CONCILIATING AGREEMENT AS A NEW BASIS FOR EXEMPTION FROM CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CLOSURE OF CRIMINAL CASES OF MINORS
- Authors: Shestakova L.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 5, No 4 (2019)
- Pages: 122-126
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/7597
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2019-5-4-122-126
- ID: 7597
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The author of the article came to the conclusion that there are two competing models of criminal procedure policy: the model of «due process» and the model of «crime control». Restorative justice was supported in the second half of the 20th century. The restorative approach to justice was a natural result of the trends in the criminal process – humanization, private and public interest, acceleration and simplification of criminal proceedings. The author sees the consistent consolidation of the basic ideas of restorative justice in international acts. The introduction of restorative technologies in the criminal proceedings of many foreign countries began with changes in juvenile justice. The author of the article formulates proposals for restoring the institution of exemption from criminal liability of minors and for applying mediation in terminating a criminal case in connection with the reconciliation of the parties (Article 25 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation).
About the authors
L. A. Shestakova
Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa. Pod red. prof. L. V. Golovko. 2-e izd.,ispr. [Course of criminal procedure. L. V. Golovko (Ed.). 2nd edition, revised]. M.: Statut, 2017, 1280 p. Available at: https://znanium.com/ bookread2.php?book=1014829 [in Russian].
- Marilyn D. M., Williams III. F. P. (ed.) Encyclopedia of juvenile justice. US: Sage publ., cop., 2003, 174 p. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.4135/9781412950640 [in English].
- Kobleva M. M. Vosstanovitel’noe pravosudie i mediatsiya v sudoproizvodstve sud’i [Restorative justice and mediation in judicial proceedings of the judge]. Prepared for the system «Consultant Plus», 2016 (accessed 28.06.2019) [in Russian].
- Zhestovskaya D. A., Tuzov A. G. Ot zashchity publichnogo interesa k zashchite interesa poterpevshego [From protecting public interest to protecting the victim’s interest]. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya [Russian Journal of Criminal Law], 2018, no. 11, pp. 46–49. doi: 10.17223/23088451/11/9 [in Russian].
- Lazareva V. A. Dosledstvennaya proverka [Pre-Investigation Check]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal Judicial Proceeding], 2016, no. 4, pp. 107–115. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27337559 [in Russian].
- Khromova N. M. Realizatsiya kontseptsii vosstanovitel’nogo pravosudiya po delam v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh [Implementation of the concept of restorative justice in juvenile cases]. Advokat, 2017, no. 3, pp. 57–64. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=30113795 [in Russian].
- Bryleva E. A. Ot nakazaniya k primireniyu: nastuplenie na industriyu bor’by s prestupnost’yu [From Punishment to Conciliation: Attack at the Crime Combating Industry]. Mirovoi sud’ya [Magistrate judge], 2018, no. 1, pp. 13–17. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=32306098 [in Russian].
- Kabelkov S. N. Perspektivy primeneniya mediatsii v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve s uchetom mezhdunarodnogo opyta [Prospects of applying mediation in the Russian criminal proceeding based on international experience]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel’naya praktika [Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice], 2014, no. 4 (30), pp. 190–194. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22779604 [in Russian].
- Arutyunyan A. A. Mediatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse [Mediation in criminal proceedings]. M.: Infotropik Media, 2013. 200 рр. Available at: https://bok.xyz/book/2900243/434e07 [in Russian].
- Yurkov V. V. Primirenie nesovershennoletnego s poterpevshim v ugolovnom prave Rossii i Germanii: dis. ... kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.08 [Reconciliation of a minor with a victim in the criminal law of Russia and Germany: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis: 12.00.08]. Krasnoyarsk, 2012, 237 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/primirenie- nesovershennoletnego-s-poterpevshim-v-ugolovnom-prave-rossii-i-germanii [in Russian].
- Kovyazin A. V. Problemy pravoprimenitel’noi praktiki primireniya v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Issues of Law Enforcement Practice of Conciliation in the Russian Criminal Proceedings]. Rossiiskii sud’ya [Russian Judge], 2017, no. 5, pp. 28–32. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29289590 [in Russian].
- Malysheva O. A. O tselesoobraznosti vnedreniya mediatsii v dosudebnoe ugolovnoe proizvodstvo [On expediency of implementation of mediation in the prejudicial criminal proceedings]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian Investigator], 2015, no. 17, pp. 17–20. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24148611 [in Russian].
- Gorsky V. V. Mediator – novyi uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva? [Mediator – a new participant in criminal proceedings?]. In: Ugolovnoe proizvodstvo: protsessual’naya teoriya i kriminalisticheskaya praktika: materialy VI Mezhdu- narodnoi nauchno-praktich. konf., 26–27 aprelya 2018 g., g. Simferopol’-Alushta. Otv. red. M. A. Mikhailov, T. V. Omel’chenko: Krymskii federal’nyi universitet imeni V. I. Vernadskogo [Criminal proceedings: procedural theory and forensic practice: proceedings of the VI International research and practical conference, April 26–27, 2018, Simferopol-Alushta. M. A. Mikhailov, T. V. Omelchenko (Eds.): V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Simferopol: IT «ARIAL», 2018, pp. 22–24. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=35015454 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
