REMOTE INTERACTION WITH THE JUDICIARY IN A PANDEMIC: OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSPECTIVES

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of implementing forms of remote interaction with the judicial system. The article also considers the possibility of functioning of the judicial system in the current unfavourable epidemiological situation and quarantine measures being carried out in the country. The author analyzes the problems and prospects of remote interaction of the court with the participants in the process, as well as the problems of their application in conditions of insufficient legal regulation. There are 3 main forms of remote interaction with courts: submission of documents, which is more focused on professional participants in the process; familiarization with the materials of the case, which is implemented electronically only in the arbitration process and only in cases considered in summary proceedings; remote participation in the consideration of a case, which at the moment is practically not implemented due to the lack of proper legal regulation. A comparative analysis of foreign judicial practice and legal norms governing remote interaction with judicial authorities with the established practice of the judicial system of the Russian Federation was carried out. In conclusion, the author concluded the study.

About the authors

Z. S. Lebedev

Non-profit organization Antonov & Partners Law Firm; Depаrtment of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Barasheva E. V. Problemy realizatsii prava invalida na dostupnuiu sredu [Problems of implementation of the right to the disabled on the available environment]. Glagol" pravosudiia, 2017, no. 1 (13), pp. 5–8. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29029249 [in Russian].
  2. Naumenko E. Spory cherez Skype i Zoom: kak rabotaiut sudy pri koronaviruse [Disputes through Skype and Zoom: how the courts work in coronavirus]. Available at: https://pravo.ru/story/220052 (accessed 25.05.2020) [in Russian].
  3. Romanov A. A. Sudebnoe predstavitel'stvo v stranakh anglosaksonskoi pravovoi traditsii i v Rossii v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Judicial representation in a civil procedure in countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal
  4. tradition and Russia]. Rossiiskii sud'ia [Russian Judge], 2018, no. 10, pp. 15–Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36290342 [in Russian].
  5. Vystuplenie Predsedatelia Soveta sudei Rossiiskoi Federatsii V. V. Momotova na plenarnom zasedanii Soveta sudei Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Address by V. V. Momotov, Chairman of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation, at the plenary meeting of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation]. Sud'ia [Judge], 2018, no. 7, pp. 12–20. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36535384 [in Russian].
  6. Mutovina T. S. O distantsionnoi podache iskovogo zaiavleniia [On elctronic submission of the claims]. Biulleten' nauki i praktiki [Bulletin of Science and Practice], 2018, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 537–540. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2278321 [in Russian].
  7. Creighton A. An adversarial system: a constitutional requirement? Australian Law Reform Commission Reform Journal, 1999, no. 74, pp. 65–67.
  8. High Court Amendment (Electronic Filing and Other Matters) Rules 2019. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L01677 (accessed 24.05.2020) [in Russian].
  9. Kondyurina U. A. Dostupnost' pravosudiia kak uslovie effektivnosti sistemy elektronnogo sudoproizvodstva [Availability of justice as a condition for the effectiveness of the system of electronic legal proceedings]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia «Pravo» [Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law»], 2016, no. 3 (48), pp. 131–140. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26726341 [in Russian].
  10. Prizhennikova A. N. Tsifrovizatsiia pravosudiia: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [The digitalization of justice: theoretical and practical aspects]. [Education and law], 2020, no. 2, pp. 287–297. DOI: http//doi.org/10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10348 [in Russian].
  11. Lazareva V. A., Kuvaldina Yu. V. Nadlezhashchii vyzov podsudimogo: aktual'naia problema [Proper call of the defendant: an urgent problem]. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia [Russian Justitia], 2009, no. 4, pp. 63–65. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18926188 [in Russian].
  12. Sheremetev I. I. Ispol'zovanie tsifrovykh tekhnologii pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v sude: real'nost' i perspektivy [Using digital technologies in criminal cases in court: reality and prospects]. Lex Russica, 2019, no. 5 (150), pp. 117–131. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.150.5.117-131 [in Russian].
  13. Rudneva Yu. V. Kavkaeva J. A. Elektronnoe pravosudie v grazhdanskom protsesse [Electronic justice in the civil process]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2019, no. 1, pp. 23–25. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2018-10502 [in Russian].
  14. Ivanova A. S. Primenenie informatsionnykh tekhnologii v deiatel'nosti sudov pri proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam [Application of information technologies in the activity of courts in criminal proceedings]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2019, no. 1, pp. 91–103. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11722 [in Russian].
  15. Chernyshev V. I. Ispol'zovanie elektronnykh sredstv v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Using of electronic facilities in commercial courts]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia «Pravo» [Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law»], 2017, no. 3, pp. 105–135. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16558104 [in Russian].
  16. Laptev V. A., Solovyanenko N. I. Elektronnoe pravosudie i elektronnyi dokumentooborot kak uslovie modernizatsii reguliatornoi sredy dlia biznesa [E-justice and electronic document management as a condition for modernization of regulatory business environment]. Rossiiskii sud'ia [Russian Judge], 2017, no. 2, pp. 16–21. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2017-2-16-21.
  17. Makarova O. V. Sovershenstvovanie sudoproizvodstva putem vnedreniia elektronnoi formy ugolovnogo dela [The improvement of criminal proceedings by introducing an electronic form of a criminal case].
  18. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2019, no. (266), pp. 159–168. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12737/art_2019_2_15 [in Russian].
  19. Zuev S. V. Elektronnoe ugolovnoe delo: za i protiv [Electronic criminal case: for and against]. Pravoporiadok: istoriia, teoriia, praktika [Legal Order: history, theory, practice], 2018, no. 4 (19), pp. 6–12. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36547539 [in Russian].
  20. ZazulinA.I. Normativnoe obespechenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: opyt FRG [Legal regulation of electronic documentation in criminal procedure: German experience]. Pravoporiadok: istoriia, teoriia, praktika [Legal Order: history, theory, practice], 2018, no. 4 (19), pp. 76–80. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36547553 [in Russian].
  21. Muromskaya Yu. V., Baturina N. A. Elektronnaia forma sudoproizvodstva za rubezhom [Electronic form of litigation abroad]. Innovatsionnaia nauka, 2019, no. 4, pp. 136–140, p. 138. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37335366 [in Russian].
  22. Sviridova M. V. «Elektronnoe pravosudie» kak poisk mekhanizmov obespecheniia sovremennoi rossiiskoi demokratii: problemy i protivorechiia zakonodatel'stva [«Electronic justice» as the search of mechanisms of the modern Russian democracy support: problems and
  23. contradictions of legislation]. Iurist"-Pravoved" [JuristPravoved], 2017, no. (81), pp. 5–9. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29680534 [in Russian].
  24. Tishchenko A. V. Elektronnoe pravosudie: sudebnoe reformirovanie k 2020 godu [E-justice: judicial reform to 2020]. Pravoporiadok: istoriia, teoriia, praktika [Legal Order: history, theory, practice], 2018, no. 4, pp. 65–69. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36547551 [in Russian].
  25. Levchenko O. A. Sud kak glavnaia garantiia pravovogo gosudarstva [Court as the main guarantee of the rule of law]. Innovatsionnaia nauka, 2015, no. 1, pp. 40–59. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sud-kak-glavnaya-garantiya-pravovogo-gosudarstva [in Russian].
  26. Momotov V. Tsifrovizatsiia ne dolzhna pregrazhdat' dostup k pravosudiiu [Digitalization should not block access to justice]. Advokatskaia gazeta, 2019, December 4. Available at: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/viktor-momotov-tsifrovizatsiya-ne-dolzhna-pregrazhdat-dostup-k-pravosudiyu (accessed 03.05.2020) [in Russian].
  27. Bryantseva O. V. Soldatkina O. L. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii: problemy i puti resheniia [E-justice in Russia: problems and solutions]. Vestnik universiteta im. O. E. Kutafina (MGIuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)], 2019, no. 12 (64), pp. 97–104. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.64.12.097-104 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2020 Lebedev Z.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies