructive and productive spring.

    2. Deliberate assignment of authorship of an alien work of science, alien ideas and inventions, fraud of data is not allowed. Plagiarism is a violation of author-legal and patent legislation and may lead to legal responsibility.

    3. The article should be original, contain element of new knowledge and be given for publication for the first time.

    4. Non published data, received from manuscript presented to consideration should not be used or given to the third person without written author’s consent. Information or ideas received in the process of peer-reviewing and editorship and connected with potential dividends, should remain confidential and not used with the aim of getting self-profit.

    5. Author (or group of authors) of publication have responsibility for novelty and authenticity of results of scientific research. Borrowed fragments or statements should be formed with the obligatory indication of an author and primary source of information. Excessive borrowings, and also plagiarism in any form, including unshaped citations, paraphrasing or assignment of rights on the results of alien researches, are unethical and unacceptable.

    6. Co-authors of the article should indicate all persons that brought in a substantial contribution in carrying out research.

    7. Author has a right to be acquainted with the results of peer-reviewing and comments of the reviewer and remove mistakes required by a reviewer or an editor.

    8. If an author finds substantial errors or mistakes in the article on the stage of its reviewing or after its publishing, he should as quickly as possible inform about it the journal staff.

    9. Reviewer carries out scientific expertise of author’s materials, regarding them as confidential document which should not be given for acquaintance or consideration to the third person that have no rights for it from the editorial staff.

    10. Reviewer must give objective and substantiated estimate to the stated results of an investigation. Personal critique of an author is unacceptable.

    11. The anonymity of reviewer must be observed.

    12. Reviewer that doesn’t have, according to his opinion, competence for estimation of a manuscript or cannot be impersonal, should tell the publisher about it with a request to exclude him from the process of peer reviewing of the given manuscript.

    13. Publisher of a scientific journal at decision taking about publication goes by the authenticity of data presentation and scholarly importance of the considered work

    14. Publisher should evaluate intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, nationality, social standing or political preferences of the authors.

    15. Copy editor combined with publisher should not leave without an answer accusations that concern the viewed manuscripts or published materials, and also at revelation of conflict situation take all necessary measures for restoration of violated rights.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies