PROBLEMS OF DELIMITATION OF JURISDICTION OF CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE CASES CONSIDERED BY COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the article critical view on the reform of procedural legislation

is presented. The issue about the criteria on the basis of which the

plaintiffs and the court solve the question about the procedural order

of adjustment is viewed; the conclusion about the absence of

appropriate criteria is made. The consequences of misqualification of

procedural order are viewed: rejecting of acceptance of legal claim or the

termination of proceedings in case resulting in the unconditional

refusing in the defense of right. The newest judicial practice that gave

rise to the tendency of successive breakdowns of courts in hearing of

cases as well as in the process of Administrative Procedure Code of

the Russian Federation and Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian

Federation is analyzed. The addition of norms about the refusal in

accepting (administrative) bill of complaint and on termination of

proceedings in case of proactive position of court is suggested.

 

About the authors

I. M. Beltukova

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru

References

  1. Bonner A.T. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: mif ili real’nost’ ili spor protsessualista s administrativistom [Administrative legislation in the Russian Federation:
  2. myth or reality or the argument between processualist and administrativist]. Zakon [Law], 2016, no. 6, pp. 24–[in Russian].
  3. Kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi).
  4. Pod red. V.F. Iakovleva, M.K. Iukova [Commentary to the Arbitration Procedural Code of the
  5. Russian Federation (article-by-article). V.F. Yakovlev, M.K. Yukov (Eds.)]. M.: Gorodets, 2003, pp. 512–[in Russian].
  6. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi). Pod red. V.M. Zhuikova, V.K. Puchinskogo,
  7. M.K. Treushnikova [Scientific practical commentary on the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (article-by-article). V.M. Zhuykov, V.K. Puchinsky, M.K. Treushnikov (Eds.)]. M.: Gorodets, 2003, pp. 514–[in Russian].
  8. Novikov A.V. Administrativno-protsessual’naia forma: nauchnye i pravovye realii [Administrative and procedural form: scientific and legal realias]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess [Administrative Law and Procedure], 2015, no. 11 [in Russian].
  9. Il’in A.V. K voprosu ob obosnovanii pereraspredeleniia bremeni dokazyvaniia [On the issue about justification of reversal of the burden of proof]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure], 2011, no. 3, pp. 27–30 [in Russian].
  10. Mikhailova E.V. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo kak protsessual’naia forma zashchity narushennykh publichnykh prav [Administrative legal proceedings as a procedural form of protection of violated public rights]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [Arbitrazh and Civil
  11. Procedure], 2016, no. 4, p. [in Russian].
  12. Nemtzeva V.B. Nekotorye problemy sootnosheniia grazhdanskogo i administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v sudakh obshchei iurisdiktsii [Some problems of correlation of civil and administrative legal proceedings in the courts of general jurisdiction]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of Civil Procedure], 2016, no. 1, pp. 190–208 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Beltukova I.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies