PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF AMNESTY TO CONDITIONALLY CONDEMNED
- Authors: Starodumov S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Udmurt State University
- Issue: Vol 2, No 4 (2016)
- Pages: 113-118
- Section: Tribune of young scientist
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/5066
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2016-2-4-113-118
- ID: 5066
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In article brought up questions of application of amnesty to the
persons having conditional condemnation. Application of the act of
amnesty has to be monotonous that to some extent will allow to observe
not only an order of realization of the rights of the victim, but also to
observe the rights of the citizens who appeared from the opposite side of
the law. The contradictions revealed in article will allow to pay attention
to respect for the rights and legitimate interests of citizens to whom
application of acts of amnesty is possible that in turn will strengthen
belief of citizens in lawful and fair trial. In this work the order of
application of acts of amnesty is mentioned by consideration of criminal
cases in essence. However every time in court practice there are problems
at their application and interpretation. In this work there is a wish to
raise the question of problems of application of the act of amnesty on the
example of the Resolution of 24.04.2015 № 6576-6 «About the
announcement of amnesty in connection with the 70 anniversary of the
Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945».
About the authors
S. V. Starodumov
Udmurt State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru
References
- Skoblikov P.A. Sovremennye rossiiskie amnistii: osnovaniia i posledstviia [Modern Russian amnesties: foundations and consequences]. Zakon [Law], 2014, no. 8, pp. 106–113 [in Russian].
- Tikhomirov M.Yu. Iuridicheskaia entsiklopediia. Pod red. M.Iu. Tikhomirova [Legal encyclopedia. M.Yu. Tikhomirov (Ed.)]. М., 1998, p. 30 [in Russian].
- Skoblikov P.A. Otkaz v dostupe k pravosudiiu postradavshim ot prestuplenii: problemy i resheniia [Access denial to the legislation to those who suffered from crimes: problems and solutions]. Zakonodatel’stvo [Legislation], 2012, no. 8, pp. 72–78 [in Russian].
- Dolgikh T.N. Poriadok rassmotreniia voprosa ob ispolnenii prigovora pri nalichii drugogo neispolnennogo prigovora [Order of consideration of the issue about the execution of a sentence in the presence of another unexecuted sentence]. Advokat [Advocate], 2016, no. 9, pp. 21–27 [in Russian].
- Konin V.V., Bezrukikh E.S. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy po obespecheniiu uchastiia v sudebnom zasedanii v stadii ispolneniia prigovora osuzhdennogo i poterpevshego [Some problematic issues to ensure participation in the hearing on the stage of execution of the sentence of the
- convicted person and the victim]. Sudebnaia vlast’ i ugolovnyi protsess [The Judiciary and the Penal Process], 2016, no. 1, pp. 138–[in Russian].
- Kozubenko Yu.V. Prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela sudom apelliatsionnoi instantsii [Termination of criminal case by the Court of Appeal]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal [Russian
- Juridical Journal], 2016, no. 3, pp. 215–[in Russian].
- Volkov K.A. K voprosu ob amnistii v sviazi s 70-letiem Pobedy v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine 1941-1945 godov [On the question of an amnesty in connection with the 70th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945]. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia [Russian Justitia],
- , no. 7, pp. 58–[in Russian].
Supplementary files
