ON THE ISSUE OF PROCEDURAL POWERS OF THE SPECIALIST IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article discusses the problematic aspects of legal regulation

of the procedural powers of the specialist. The points of view of

the scientists on the nature of the procedural status of the party to

the criminal proceeding are analyzed. The need for the adjustments

to the Article 58 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian

Federation with the aim of the correct assessment of reliability of

the opinion of the specialist is argued.

About the authors

O. S. Sergeeva

Legal Institute, Baikal State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru

References

  1. Bezlepkin B.T. Kommentarii k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi). 13-e izd-e, pererab. i dop. [Commentaries to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (clause-by-clause). 13th edition, revised and enlarged]. M.: Prospekt, 2016, 576 p. [in Russian].
  2. Вологина Е.В. Metodika rassledovaniia prestuplenii, sovershennykh zhenshchinami: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Methods of investigation of crimes performed by women: Candidates of Law thesis]. Volgograd, 2002, 208 p. [in Russian].
  3. Grishina E.P. Sovershenstvovanie normativno pravovogo regulirovaniia voprosov uchastiia spetsialista v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii [Improvement of normative and legal regulation of issues of participation of a specialist in the criminal proceedings of Russia]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’
  4. [Russian Investigator], 2005, no. 10, pp. 11–[in Russian].
  5. Zaitseva E.A. Primenenie spetsial’nykh znanii skvoz’ prizmu Federal’nogo zakona ot 4 marta 2013 g. № 23-FZ [Application of special knowledge through the prism of the Federal Law
  6. dated March 4, № 23-FZ]. Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika [Law and Economics], 2013, no. 6, pp. 30–34 [in Russian].
  7. Isaeva L.M. Iuridicheskii konsul’tant. Ezhemesiachnyi informatsionno-analiticheskii zhurnal [Legal adviser. Monthly research and information journal], 2005, no. 7, p. 9 [in Russian].
  8. Kornakova S.V. Logika dlia iuristov: ucheb. [Logic for lawyers: textbook]. Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGUEP, 2015, 122 p. [in Russian].
  9. Kornakova S.V., Chubykin A.V. O polnomochiiakh prokurora v stadii vozbuzhdeniia ugolovnogo dela [On authorities of the public prosecutor on the stage of initiation of criminal
  10. case]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal [Criminalists Library Scientific Journal], 2014, no. 1(, pp. 110–114 [in Russian].
  11. Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse: ucheb.-prakt. posob. [Proving in the criminal process: workbook]. М.: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009, 344 p. [in Russian].
  12. Markova T.Yu. Zakliuchenie spetsialista dokazatel’stvo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve? [Expert opinion proving in the criminal procedure?]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal
  13. Judicial Proceeding], 2010, no. 2, pp. 13–[in Russian].
  14. Makhov V.N. Ispol’zovanie znanii svedushchikh lits pri rassledovanii prestuplenii [Knowledge
  15. deployment of experts at the investigation of crimes]. М.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2000, p. [in Russian].
  16. Ovsyannikov I.V. Zakliuchenie i pokazanie spetsialista [Conclusion and expert evidence].
  17. Zakonnost [Legitimacy], 2005, no. 7, pp. 32–[in Russian].
  18. Semenov E.A. Zakliuchenie spetsialista kak istochnik dokazatel’stv [Expert opinion as a source of evidence]. Advokatskaia praktika [Advocates Practice], 2010, no. 2, pp. 15–17 [in Russian].
  19. Sementsov Е.А. Spetsialist ne preduprezhdaetsia ob ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za dachu zavedomo lozhnogo pokazaniia: upushchenie zakonodatelia ili vyzvannaia neobkhodimost’? [The expert is not noticed about the criminal responsibility for perjury: neglect of a legislator or forced
  20. necessity]. Nauka i praktika [Science and practice], 2014, no. 3(, pp. 92–94 [in Russian].
  21. Stepanov V., Shapiro L. Pokazaniia spetsialista v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Expert evidence in criminal proceedings]. Ugolovnoye Pravo Journal, 2005, no. 4, pp. 8184 [in Russian].
  22. Shapiro L.G. Situatsionnyi podkhod k ispol’zovaniiu spetsial’nykh znanii pri rassledovanii prestuplenii v sfere ekonomicheskoi deiatel’nosti [Situational approach to the use of special knowledge at the investigation of crimes in the sphere of economic activity]. Ekspert-Kriminalist
  23. [Expert Criminalist], 2013, no. 3, pp. 15–[in Russian].
  24. Shchenina T.E. Nekotorye voprosy privlecheniia zashchitnikom spetsialista pri osushchestvlenii zashchity po ugolovnym delam [Some issues of the attraction by the defender of an expert in the course of criminal defense]. Biznes v zakone [Business in Law], 2007, no. 4, pp. 114–115 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Sergeeva O.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies