DISCUSSION «TARASOV VS ROSSINSKIY» ABOUT DETENTION OF THE SUSPECT: SUMMING UP THE FIRST RESULTS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article describes the content of the author’s speech at the conference «Act of detention as evidence in criminal proceedings: Pros and Cons» (September 26, 2018, Samara National Research University, Faculty of Law). The author analyzes the reasons for the discussion «Tarasov vs Rossinskiy» between him and professor A. A. Tarasov about the nature of detention of a person suspected of committing a crime. The author concludes that detention actually remains a «police» act, which is used for maintaining proper investigation. And the procedural decision to detain does not have a «high» legal meaning, which is found in other resolutive acts of preliminary investigation.

About the authors

S. B. Rossinskiy

Criminal Procedure Department, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Astafiev Yu. V. Metodologicheskie osnovy sootnosheniya operativno-rozysknoi i dokazatel’stvennoi informatsii v rassledovanii prestuplenii [Methodological basis of correlation of operational-investigative and evidentiary information in the investigation of crimes]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya Pravo [Scientifi c journal. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law], 2007, no. 1, pp. 280–290. Available at: http://
  2. www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/pravo/2007/01/2007-01-pdf [in Russian].
  3. Berezin М. N., Gutkin I. М., Chuvilev А. А. Zaderzhanie v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Detention in Soviet criminal proceedings]. М.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1975, 93 p. [in Russian].
  4. Dolya Е. А. Formirovanie dokazatel’stv na osnove rezul’tatov operativno-rozysknoi deyatel’nosti [Formation of evidence based on the results of investigative activities]. М.: Prospekt, 2009, 374 p. Available at: https://studbooks.net/847199/pravo/ formirovanie_dokazatelstv_osnove_rezultatov_ operativno_rozysknoy_deyatelnosti [in Russian].
  5. Kovriga Z. F. Ugolovno-protsessual’noe prinuzhdenie [Criminal-procedural forcing]. Voronezh: Voronezhskii gosuniversitet, 1975, 175 p. Available at: https:// studref.com/315698/pravo/ugolovno_protsessualnoe_ prinuzhdenie [in Russian].
  6. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa. Pod red. L. V. Golovko [The course of the criminal process. L. V. Golovko (Ed.)]. М.: Statut, 2016, 1278 p. Available at: http://be5. biz/pravo/u010/index.html [in Russian].
  7. Livshits Y. D., Ginzburg А. Ya. Mery presecheniya i zaderzhanie v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Preventive measures and detention in the Soviet criminal process]. Alma-Ata: Alma-Atinskoe otdelenie FZO VSh MVD SSSR, 1961 [in Russian].
  8. Muravyev K. V. Mery ugolovno-protsessual’nogo prinuzhdeniya – osobye sredstva ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeistviya: doktrina, primenenie, optimizatsiya [Measures of procedural enforcement – specifi c actions of criminal enforcement: doctrine, application, optimization]. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2017, 228 p. Available at: http://www.iuaj.net/node/2226 [in Russian]. 8. Polyakov M. P. Ugolovno-protsessual’naya interpretatsiya rezul’tatov operativno-rozysknoi deyatel’nosti: dis. … dis. yurid. nauk [Criminal procedural interpretation of the results of operational investigative activities: Doctor’s of Laws thesis]. N. Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the MIA of Russia, 2002. 442 p. Available at: http://lawbook. org.ua/aa/12.00.09/2016/03/19/030529027.doc.html [in Russian].
  9. Rossinsky S. B. Diskussiya o sushchnosti i pravovoi prirode zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo prodolzhaetsya [Discussion about the Essence and Legal Nature of the Suspect’s Detention Continues]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law], 2018, no. 6, pp. 134–146. doi: 10.17803/19941471.2018.91.6.134-145 [in Russian].
  10. Rossinsky S. B. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo: konstitutsionno-mezhotraslevoi podkhod: monografi ya [Detention of the suspect: constitutional-inter-branch approach: monograph]. M.: Prospect, 2019, 192 p. doi: 10.31085/9785392288205-2019-192 [in Russian].
  11. Tarasov A. A. S. A. Sheifer o poznavatel’noi sushchnosti zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo [S. A. Sheifer about the cognitive essence of the detention of the suspected]. Yuridicheskii vestnik Samarskogo universiteta [Juridical journal of Samara University], 2017, no. 4, pp. 63–67. Available at: http://journals.ssau. ru/index.php/jjsu/article/view/6043 [in Russian].
  12. Schafer S. А. Sledstvennye deistviya. Sistema i protsessual’naya forma [Investigative activities. System and procedural form]. М.: Yurlitinform, 2001, 208 p. [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Rossinskiy S.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies