EVIDENCE AND SUBJECTS OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: RE-EVALUATION OF FORMED VIEWS
- Authors: Konin V.V.1, Korsakov K.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Criminal Procedure Law, North Western branch of the Russian State University of Justice (the city of Saint Petersburg)
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2020)
- Pages: 81-85
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/7925
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-2-81-85
- ID: 7925
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of topical issues of proof – the collection, verification and evaluation of evidence, as well as the subjects of proof in criminal proceedings. Evidence is central to criminal proceedings. Special attention should be paid to one of the most important elements of the proof process – the assessment of evidence carried out by the subjects of proof, since in procedural terms, it is the assessment of evidence that directly affects the formation of the court's internal conviction about the proof or lack of proof of the accusatory thesis put forward by the investigator and supported by the prosecutor. According to the authors, the subjects of proof in criminal proceedings are only those participants in the criminal process who have the right to independently collect, verify and evaluate evidence. All other participants in criminal proceedings, despite their procedural significance, who are not endowed with at least one of the listed rights, do not belong to the subjects of proof.
About the authors
V. V. Konin
Department of Criminal Procedure Law, North Western branch of the Russian State University of Justice (the city of Saint Petersburg)
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
K. A. Korsakov
Department of Criminal Procedure Law, North Western branch of the Russian State University of Justice (the city of Saint Petersburg)
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Osipova E. V., Kramarenko V. P. Ispol'zovanie situatsionnogo modelirovaniya v preodolenii sledstvennykh oshibok sudom [Using
- situational modeling in overcoming investigative errors by the court]. In: Situatsionnyy podkhod v yuridicheskoy nauke i praktike: sovremennye vozmozhnosti i perspektivy razvitiya: materialy Mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. konf., posvyashch. 15-letiyu nauchnoy shkoly kriminalisticheskoy situalogii BFU im. I. Kanta [Situational approach in legal science and practice: current opportunities and prospects for development: materials of the International research and practical conference dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the scientific school of criminalistic situalogy of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University], 2017, pp. 274–Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30491812 [in Russian].
- Rossinskiy S. B. O strukture ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya [About the Structure Working with Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Procedure]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice], 2017, no. 5, pp. 39–50. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29221664 [in Russian].
- Shaifer S. A., Nikolaeva K. A. K voprosu o strukture dokazyvaniya [On the structure of the burden of proof]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo [Tomsk State University Journal of Law], 2016, no. 2 (20), pp. 82–87. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/20/10 [in Russian].
- Korsakov K. A. Kontseptsiya poznavatel'nodokazatel'stvennoy deyatel'nosti [The concept of cognitiveevidentiary activity]. In: Nauchnaya shkola ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta: materialy konferentsiy. Pod redaktsiey N. P. Kirillovoy, S. P. Kushnirenko, N. G. Stoyko, V. Yu. Nizamova [Scientific school of criminal procedure and criminalistics of
- Saint Petersburg State University: conference proceedings. Kirillova N. P., Kushnirenko S. P., Stoiko N. G., Nizamov V. Yu. (Eds.)]. Moscow, 2019, pp. 152–Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41275073 [in Russian].
- Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa [Course of the Soviet criminal process]. Moscow: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1958, 703 p. [in Russian].
- Belkin R. S. Sobiranie, issledovanie i otsenka dokazatel'stv: Sushchnost' i metody [Collecting, research and evaluation of evidence: Essence and methods]. Moscow: Nauka, 1966, 295 p. [in Russian].
- Zinatullin Z. Z. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe dokazyvanie: Kontseptual'nye osnovy: [Criminal procedural proof]. Izhevsk: Detektiv-inform, 2003, 227 p. [in Russian].
- Marina E. V. Osnovnye problemy, voznikayushchie pri sobiranii dokazatel'stv po korruptsionnym prestupleniyam [Main problems that arise when collecting evidence on corruption crimes]. In: Materialy XXIV mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. konf. «Deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov v sovremennykh usloviyakh» [Materials of the XXIV international research and practical conference «Law enforcement activities in modern
- conditions»]. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2019, pp. 147–Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38050196 [in Russian].
- Konin V. V. Standart zashchity v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: sovety advokatam [Standard of defense in criminal proceedings: advices to advocates]. Ugolovnyy protsess, 2018, no. 2 (158), pp. 80–87. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32399773 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
