ABOUT UNDERSTANDING OF THE OFFICIAL DOCUMENT ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLES 292 AND 327 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF QUALIFYING CRIMES

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article identifies and reveals the Corpus delicti of forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code) and the manufacture of counterfeit documents (Article 327 of the Criminal Code). The article concludes that there is a differentiated understanding of the official document for the composition of crimes from different chapters of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The article concludes that there is a differentiated understanding of the official document for the crimes from different chapters of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The legal content of the subject of the crime is determined by the specifics of protected public relations that are damaged, as well as other signs of the crime. It is necessary to update the understanding of forged documents in connection with the introduction of official electronic documents and private documents. It is concluded that for the purposes of proper qualification of crimes, the signs of the subject of official forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code) and the production of forged documents (Article 327 of the Criminal Code) should be fixed in the notes to the relevant articles of the Criminal Code, taking into account the specifics of the specific object of crimes.

About the authors

V. I. Balandin

Department of Information and Public Relations of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Samara Region

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Khilyuta V. V. Predmet prestupleniya v nauke ugolovnogo prava: problemy i protivorechiya [The Subject of Crime in Criminal Law: Problems and Contradictions]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2016, no. 7, pp. 70–79. doi: 10.12737/20150 [in Russian].
  2. Inogamova-Hegay L. V., Kibalnik A. G., Klenova T. V., Korobeev A. I., Lopashenko N. A. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava. Chast' Obshchaya. Uchebnik dlya magistrov [Actual problems of criminal law. General Part. Textbook for Magisters]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2015, 233 p. Available at: https://cyberpedia.su/17xf2c.html [in Russian].
  3. Brilliantov A. V. O soderzhanii ponyatiya «ofitsial'nyy dokument» [On the content of the concept of «official document»]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2003, no. 2, pp. 65–69. Available at:
  4. https://jrpnorma.ru/articles/article-pdf?1592123182 [in Russian].
  5. Rg.ru. Available at: https://rg.ru/2013/05/14/infasite.html [in Russian].
  6. Styazhkina S. A. Ofitsial'nyy dokument kak predmet sluzhebnogo podloga: ponyatie, priznaki, vidy [Official document as an object of forgery: the concept, features, types]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo» [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law], 2014, no. 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ofitsialnyy-dokument-kak-predmet-sluzhebnogo-podloga-ponyatie-priznaki-vidy (accessed 13.11.2019).
  7. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19 maya 2009 g. №575-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Morozovskogo Vladimira Evgen'evicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav ch. 1 st. 327 UK RF» [Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated May 19, 2009 № 575-O-O «On refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of citizen
  8. Morozovsky Vladimir Evgenievich on violation of his constitutional rights by part of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_90336 [in Russian].
  9. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 dekabrya 2010 g. N 1671-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Shishkina Vitaliya Yur'evicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav chast'yu pervoy stat'i 327 Ugolovnogo kodeksa
  10. Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated December 16, № 1671-O-O «On refusal to accept for consideration of the complaint of the citizen Shishkin Vitaly Yuryevich on violation of his constitutional rights by part one of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/1699142 [in Russian].
  11. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 oktyabrya 2009 g. №1236-00 «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanki Migutinoy Yulii Sergeevny na narushenie ee konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami st. 292 UK RF» [Determination of
  12. the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation № 1236-dated October 13, 2009 «On refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of the citizen Migutina Yulia Sergeevna on violation of her constitutional rights by the provisions of Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/1693023.
  13. Bukalerova L. A. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana ofitsial'nogo informatsionnogo oborota. Pod red. V. S. Komissarova, N. I. Pikurova [Criminal and legal protection of official information turnover. Komissarov V. S., Pikurov N.I. (Eds.)]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2006, 360 p. [in Russian].
  14. Semenov R. B. Ugolovno-pravovaya otsenka podloga dokumentov: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal and legal assessment of forgery of documents: Candidate's of Legal Sciences thesis]. Moscow, 2005, 186 p. Available at: http://www.dslib.net/kriminal-pravo/ugolovno-pravovaja-ocenka-podloga-dokumentov.html [in Russian].
  15. Dineka V. I. Otvetstvennost' za dolzhnostnye prestupleniya po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii (ugolovnopravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekt): dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk [Responsibility for offi cial crimes under the criminal law of Russia (criminal law and criminological aspect): Doctoral of Laws thesis]. Moscow, 2000. 345 pp. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/otvetstvennost-za-dolzhnostnye-prestupleniya-po-ugolovnomu-pravu-rossii-ugolovno-pravovoi-i- [in Russian].
  16. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti: uchebnik. Pod obshch. red. Zhuravleva M. P., Nikulina S. I., 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Criminal law. General and Special parts: textbook. Zhuravlyova M. P., Nikulina S. I. (Eds.), 3rd edition, revised and enlarged]. Moscow: Yur.
  17. Norma, 2014, p. Available at: https://rucont.ru/file.ashx?guid=856993ec-78ff-4829-9f9b-82af3e3aa754 [in Russian].
  18. Brilliantov A. V. Kriterii ofitsial'nogo dokumenta [Criteria of the official document]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2010, no. 5. Available at: http://centerbereg.ru/h918.html (accessed 13.11.2019) [in Russian].
  19. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24 sentyabrya 2008 g. № 213-П08 [Determination of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated September 24, 2008 N 213-П08]. Retrieved from legal reference system "Consultant Plus". Available at:
  20. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=78272#[in Russian].
  21. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 noyabrya 2005 g. N 70-o05-20 [Determination of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated November 25, 2005 № 70-o05-20]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
  22. Polenov G. F. Otvetstvennost' za pokhishchenie, poddelku dokumentov i ikh ispol'zovanie [Responsibility for stealing, forgery of documents and their use]. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1980, 72 p. [in Russian].
  23. Opredelenie sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 08.10.2007 goda № 47-O07-51 [Definition of the judicial division on criminal cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 08.10.2007 № 47-O07-51]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/68041698/79322084 [in Russian].
  24. Opredelenie sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30.06.2014 goda № 44-APU14-33 [Definition of the judicial division on criminal cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 30.06.2014 № 44-APU14-33]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
  25. Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court], 2003, no. 5. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://www.vsrf.ru/documents/newsletters/1629 [in Russian].
  26. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy): v 2 t. T. 2. A. V. Brilliantov, G. D. Dolzhenkova, E. N. Zhevlakov, red.: A. V. Brilliantov, Ros. akad. pravosudiya. 2-e izd. [Brilliantov A. V., Dolzhenkova G. D., Zhevlakov E. N. Comment on the
  27. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (article-by-article): in vols. Vol. 2. Brilliantov A. V. (Ed.). Russian Academy of Justice. 2nd edition]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2015, 701 p. Available at: https://www.lawmix.ru/commlaw/211 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2020 Balandin V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies