FEATURES OF THE NATURE OF THE ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE IN THE RUSSIAN JUSTICE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article discusses various approaches to the disclosure of the content of the concept of competition. It is concluded that the traditional Russian and, above all, Soviet understanding of the principle of competition differs from the classical Roman principle of competition. The principle of competition, enshrined in the criminal procedure law of Russia, includes, in addition to the traditional element-the parties having the right to be heard, also an active court, which must ensure equal conditions for the parties in the course of justice, must «comprehend the truth» and at the same time remain an independent and neutral arbitrator. Such an approach is acceptable, it fits into the legal consciousness of the law enforcement officer, but under one condition, if the implementation of such a model of justice, the goal of the criminal process is achieved-respect for human rights and freedoms. However, the constantly changing criminal procedure legislation indicates that the current system does not allow to fully implement in practice the ideas that are enshrined in the law. This means that the principle of competition, its content can still be and perhaps should be revised, focusing not only on the traditions of our legal system, but also on European traditions.

About the authors

Е. V. Marina

Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Belonosov V. O. Pravovye problemy ugolovno-protsessual’nogo zakonotvorchestva na sovremennom etape [Legal problems of criminal procedure legislation at the modern stage]. In: Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti: sb. statei. Nauch. red. O. I. Andreeva, T. V. Trubnikova; otv. sekretar’ I. V. Chadnova [Legal issues of strengthening Russian statehood: collection of articles. Andreeva O. I., Trubnikova T. V. (Eds.); executive editor Chadnova I. V.]. Tomsk: Izdat. dom Tomskogo gosuniversiteta, 2018, Issue 79, pp. 27–34 [in Russian].
  2. Belkin A. R. Eshche odna reforma UPK ili vozvrat na krugi svoya [One more reform of the Criminal Procedure Code, or coming back?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2014, no. 5, pp. 99–103. Available at: http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/ pdf/pravo/2014/01/2014-01-13.pdf [in Russian].
  3. Pobedkin A. V. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi zakon Rossii: na puti k otechestvennym nravstvennym tsennostyam [The Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure: on the way to domestic moral values]. Sudebnaya vlast’ i ugolovnyi protsess [Judicial authority and criminal process], 2017, no. 4, pp. 62–70. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ugolovno-protsessualnyy-zakon-rossii-na-puti-k-otechestvennym-nravstvennym-tsennostyam/viewer [in Russian].
  4. Sokolskaya L. V. Etapy pravovoi akkul’turatsii v Rossii [Stages of Law Acculturation in Russia]. Lex Russica, 2009, no. 2, pp. 396–409. Available at: https:// elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12517634 [in Russian].
  5. Rimskoe pravo. Izd. 2-e [Roman law. 2nd edition]. M.: TON-Ostozh’e, 2000, 208 p. Avaialble at: http:// www.telecomlaw.ru/studyguides/Om_rom_law.pdf [in Russian].
  6. Makarova Z. V. Sostyazatel’nost’ kak sredstvo ustanovleniya istiny po ugolovnomu delu [The adversary system as a means of establishing the truth in a criminal case]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the South Ural State University], 2015, Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 61–65. Available at: https:// elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23568302 [in Russian].
  7. Strogovich M. S. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal process]. M.: Yurid. izd-vo NKYu SSSR, 1941, 312 p. [in Russian].
  8. Strogovich M. S. O sostyazatel’nosti i protsessual’nykh funktsiyakh v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [On adversarial and procedural functions in the Soviet criminal proceedings]. Pravovedenie, 1962, no. 2, pp. 106–114. Available at: http://www.law.edu.ru/ article/article.asp?articleID=1129417 [in Russian].
  9. Konin V. V. Nekotorye voprosy sostyazatel’nosti i ravnopraviya v ugolovnom protsesse [Some issues of competition and equality in criminal proceedings]. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve [Gaps in Russian legislation], 2008, no. 1, pp. 354–355. Available at: https:// elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11734001 [in Russian].
  10. Cheltsov M. A. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal process]. M.: Yurid. izd-vo MYu SSSR, 1948, 624 p. Available at: http://kalinovsky-k.narod.ru/b/cheltsov [in Russian].
  11. Polyakov M. P. Neskol’ko myslei ob ideologicheskoi sushchnosti printsipov ugolovnogo protsessa [A few thoughts on the ideological nature of criminal procedure principles]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2016, no. 3 (35), pp. 84–88. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=26687557 [in Russian].
  12. Trefilov A. A. Sistema printsipov v ugolovnom protsesse Shveitsarii [System of Principles in Swiss Criminal Process]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2018, no. 2, pp. 170–192. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35146614 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Marina Е.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies