PROPORTIONALITY OF PROCEDURAL RESTRICTIONS TO THE THREATENED PUNISHMENT AND ECONOMY OF COERCION WHEN CHOOSING A MEASURE OF RESTRAINT
- Authors: Muravev K.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation named after V. V. Lukyanov
- Issue: Vol 6, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 72-79
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/8357
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-4-72-79
- ID: 8357
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article draws attention to the fact that the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation provides for uniform grounds for applying preventive measures, and the circumstances taken into account do not contain clear selection criteria. This implies the discretion of the competent persons when making a procedural decision, and, ultimately, allows you to raise the question of «fairness of preventive measures». The author points out that the choice of a fair measure of restraint is preceded by the identification of the limits of coercion that meet the requirement of «proportionality of procedural restrictions to the threatened punishment». The material and legal conditions for applying certain preventive measures are analyzed. It is concluded that the decision on the measure of influence should be made taking into account the requirement of «economy of compulsion», which should not be absolutized.
About the authors
K. V. Muravev
Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation named after V. V. Lukyanov
Author for correspondence.
Email: murki@list.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 6 dekabria 2011 g. № 27-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti stat'i 107 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sviazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina Estonskoi Respubliki A. T. Fedina» [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated December 6, 2011 № 27-P «In the case of checking the constitutionality of Article 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of a citizen of the Republic of Estonia A. T. Fedin»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_123019 [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16 iiulia 2015 g. № 23-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chasti tret'ei – sed'moi stat'i 109 i chasti tret'ei stat'i 237 UPK RF v sviazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina S. V. Makhina» [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated July 16, 2015 №. 23-P «In the case of checking the constitutionality of provisions of part three – seven of Article 109 and part three of Article 237 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen S. V. Makhin»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://bazanpa.ru/konstitutsionnyi-sud-rf-postanovlenie-n23-p-ot16072015-h2556633 [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 19 dekabria 2013 g. № 41 «O praktike primeneniia sudami zakonodatel'stva o merakh presecheniia v vide zakliucheniia pod strazhu, domashnego aresta, zaloga i zapreta opredelennykh deistvii» [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated December 19, 2013 № 41 «About the practice of application by the courts of the legislation on measures of restraint in the form of detention, house arrest, bail and prohibition of certain actions»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_156184 [in Russian].
- Golovinskaya I. V. Institut mer presecheniia: problemy diversifikatsii i varianty ikh razresheniia [Institute of preventive measures: problems of diversification and options for their resolution]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern Law], 2016, no. 3, pp. 90–96. Available at: https://s.sovremennoepravo.ru/283722 [in Russian].
- Doklad o deiatel'nosti Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2016 g. [Report on the activities of the Human Rights Commissioner for the Russian Federation for 2016]. Rossiiskaia gazeta [Russian newspaper], 2017, May 17. Available at: https://rg.ru/2017/05/17/doklad-dok.html [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 22 marta 2018 g. № 12-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chastei pervoi i tret'ei stat'i 107 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sviazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina S. A. Kostromina» [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated March 22, 2018 № 12-P «In the case of checking the constitutionality of parts one and three of Article 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen S. A. Kostromin»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://legalacts.ru/sud/postanovlenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-22032018-n-12-p [in Russian].
- Federal'nyi zakon ot 18 aprelia 2018 g. № 72-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii v chasti izbraniia i primeneniia mer presecheniia v vide zapreta opredelennykh deistvii, zaloga i domashnego aresta» [Federal Law № 72-FZ dated April 18, 2018 «Оn amendments being made to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation regarding the election and application of preventive measures in the form of prohibition of certain actions, bail and house arrest»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_296073 [in Russian].
- Grichanichenko A. Zapret opredelennykh deistvii i domashnii arest [Prohibition of certain actions and house arrest]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2019, no. 6, pp. 97–103. Available at: https://e.ugpr.ru/778687 [in Russian].
- Beccaria Ch. O prestupleniiakh i nakazaniiakh. Sost. i predisl. V. S. Ovchinskogo [About crimes and punishments. Complier and preface by V. S. Ovchinsky]. Moscow, 2004, 184 p. Available at: http://elib.shpl.ru/ru/nodes/57757-bekkaria-ch-o-prestupleniyah-i-nakazaniyah-spb-1806#mode/inspect/page/1/zoom/4 [in Russian].
- Grinenko A. V., Ivanov D. A. Sovershenstvovanie mer protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniia v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Improvement of measures of procedural coercion in Russian criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2019, no. 2 (46), pp. 91–96. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24411/2078-5356-2019-10215 [in Russian].
- Lazareva V. A., Vershinina S. I. Protsessual'nyi status uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva kak faktor, obuslavlivaiushchii soderzhanie i sostav sistemy mer presecheniia [The procedural status of the participants in criminal proceedings as a factor determining the content and composition of the preventive measures system]. Vektor nauki TGU. Seriia: Iuridicheskie nauki [Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Legal Sciences], 2020, no. 1 (40), pp. 17–25. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42652651 [in Russian].
- Minimal'nye standartnye pravila Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii v otnoshenii mer, ne sviazannykh s tiuremnym zakliucheniem (Tokiiskie pravila). Priniaty rezoliutsiei 45/110 General'noi assamblei ot 14 dekabria 1990 g. [Standard minimum rules of the United Nations in respect of measures not connected with imprisonment (Tokyo rules). Adopted by the General Assembly resolution 45/110 dated December 14, 1990]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/tokyo_rules.shtml [in Russian].
- Tsokolova O. I. Mery ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniia, sostoiashchie v izoliatsii podozrevaemogo, obviniaemogo [Measures of criminal procedural compulsion consisting in isolation of the suspect, the accused]. Moscow, 2008, 310 p. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19787725 [in Russian].
- Tsokolova O. I. Est' li spravedlivost' na dosudebnykh stadiiakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva? [Is there any justice in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings?]. In: Sovremennye problemy zakonnosti i spravedlivosti v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posviashchennoi 80-letiiu zasluzhennogo iurista Rossiiskoi Federatsii, d-ra iurid. nauk, prof. Anatoliia Petrovicha Guliaeva [Modern problems of legality and justice in the criminal process of the Russian Federation: International research and practical conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the honored lawyer of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Laws, professor Anatoly Petrovich Gulyaev]. Moscow, 2014, pp. 101–106 [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 22 marta 2005 g. № 4-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti riada polozhenii UPK RF, reglamentiruiushchikh poriadok i sroki primeneniia v kachestve mery presecheniia zakliucheniia pod strazhu na stadiiakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, sleduiushchikh za okonchaniem predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniia i napravleniem ugolovnogo dela v sud, v sviazi s zhalobami riada grazhdan» [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated March 22, 2005 № 4-P «In the case of checking the constitutionality of several provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, regulating the order and terms of application as a preventive measure of detention on stages of criminal proceedings following the completion of the preliminary investigation and forward the case to the court in connection with complaints of some citizens»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://legalacts.ru/doc/postanovlenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-22032005-n [in Russian].
- Mikhailov V. A. Mery presecheniia v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Measures of restraint in the Russian criminal process]. Moscow, 1996, 304 p. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27227436 [in Russian].
- Guselnikova E. V. Zakliuchenie pod strazhu v sisteme mer presecheniia: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Detention in the system of preventive measures: author's abstract of Candidate's of Legal Sciences thesis]. Tomsk, 2001, 24 p. Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_000313769 [in Russian].
- Muravev K. V. Mery protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniia – osobye sredstva ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeistviia: doktrina, primenenie, optimizatsiia: monografi ia [Measures of procedural coercion are special means of criminal influence: doctrine, application, optimization: monograph]. Omsk, 2017, 219 p. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29961293 [in Russian].
- Postanovl enie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16 iiulia 2015 g. № 23-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chasti tret'ei – sed'moi stat'i 109 i chasti tret'ei stat'i 237 UPK RF v sviazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina S. V. Makhina» [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated July 16, 2015 №. 23-P «In the case of checking the constitutionality of provisions of part three – seven of Article 109 and part three of Article 237 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen S. V. Makhin»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://bazanpa.ru/konstitutsionnyi-sud-rf-postanovlenie-n23-p-ot16072015-h2556633 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
