INQUIRY AS AN UNNECESSARY LINK IN THE DOMESTIC CRIMINAL PROCESS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of current situation of preliminary investigation. The redundancy of inquiry as an unnecessary link of domestic criminal process, copying the preliminary investigation, is substantiated. It is indicated that there is no advantage in the procedural form of inquiry justifying its continued existence. The attempt to introduce a simplified inquiry into the criminal process as a method of procedural economy was also not justified due to the problems of proof. The proposal to transfer the domestic model of preliminary investigation to the unspoken “police inquiry” with the full refusal of the preliminary investigation, as the defense and the injured were removed from the evidence in pre-trial proceedings was critisized. It was proposed to base a preliminary investigation on the combination of a non-procedural “police inquiry” with a preliminary investigation. At the same time, in cases of obvious crimes, with the consent of the participants in the case, it is possible to resolve the issue of transferring the case to court bypassing the investigation. In complex cases, upon the will of the victim or the defense, a preliminary investigation should be made based on the independence of an investigator.

About the authors

K. A. Savelev

Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

Е. A. Treshcheva

Department of Civil Procedure and Business Law, Samara National Research University

Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Lukovnikov G. D. Nachal'nik organa doznaniia: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i organizatsionno- upravlencheskie polnomochiia [Chief of the agency of inquiry: criminal procedural and organizational and managerial authorities]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i pravo [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law], 2013, vol. 1, pp. 122–126. Available at: http://ru.economics.vestnik. udsu.ru/archive/show/2-2013-1-22 [in Russian].
  2. Tatianin D. V. Polnomochiia nachal'nika organa doznaniia v svete polozhenii federal'nogo zakona № 440-FZ [Powers of a chief of an inquiry body in the light of provisions of the Federal Law no. 440-FZ]. Vestnik IuUrGU. Seriia «Pravo» [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series «Law», 2016, Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 36–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/law160405 [in Russian].
  3. Spirin A. V. Protsessual'naia deiatel'nost' organov doznaniia. Est' li neobkhodimost' v «prokurorskoi opeke»? [Inquiry bodies’ procedural activity. Is there a need of «prosecutor’s custodianship»?]. Vestnik Ural'skogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD RF [Bulletin of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation], 2016, Vol. 3, pp. 56–61 [in Russian].
  4. Manova N. S. Teoreticheskie problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nykh proizvodstv i differentsiatsii ikh form: dis. … d-ra iurid. nauk: 12.00.09 [Theoretical problems of criminal proceedings and differentiation of their forms: Doctoral of Law thesis: 12.00.09]. M.: Nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut problem ukrepleniia zakonnosti i pravoporiadka pri General'noi prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2005, 443 р. [in Russian].
  5. Vlasova N. A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniia form dosudebnogo proizvodstva v ugolovnom protsesse: dis. … d-ra iurid. nauk. 12.00.09 [Problems of improving the forms of pre-trial proceedings in the criminal process: Doctoral of Law thesis: 12.00.09]. M.: Vserossiiskii nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut MVD RF, 2001, pp. 187–405 [in Russian].
  6. Melnikov V. Yu. Uproshchennyi poriadok doznaniia. Ostalis' li voprosy? [Simplified procedure for inquiry. There were questions?]. Ustoichivoe razvitie nauki i obrazovaniia [Sustainable development of science and education], 2017, Vol. 1, p. 120–129. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27810186 [in Russian].
  7. Alexandrov A. S., Pozdnyakov M. L. Put' institutsional'noi reformy predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniia [The path of institutional reform of the preliminary investigation]. Iuridicheskaia nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2014, Vol. 1(25), pp. 78–82 [in Russian].
  8. Mironova A. V. O problemakh protsessual'nogo statusa organov vnutrennikh del kak organov doznaniia [About the problems of procedure status of organs of internal affairs as organs of inquiry]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2013, no. 2, pp. 19–21. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=18939465 [in Russian].
  9. Galiakhmetov M. P. Nachal'nik organa doznaniia kak uchastnik ugolovnogo protsessa [The chief of the inquiry body as a participant in the criminal process]. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve [Gaps in Russian Legislation], 2016, Vol. 4, pp. 217–219 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Savelev K.A., Treshcheva Е.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies