PURPOSE OF PUNISHMENT IN TERMS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BY THE ABBREVIATED FORM OF INQUIRY


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the article the author analyzes the order and feature of sentencing in criminal cases, the inquiry on which was carried out in a shortened form. Specific examples from judicial practice demonstrate the complexity of the implementation of the principle of individualization of punishment in this category of cases due to the establishment of the legislative limit of the upper limit of punishment. To obtain objective data, the comparative analysis is based on the results of consideration of criminal cases of crimes under Article 314.1 of the Criminal Code. In addition, the article focuses on the circumstances that contribute to and prevent the production of a shortened form of inquiry, as well as analyzes the procedure of judicial proceedings and the procedure for holding a court hearing in criminal cases, the preliminary investigation of which was conducted under a simplified scheme. Based on the findings, the author suggests ways to improve the current legislation, one of which is to amend Article 62 of the Criminal Code. In addition, the article provides examples from the appellate practice of appealing against sentences handed down in criminal cases investigated in a shortened form.

About the authors

M. F. Mingalimova

Department of Public Prosecutor’s Supervision of Performance of Laws in Operational Search Activity and Participation of the Prosecutor in Criminal Trial, Kazan Legal Institute (branch) of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Alexandrov A. S., Lapatnikov M. V. Starye problemy dokazatel’stvennogo prava v novoi ugolovno-protsessual’noi upakovke «sokrashchennogo doznaniya» [Old problems of the law of evidence in new criminal and procedural packing of «the reduced inquiry»]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. Nizhny Novgorod:
  2. Izd-vo Nizhegor. akad. MVD Rossii, 2013, no. 22, pp. 23–Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20155658 [in Russian].
  3. Dolya E. A Osobennosti dokazyvaniya pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokrashchennoi forme [Peculiarities of proving in carrying Features of evidence in the production of inquiry in an abbreviated form]. Rossiiskii sud’ya [Russian Judge], 2013, no. 6, pp. 43–46. Available at: http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/5609/5615/6/ [in Russian].
  4. Voronov D. A., Kalnitsky V. V., Muravyev K. V. Kontseptsiya doznaniya v sokrashchennoi forme: dostizheniya i voprosy sovershenstvovaniya [The concept of inquiry in abbreviated form: achievements and issues of
  5. improvement]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2013, no. 3, pp. 81–Available at: http://www.jurpro.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/UP-03-13.html#z11 [in Russian].
  6. Nasonova I. A. Otdel’nye problemy sokrashchennoi formy doznaniya [Problems in Carrying Out Foreshortened Probe and Interrogation]. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii [Proceedings of Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia], 2017, no. 1, pp. 95–98. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28880092 [in Russian].
  7. Podkovyrova Yu. S. Sokrashchennaya forma doznaniya – predely dokazyvaniya [A reduced form of inquiry – scope of proving]. Zakonnost’ [Zakonnost], 2018, no. 3, pp. 57–59. Available at: http://pressa-lex.
  8. ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/03-html#z14 [in Russian].
  9. Shaydullina E. D. Doznanie v sokrashchennoi forme i razumnost’ srokov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Inquiry in the reduced form and rationality of terms of criminal trial]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo
  10. instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA Russia], 2017, no. (27), pp. 58–61. Available at: http://www.vestnikkui.ru/arhive/2017/1_27_2017.pdf [in Russian].
  11. Otchety dannykh federal’nogo statisticheskogo nablyudeniya po forme 1-E prokuratury Respubliki Tatarstan za 2017-2018 gg. [Reports of Federal Statistical Observation data on the form of the 1st Prosecutor’s Offi ce of the Republic of Tatarstan for the period of 2017–2018] [in Russian].
  12. Sumin A. A. Sokrashchennoe doznanie: mertvorozhdennoe ditya reformatorov ugolovnogo protsessa [Short inquiry: stillborn child reformers of criminal legal proceeding]. Advokat [Lawyer], 2013, no. 10, pp. 5–8. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20378773 [in Russian].
  13. Arkhiv Privolzhskogo raionnogo suda g. Kazani za 2018 god: ugolovnoe delo № 1-603/2018 [Archive of the Volga district court of Kazan for 2018: criminal case № 1-603/2018] [in Russian].
  14. Bolshoi yuridicheskii slovar’. Pod red. A. V. Mal’ko [Big law dictionary. A. V. Malko (Ed.)]. M.: Prospekt, 2009. Retrieved from legal reference system «Garant». Available at: https://www.studmed.ru/malko-av-red-bolshoyyuridicheskiy-slovar_63dcb302518.html [in Russian].
  15. Arkhiv Aninnskogo raionnogo suda Voronezhskoi oblasti za 2018 god: ugolovnoe delo № 1-62/2018 [Archive of the Aninsk district court of the Voronezh Region for 2018: criminal case № 1-62/2018] [in Russian].
  16. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Pod red. F. R. Sundurova [Criminal law of Russia. General part: Textbook for universities. F. R. Sundurov (Ed.)]. Kazan: Izdatel’stvo Kazanskogo universiteta, 2003, 647 р. Available at: http://ural-education.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/%D0%BF.%D1%80.-
  17. %D0%A1%D1%3%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1
  18. %3%D1%8 0%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0 -
  19. %D0%A%D0%A0.-%D0%A2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1
  20. %85%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0-
  21. %D0%%D0%90.-%D0%A3%D0%B3%D0%BE%
  22. D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE%D%B5-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE-
  23. %D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D%B8.-%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B0%D1%8F-
  24. %D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C.pdf [in Russian].
  25. Kruglikov L. L. O printsipakh naznacheniya nakazaniya [On the principles of sentencing]. Problemy teorii ugolovnogo prava: izbrannye stat’i 1982–1989 gg. [Problems of theory of criminal law: selected articles 1982–1989]. Yaroslavl, 1999, 591 p. Available at: http://www.lib.
  26. uniyar.ac.ru/edocs/iuni/pdf [in Russian].
  27. Prigovor Kaltanskogo raionnogo suda Kemerovskoi oblasti ot 14 iyunya 2017 g. po delu № 1-99/2017 [Verdict of the Kaltan district court of the Kemerovo Region as of June 14, 2017 with regard toc case № 1-99/2017]. Available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/DCbYJO4AsTNa/ [in Russian]; Prigovor Shakhunskogo raionnogo suda Nizhegorodskoi oblasti
  28. ot iyunya 2015 g. po delu № 1-83/2015 [Verdict of the Shakhunsky district court of Nizhny Novgorod Region as of June 29, 2015 with regard to case № 1-83/2015]. Available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/
  29. LAuLHiAbUcda/ [in Russian]; Prigovor Stepnovskogo raionnogo suda Stavropolskogo kraya ot iyulya 2015 g. po delu № 1-43/2015 [Verdict of Stepnovsky district court of Stavropol Region as of July 28, 2015 with regard to case № 1–43/2015]. Available at: http://www.gcourts.ru/
  30. case/(accessed 28.11.2018) [in Russian].
  31. Arkhiv Sovetskogo raionnogo suda g. Kazani za 2018 g.: ugolovnoe delo № 1-768/2018 [Archive of the Soviet district court of Kazan for 2018: criminal case № 1–768/2018]. [in Russian].
  32. Arkhiv Privolzhskogo raionnogo suda g. Kazani za 2018 g.: ugolovnoe delo № 1-412/2018 [Archive of the Volga district court of Kazan for 2018: criminal case № 1-412/2018]. [in Russian].
  33. Arkhiv Sakmarskogo raionnogo suda Orenburgskoi oblasti za 2018 god: ugolovnoe delo №1 (1)-64/2018 [Archive of the Sakmarsky district court of the Orenburg region for 2018: criminal case № 1 (1)-64/2018] [in Russian].
  34. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Krym ot 16 avgusta 2018 g. po delu № 22-2081/2018 [Appeal decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Crimea as of August 16, 2018 with regard to case № 22-2081/2018]. Available at: http://sudact.ru/
  35. regular/doc/kB0cI8gkMf11/?regular-txt=сокращенная+форма+дознания®ular-case_doc=®ular-lawchu
  36. nkinfo=Статья++Принятие+заявления+к+производству+арбитржного+суда%28АПК+РФ%29®ul
  37. ar-doc_type=®ular-date_from=01.2018®ulard
  38. a t e _ t o =1 . 0 2 . 2 019&r e g u l a r -wo r k f l ow_
  39. stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ularjudge=&_=
  40. &snippet_pos=494#snippet (accessed 02.2019) [in Russian].
  41. Arkhiv Voroshilovskogo raionnogo suda g. Rostov-na-Donu za 2018 god: ugolovnoe delo № 1-433/2018 [Archive of Voroshilov district court of Rostov-on-Don for 2018: criminal case № 1-433/2018] [in Russian].
  42. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Volgogradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 24 iyulya 2018 g. № 22-2893/2018 [Appeal resolution of the Volgograd regional court as of July 24, 2018 № 22-2893/2018]. Available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/aHEKPO1p3ONB/?regular-txt=сокращ
  43. енная+форма+дознания®ular-case_doc=®ularlawchunkinfo=&
  44. regular-doc_type=1006®ulardate_
  45. from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_
  46. stage=20®ular-area=®ular-court=®ularjudge=&_=
  47. &snippet_pos=1608#snippet (accessed 02.2019) [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Mingalimova M.F.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies