INDIRECT COGNITION IN CREATIVE HERITAGE OF S. A. SHEYFER
- Authors: Zaitseva Е.А.1
-
Affiliations:
- Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Department of Criminal Process of the Educational and Scientific Complex for Preliminary Investigation in International Affairs, Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 5, No 4 (2019)
- Pages: 15-22
- Section: Personalia
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/7581
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2019-5-4-15-22
- ID: 7581
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article analyses the contribution of S. A. Sheyfer to the development of criminal procedure exercises on proof, cognition and investigative actions. The phenomenon of indirect cognition in the structure of criminal procedure proving is considered. The author, when analyzing this form of cognition, relies on an «instrumental» approach to understanding mediated cognition of meaningful information. The article discusses whether the judicial examination is an investigative action. It is justified that during the forensic examination the investigator carries out cognitive operations through a judicial expert. It is shown that not only the actions of the investigator are included in the structure of the investigative action – the appointment and production of judicial examination, but also the research carried out by the judicial expert is also carried out in criminal procedure. During the study, the expert implements his criminal procedure status by entering into appropriate legal relations with the investigator. The author polemizes with scientists who deny that the judicial examination has the properties of an investigative action.
About the authors
Е. А. Zaitseva
Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Department of Criminal Process of the Educational and Scientific Complex for Preliminary Investigation in International Affairs, Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Sheyfer S. A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya [Evidences and proving in criminal cases: issues of theory and legal regulation]. M.: Norma, 2009, 240 p. Available at: https://unotices.com/book. php?id=268406 [in Russian].
- Belkin A. R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Theory of proving in criminal proceedings]. M.: Norma, 2005, 528 p. Available at: https://biblio-online.ru/book/teoriya-dokazyvaniya-v-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve-v-2-ch-chast-1-421135 (accessed 19.09.2019) [in Russian].
- Orlov Yu. K. Problemy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse [Problems of evidence theory in criminal proceedings]. M.: Yurist, 2009, 175 p. Available at: https://zh.b-ok.cc/book/3137826/900c24 [in Russian].
- Grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnik dlya studentov vysshikh yuridicheskikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Otv. red. V. V. Yarkov. 10-e izd-e, pererab. i dop. [Civil process: textbook for students of higher law schools. V. V. Yarkov (Ed.). 10th edition, revised and enlarged]. M.: Statut, 2017, 720 p. Available at: https://znanium. com/bookread2.php?book=950086&spec=1.
- Kurs dokazatel'stvennogo prava: Grazhdanskii protsess. Arbitrazhnyi protsess. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo. S. F. Afanas'ev, O. V. Baulin, I. N. Luk'yanova i dr.; pod red. M. A. Fokinoi. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Course of evidentiary Law: Civil procedure. Arbitration process. Administrative proceedings. S. F. Afanasyev, O. V. Baulin, I. N. Lukyanova et al. M. A. Fokina (Ed.). 2nd edition, revised and enlarged]. M.: Statut, 2019, 656 p. Available at: https://b-ok.xyz/ book/2902860/3004c1 [in Russian].
- Maslova M. V. Sushchnost' ugolovnoprotsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nogo sudoproizvodstva [Essence of Criminal Procedure Proof in Terms of Adversarial Proceedings]. Sovremennoe pravo [The Modern Law Magazine], 2015, no. 6, pp. 113–120. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=23661815 [in Russian].
- Kurylev S. V. Osnovy teorii dokazyvaniya v sovetskom pravosudii [Foundations of the theory of proof in Soviet justice]. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU, 1969, 204 p. Available at: http://www.pravo.by/upload/pdf/izbrannyetrudy/kurilev_izbrannie_trudi.pdf [in Russian].
- Shafer S. A. Sledstvennye deistviya – pravomerny li novye traktovki? [Investigative Action – the Legitimacy of New Interpretation?]. Lex Russica, 2015, no. 10, pp. 115–127. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2015.107.10.115127 [in Russian].
- Sheyfer S. A. Sledstvennye deistviya. Osnovaniya, protsessual'nyi poryadok i dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie [Investigative actions. Grounds, procedural order and evidentiary value]. M.: Yurlitinform, 2004, 184 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20023807 [in Russian].
- Rossinsky S. B. Ponyatie i sushchnost' sledstvennykh deistvii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: diskussiya prodolzhaetsya [The Concept and Essence of Investigative Actions in Criminal Proceedings: the Debate Continues]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice], 2015, no. 2, pp. 16–31. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=23236464 [in Russian].
- Zotov A. Yu. Sledovatel'-kriminalist: dolzhnostnoe litso ili protsessual'naya figura? [Criminal investigator: official or procedural figure?]. Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Volgograd Academy of the Russian Internal Affairs Ministry’s Digest], 2016, Issue 1 (36), pp. 128–132. Available at: https://elibrary. ru/item.asp?id=30523019 [in Russian].
- Zotov A. Yu. Dolzhnostnye litsa organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya kak sub"ekty ugolovno-protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Officials of preliminary investigation bodies as subjects of criminal procedure activities: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Volgograd, 2018, 253 p. Available at: https://pravo.studio/protsess-rf-ugolovnyiy/doljnostnyie-litsa-organov-predvaritelnogo.html [in Russian].
- Raimzhanova N. A. Normativnaya reglamentatsiya ispol'zovaniya spetsial'nykh znanii v ugolovno-protsessual'nom zakonodatel'stve Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki i Rossiiskoi Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Normative regulation of the use of special knowledge in the criminal procedure legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Volgograd, 2015, 263 p. Available at: http://konf.xpdf.ru/18yuridicheskie/411957-1-normativnaya-reglamentaciya-ispolzovaniya-specialnih-znaniy-ugolovno-processualnom-zakonodatelstve-kirgizskoy-respubl.php [in Russian].
Supplementary files
