NOVELTIES OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONCERNING REFUSAL OF JURISDICTION
- Authors: Agalarova M.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Civil Procedure and Business Law, Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 6, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 40-45
- Section: Civil process
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/8108
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-3-40-45
- ID: 8108
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In this article, the author touches upon the recent changes made by the Federal Law dated 28.11.2018 № 451-FZ «On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation» related to the rejection of the term «jurisdiction». The reasons for such changes, as well as positive and negative features of the replacement of «jurisdiction» by «competence» are investigated. The author analyzes the legal meaning of each concept – «jurisdiction» and «competence». The problem of impact of such changes on the «international jurisdiction», which arises in the course of consideration and resolution of civil cases involving foreign persons in civil and arbitration processes, is noted.
About the authors
M. A. Agalarova
Department of Civil Procedure and Business Law, Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Smagina E. S. Zavershena li protsessual'naya revolyutsiya? [Is the «procedural revolution» completed?]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of Civil Procedure], 2019, no. 4, pp. 113–123. DOI: http://doi.
- org/24031/2226-0781-2019-9-4-113-123 [in Russian].
- Federal'nyy zakon ot 28.11.2018. № 451-FZ (red. ot 17.10.2019) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Federal Law № 451-FZ dated 28.11.2018 (last updated 17.10.2019) «On Amendments Being Made to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation»]. Access from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_312093/ [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 03.10.2017 g. № 30 «O vnesenii v Gosudarstvennuyu Dumu Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii proekta federal'nogo zakona “O vnesenii izmeneniy v Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Arbitrazhnyy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Kodeks
- administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii”» [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court dated 10.2017 № 30 «On inclusion into the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the draft of the Federal Law “On amendments being made to the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation”»]. Access from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://legalacts.ru/sud/postanovlenie-plenuma-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-03102017-n-30 [in Russian].
- Bekyasheva D. I. Otkaz zakonodatelya ot termina «podvedomstvennost'», ili Uyazvimye pravila «novoy» podsudnosti: chto dal'she? [Legislator's refusal of the term «jurisdiction» or Vulnerable rules of «new» jurisdiction: what's next?]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
- [Herald of Civil Procedure], 2019, no. 3, pp 126–DOI: http://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-3-126-143 [in Russian].
- Osipov Yu. K. Podvedomstvennost' yuridicheskikh del: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Jurisdiction of legal cases: author's abstract of Doctoral of Legal Sciences thesis]. Sverdlovsk, 1974, 36 p. Available at: http://www.prlib.ru/item/358072 [in Russian].
- Yarkov V. V. Osnovnye kriterii podvedomstvennosti [Main criterions of jurisdiction]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2007, no. 8, pp 11–16. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12879574 [in Russian].
- Ivanov A. V. Deyatel'nost' arbitrazhnykh sudov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po rassmotreniyu del, voznikayushchikh iz administrativnykh i inykh publichnykh pravootnosheniy [Activity of arbitration courts of the Russian Federation on consideration of the cases arising from administrative and other public legal relations]. In: Antologiya nauchnoy mysli: K 10-letiyu Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya: sbornik statey [Anthology of scientific thought: On the 10th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Justice: collected papers]. Moscow: Izd-vo Statut, 2008, pp. 426–444. Available at: http://yandex.ru/turbo/s/wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/32442-deyatelnost-arbitrazhnykh-sudov-rossijskoj-federacii-rassmotreniyu-voznikayushhikh [in Russian].
- Zhuikov V. M. Sudebnaya zashchita prav grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits [Judicial protection of the rights of citizens and legal entities]. Moscow: Gorodets, 1997, 320 p. [in Russian].
- Zhilin G. A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual'nye voprosy: monografi ya [Justice in civil cases: topical issues: monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2010, 576 p. Available at: http://historich.ru/monografiya-jiling-a/index.html [in Russian].
- Valeev D. Kh. Podvedomstvennost' grazhdanskikh del sudam obshchey yurisdiktsii [Jurisdiction of civil cases to courts of general jurisdiction]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern Law], 2010, no. 5, pp 109–113. Available at:http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15199520 [in Russian].
- Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Kamchatskogo kraya ot 9 oktyabrya 2019 g. Delo № A24-6022/2019 [Decision of the Kamchatka Territory Arbitration Court dated October 9, 2019. Case № A24-6022/2019. Available at: http://sudact.ru/ (accessed 12.02.2020) [in Russian].
- Reshenie Votkinskogo rayonnogo suda (Udmurtskaya Respublika) № 744/2019 ot 30 avgusta 2019 g. Delo № 2-992/2019 [Decision of the Votkinsk district court (Udmurt Republic) № 744/2019 dated August 30, 2019. Case № 2-992/2019. Available at: http://sudact.ru (accessed 13.02.2020) [in Russian].
- Yarkov V. V. Razgranichenie predmetov vedeniya mezhdu sudami: klyuchevye novelly [Division of Jurisdictions between Courts: Key Novelties]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure], 2019, no. 7, pp. 31–37. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39171675 [in Russian].
- Yarkov V. V. Izmenenie pravil razgranicheniya predmetov vedeniya mezhdu sudami: novye slova i/ili novye resheniya? [Changing the rules for distinguishing the subjects of jurisdiction between courts: new words and / or new decisions?]. Zakon [Zakon], 2019, no. 4, pp. 92–103. Available at: http://igzakon.ru/magazine/article?id=7777 [in Russian].
- Baradanchenkova N. E. Novelly instituta podvedomstvennosti [Innovations of the Jurisdiction Institution]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure], 2017, no. 12, pp 24–25. Available at: http://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/100892-novelly-instituta-podvedomstvennosti [in Russian].
Supplementary files
