FAIRNESS AND ABUSE OF INTEREST IN VALIDITY OF MARRIAGE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article demonstrates the interconnection and interdependence of the good faith of persons entering into marriage, and the recognition by the state of the reality of a marriage union. A new look at the status of a bona fide spouse is presented, the ratio of spouse’s good faith behavior and misuse of interest in marriage is established. Parallels were made between the principle of good faith in civil matters and the presumption of good faith of spouses as subjects of family relations, the validity of which is challenged in court.

About the authors

O. N. Zamriy

Department of Сivil Procedure and Law Enforcement Activity, Tver State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Ilina O. Yu. Sistema koordinat v semeinykh pravootnosheniyakh: interes kak predposylka smeshcheniya parametrov [The coordinate system in family relationships: interest as a prerequisite for the offset parameter]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo
  2. universiteta. Seriya «Pravo» [Herald of Tver State University. Series: Pravo], 2018, no. 3, pp. 13–Available at: http://vestnik.tversu.ru/journals/3/documen ts/526/%D0%92%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD %D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D 0%B2%D0%BE_3-2018.pdf?1539848762 [in Russian].
  3. Bespalov Yu. F., Gordeyuk E. V. Ukreplenie rossiiskoi sem’i, osnovannoi na brake, i svoboda brachnogo soyuza: problemy semeinogo zakonodatel’stva [Consolidation of the Russian family, based on marriage and freedom of marriage: the problem of the family law of the Russian Federation]. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika [Law and State: The Theory and Practice], 2016, no. 10, pp. 86–90. Available at: http://prigospress.ucoz. ru/index/arkhiv_pig_2016_10_1/0-336 [in Russian].
  4. Gabitov I. M., Sharafullina R. R. Brak kak forma kontrakta [Marriage as a form of contract]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Eurasian Law Journal], 2017, no. 7, pp. 321–323. Available at: https://eurasialaw.ru/ en/2017/7-110-2017 [in Russian].
  5. Ksenofontova D. S. Printsip garantirovannogo osushchestvleniya semeinykh prav i ispolneniya obyazannostei v sfere alimentirovaniya [Principle of guaranteed effectuation of family rights and performance of obligations in the sphere of alimony]. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo [Family and Housing Law], 2015, no. 1, pp. 36–39. Available at: http:// lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2015/semejnoe-i-zhilischnoepravo/1/ [in Russian].
  6. Kulakov V. V. Printsipy semeinogo prava [Principles of Family Law]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law], 2017, no 5(78), pp. 16–20. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.78.5.016-020 [in Russian].
  7. Bespalov A. Yu. Nedeistvitelnost’ braka v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Nekotorye material’no- i protsessual’no-pravovye aspekty [Invalidity of marriage in the Russian Federation. Some substantive and procedural legal aspects]. M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2011. Available at: https://rucont.ru/efd/352367 [in Russian].
  8. Panichkin V. B., Panichkina E. V. Predposylki i sposoby institutsionalizatsii sozhitelstva v brak v rossiiskom prave [Prerequisites and Means of Institutionalization of Cohabitation into Marriage in Russian Law]. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo [Family and Housing Law], 2017, no. 4, pp. 18–24. Available at: http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2017/semejnoe-izhilischnoe-pravo/4/ [in Russian].
  9. Zamriy O. N. Fiktivnost’ v fakticheskikh brachnykh otnosheniyakh: soderzhanie i formy interesov [Fictitious in actual marital relations: the content and the form of interest]. Severo-Kavkazskii yuridicheskii vestnik [North Caucasus Legal Vestnik], 2017, no. 2, pp. 66–70. Available at: http://vestnik.uriu.ranepa.ru/2017/07/05/ fiktivnost-v-fakticheskix-brachnyx-otnosheniyaxsoderzhanie-i-formy-interesov/ [in Russian].
  10. Koludarova S. V. Braki s migrantami v rossiiskom obshchestve [Marriages with Migrants in Russian Society]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social policy and sociology], 2017, no. 3, pp. 105–111. doi: 10.17922/2071-3665-2017-16-3-105-111 [in Russian].
  11. Yakushev P. A. Obeshchanie vstupit’ v brak i posledstviya ego nevypolneniya: predely pravovogo regulirovaniya v Rossii i stranakh Evropy [Promise of Marriage, and the Consequences of its Abandonment: Limits of Legal Regulation in Russia and Europe]. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo [Family and Housing Law], 2017, no. 2, pp. 22–25. Available at: http://lawinfo. ru/catalog/contents-2017/semejnoe-i-zhilischnoepravo/2 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Zamriy O.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies