PROBLEMS OF CARRYING OUT EXTRADITION VERIFICATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
- Authors: Markova T.Y.1, Yurkevich M.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Criminal Procedural Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
- master, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
- Issue: Vol 3, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 144-148
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/6059
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2017-3-4-144-148
- ID: 6059
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article examines the problems that arise in the course of an extradition audit, which is an
integral part of the procedure for extraditing persons for the purpose of prosecuting or executing
a sentence. The authors consider cases of violation of the individual’s rights to freedom and personal inviolability, the principle of legality in the proceedings, as well as the principle of legal
certainty. The article criticizes drafts of normative acts designed to improve the procedure for
issuing, proposals are made to change them. The article points out the inadmissibility of unlimited time for conducting an extradition audit, the duty of the prosecutor’s office to be guided when determining the content of the charge by official acts that formulate the charge against a person in accordance with the law. It also points out on the need for a legislative definition of such grounds for denial of extradition, as the person’s refugee status, taking into account the meaning of the Convention on the Status of Refugees. It is stated that it is necessary to pass a judgment in all cases of imprisonment at the time of the extradition. The relevance of the chosen topic is due to the presence of legislative gaps in the regulation of the extradition institution and the need for their immediate elimination.
About the authors
T. Yu. Markova
Department of Criminal Procedural Law, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
M. A. Yurkevich
master, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Aleksandrovich T. Vydacha prestupnikov i ee znachenie v bor’be s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom: Dis.... kand. iurid. nauk [Extradition of criminals and its importance in the fi ght against international terrorism: Candidate’s of Laws thesis]. M., 1986, p. 22 [in Russian].
- Malov A.A. Sotrudnichestvo General’noi prokuratury RF s kompetentnymi organami zarubezhnykh gosudarstv v voprosakh
- ekstraditsii [Cooperation of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian
- Federation with competent authorities of foreign countries in matters of
- extradition]. Zakonnost’ [Legitimacy], 2012, no. 12, p. [in Russian].
- Yashin N. «Vydat’ liuboi tsenoi» [«Turn over at any price»]. Retrieved from: http://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/vydat-lyuboytsenoy/
- (accessed 11.2017) [in Russian].
- Yartsev R.V. Sovershenstvovanie ugolovno-protsessual’nogo
- zakonodatel’stva v sfere primeneniia mer presecheniia: realii i tendentsii [Perfection of the criminal procedure legislation in the sphere of application of preventive measures: realities and tendencies]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of the Orenburg State University], 2011, no. 3, pp. 170–[in Russian].
- Barenboim P.D. Ekstraditsiia bez zashchity [Extradition without protection]. Pravo i ekonomika [Law and Economics], 2013, no. 7, pp.
- –[in Russian].
- Konventsiia o statuse bezhentsev 1951 goda (Rossiia prisoedinilas’
- k Konventsii Postanovleniem Verkhovnogo Soveta RF ot 11.1992 g. № 3876-1). [Convention on the Status of Refugees of 1951 (Russia acceded to the Convention by the Resolution of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation dated 13.11.1992 № 3876-1)] [in Russian].
- Malysheva O.A. O probleme zakonodatel’noi reglamentatsii ekstraditsionnoi proverki [On the problem of legislative regulation of extradition verifi cation]. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaia iustitsiia [International Criminal Law and International Justice], 2016, no. 4, pp. 12-14 [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie ESPCh po delu IaKOVENKO PROTIV ROSSII (YAKOVENKO v. RUSSIA), zhaloba № 48528/09 ot 27 iiulia 2017 goda [Decision of the ECHR with regard to case YAKOVENKO v. RUSSIA, complaint № 48528/09 dated July 27, 2017] [in Russian].
- Zakonoproekt № 67509-7 «O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovnoprotsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (v chasti sovershenstvovaniia protsedury vydachi lits po zaprosu inostrannogo gosudarstva dlia ugolovnogo presledovaniia ili ispolneniia prigovora)», vnesen v Gosudarstvennuiu Dumu FS RF 29 dekabria 2016 g. [Bill № 67509-7 «On Amendments Being Made to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (regarding the improvement of the procedure for the extradition of persons upon the request of a foreign state for criminal prosecution or execution of a sentence)», submitted to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly December 29, 2016 [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 07.06.2007 po delu «Garabaev (Garabayev) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 38411/02) [Decision of the ECHR dated 07.06.2007 with regard to case «Garabayev against the Russian Federation» (complaint № 38411/02)] [in Russian].
- Postanovleniia ESPCh ot 3 aprelia 2014 g. po delu «Oshlakov protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii», zhaloba № 56662/09 [Decisions of the ECHR dated April 3, 2014 with regard to case «Oshlakov v. Russian Federation», complaint № 56662/09] [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 17 aprelia 2014 g. po delu «Gairatbek Saliev protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii», zhaloba № 39093/13 [ECHR Resolution dated April 17, 2014 with regard to case «Gayratbek Saliev v. Russian Federation», complaint № 39093/13] [in Russian].
- Prilozhenie № 5 k Dokladu o rezul’tatakh monitoringa pravoprimeneniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2014 god [Appendix № 5 to the Report on the results of monitoring of law enforcement in the Russian Federation for 2014]. Retrieved from: http://www.pravo.gov. ru/export/sites/defauU/other_documents/doklad_po_MP_2014.pdf
- (accessed: 11.2017).
Supplementary files
