EXIT OF THE PARTICIPANT FROM OOO: FAMILY-LEGAL ASPECT
- Authors: Savelyeva N.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Civil and Business Law, Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 4, No 3 (2018)
- Pages: 77-82
- Section: Family and housing law
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/6412
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2018-4-3-77-82
- ID: 6412
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
As modern period is characterized by the increasing penetration of corporate norms into family relations, more and more issues arise in the resolution of corporate disputes to which the marriages are participants. At the same time, disputes may concern not only the division of the «common business», but also the implementation by the spouse-participant of the legal entity of its corporate rights. The article considers one of these rights – the right to withdraw from the OOO. The author of the article tries to determine the legal nature of the will of the participant to leave the OOO in order to answer the question of the necessity, validity, legality and expediency of applying the provisions of Article 35 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation. Agreeing with the business nature of the nature of the will of the participant of the OOO, the author justifies the need to distinguish between corporate transactions «complicated by marriage», depending on the legal purpose of their commission. The article concludes that the deal on leaving the company is not a transaction on the disposal of shares in the authorized capital of OOO, since the main legal goal of its commission is, first of all, the exercise of the personal non-property right of the spouse to withdraw from the company. Critical assessment of the existing notarial and judicial practice on demanding a notarized consent of the company partner’s spouse upon the certification of the spouse’s application for withdrawal from the OOO. Relevant proposals for changing legislation are proposed by the author in the work.
About the authors
N. M. Savelyeva
Department of Civil and Business Law, Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Bronnikova M. N., Savelejva N. M. Nekotorye osobennosti pravovogo polozheniia supruga kak uchastnika OOO [Some features of the legal status of a spouse as a member of the society Limited Liability]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2011, no. 3, pp. 47–53. Available at: http:// bukvoved.ru/anno/anno-03-2011.html#z9 [in Russian].
- Tikhonov V. V. Rasporiazhenie dolei OOO – sdelka, trebuiushchaia odobreniia supruga [Disposal of LLC shares – Deal Subject to a Spouse’s Approval]. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law], 2017, no. 1, pp. 42–44. Available at: http:// lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2017/grazhdanskoe-pravo/1 [in Russian].
- Zinkovsky M. A. Pravovaia priroda stat'i 26 Federal'nogo zakona «Ob obshchestvakh s ogranichennoi otvetstvennost'iu» [Legal nature of Article 26 of the Federal Law «On Limited Liability Companies»]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern Law], 2014, no. 3, pp. 53–55. Available at:
- https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=[in Russian].
- Kuznetsova O. A. Notarial'naia forma soglasiia supruga: nekotorye voprosy pravoprimenitel'noi praktiki [Notarial form of spousal consent: certain law enforcement issues]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern Law], 2017, no. 4, pp. 57–61. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29035938 [in Russian].
- Ilyushina M. N. Vykhod uchastnika iz obshchestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennost'iu: korporativnaia protsedura i odnostoronniaia sdelka [Exit of a participant from a limited liability company: a corporate procedure and a unilateral transaction]. Notarial'nyi vestnik [Notary Journal], 2016, no. 6, pp. 33–40 [in Russian].
- Levushkin A. N. Odnostoronnie voleiz"iavleniia suprugov v imushchestvennykh semeinykh pravootnosheniiakh: teoriia i praktika primeneniia [The Unilateral Will of the Spouses in a Property Family Relations: Theory and Practice]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2017, no. 12, pp. 17–22. Available at: http://www.bukvoved.ru/ anno/anno-12-2017.html#z4 [in Russian].
- Mandryukov A. V. Nekotorye osobennosti vykhoda uchastnika iz OOO [Some features of the participant's exit from LLC]. Aktual'nye voprosy bukhgalterskogo ucheta i nalogooblozheniia [Actual issues of accounting and taxation], 2016, no. 6. Available at: http://lexandbusiness.ru/view- article.php?id=7496 (accessed: 09.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Evstigneev E. A. Pravovaia priroda iuridicheski znachimykh soobshchenii [Legal nature of legally significant messages]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Review], 2012, no. 5, pp. 37–65. Available at: https://www. mvgp.org/kopiya-6-2012 [in Russian].
- Fomina O. N. Pravovaia priroda iuridicheski znachimykh soobshchenii i ikh rol' v korporativnom prave [Legal nature of legally significant messages and their role in corporate law]. Available at: http://отрасли-права.рф/ article/3400 (accessed: 09.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 18.04.2016 № 305-ES16-2571 po delu № A40-117162/2002 [Definition of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of April 18, 2016 № 305-ES16-2571 with regard to сase № A40-117162/2002]. Available at: http://legalacts.ru/sud/
- opredelenie-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-18042016-n-305-es16-2571-po-delu-n-a40-1171622012/ (accessed 08.2018) [in Russian].
- Opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 19 iiunia 2012 g. № 4g/2-3469/12 [Definition of the Moscow City Court as of June 19, 2012 № 4g/2-3469/12]. Available at legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
- Opredelenie Primorskogo kraevogo suda ot 9 iiulia 2014 g. po delu № 33-5797 [Definition of the Primorsky Regional Court as of July 9, 2014 with regard to case № 33- 5797]. Available at legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 02.09.2016 g. po delu № A40-171247/15 [Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District as of 02.09.2016 with regard to case № A40-171247/15]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov [Bank of arbitration awards]. Available at: http://ras.arbitr.ru (accessed 10.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Deviatogo arbitrazhnogo apelliatsionnogo suda ot 03.05.2018 № 09AP-14497/2018 po delu № A40-155976/17 [Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court as of 03.05.2018 № 09AP 14497/2018 with regard to case № A40-155976/17]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov [Bank of arbitration awards]. Available at: http://ras.arbitr.ru (accessed 10.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apelliatsionnogo suda ot 26.02.2018 g. po delu № A43-20380/2017 [Decision of the First Arbitration Appeal Court of 26.02.2018 on the case no. А43-20380/2017]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov [Bank of arbitration awards]. Available at: http://ras. arbitr.ru (accessed 10.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 21.01.2014 № 9913/13 [Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation as of January 21, 2014 № 9913/13]. Available at: http://www.arbitr.ru/bras.net/f.aspx?id_ casedoc=1_1_6fbbd2de-71f1-4028-aa0c-7033af1cbbe7 (accessed 10.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Povarov Y. S. Zaiavlenie uchastnika o vykhode iz obshchestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennost'iu: voprosy notarial'nogo udostovereniia [The participant statement about with-drawal from limited liability company: questions of notarization]. Vlast' Zakona [The Reign of Law], 2015, no. 4, pp. 96–102.Available at: http://niiapsp.ru/upload/24.pdf [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Desiatogo arbitrazhnogo apelliatsionnogo suda ot 22 noiabria 2011 g. po delu № A41-11823/11 [Decision of the Tenth Arbitration Appeal Court as of November 22, 2011 with regard to case № A41- 11823/11]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov [Bank of arbitration awards]. Available at: http://ras.arbitr.ru (accessed 10.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 11.09.2012 № VAS-4107/12 po delu № A41- 11823/11 [Decision of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation as of 11.09.2012 № VAS-4107/12 with regard to case № A41-11823/11]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov [Bank of arbitration awards].
- Available at: http://ras.arbitr.ru (accessed 08.2018) [in Russian].
- Kharitonova O. O. Sootnoshenie norm grazhdanskogo i semeinogo prava v chasti priznaniia nedeistvitel'nymi sdelok, trebuiushchikh notarial'nogo soglasiia supruga [Correlation of the norms of civil and family law regarding the invalidation of transactions requiring a notarial consent of the spouse]. In: Sovremennoe semeinoe pravo Rossii i tendentsii ego razvitiia: teoriia i praktika: sbornik tezisov po itogam
- Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi videokonferentsii, maia 2018 g. Otv. red. I.V. Bakaeva, V.E. Streglo [Modern Family Law of Russia and its Development Trends: Theory and Practice: collection of abstracts following the results of the All-Russian research and practical videoconference, May 22, 2018. I.V. Bakaeva, V. E. Streglo (Eds.). Rostov-on-Don; Taganrog: izdatel'stvo Iuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta, 2018, pp. 13–17 [in Russian].
- Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26.04.2018 №305-ES 17-20998 po delu № A40-167485/2015 [Definition of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of 26.04.2018 № 305-ES 17-20998 with regard to case № A40-167485/2015]. Available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/stor_
- pdf_ec.php?id=(accessed 09.08.2018) [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Federal'nogo Arbitrazhnogo Suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 02.08.2016 po delu № A40-167485/2015 [Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District as of 02.08.2016 with regard to case № A40-167485/2015]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov
- [Bank of arbitration awards]. Available at: http://ras.arbitr.ru
- (accessed 08.2018) [in Russian].
- Chashkova S. Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva v notarial'noi praktike: sbornik statei [Actual issues of civil law in notarial practice: collection of articles]. M.: Fond razvitiia pravovoi kul'tury, 2017, 80 p. [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 22.02.2018 g. № F09-206/18 po delu № A76-1935/2017 [Decree of the Arbitration Court of the Urals District as of 22.02.2018 № F09-206/18 with regard to case № A76- 1935/2017]. Bank reshenii arbitrazhnykh sudov [Bank of arbitration awards]. Available at: http://ras.arbitr.ru (accessed 10.08.2018) [in Russian].