DIFFERENCES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERAL LEGAL MODEL FOR REVIEWING JUDICIAL ACTS IN CRIMINAL AND ARBITRATION, CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
- Authors: Sharipova A.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Law, Bashkir State University
- Issue: Vol 6, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 88-95
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/8359
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-4-88-95
- ID: 8359
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The novelty of the article is determined by the comparative analysis of the institutions of appeal, cassation and supervisory review of cases in various branches of judicial law. The purpose of this analysis is to identify general trends in the regulation of the right of appeal, appeal of interim judicial acts, the terms of appeal, the procedure for consideration and powers of the court in verification instances, the grounds for revoking judicial acts in criminal, arbitration, civil and administrative proceedings. The task was to identify unjustified differences between similar rules of procedural branches and choose the best version of regulatory regulation. The article uses methods of system analysis and synthesis, comparative legal method. As a result of the study, the unified legal model of reviews for all procedural branches was confirmed, and shortcomings of its implementation in criminal proceedings were established. In conclusion, there is evidence that the identified shortcomings significantly reduce the overall quality of justice in criminal case reviews in comparison with their counterparts in other branches of law.
About the authors
A. R. Sharipova
Institute of Law, Bashkir State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: nord-wind23@mail.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Mateychuk V. I. Sravnitel'naia kharakteristika pravovoi reglamentatsii proizvodstva v sude vtoroi instantsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i drugikh vidakh sudoproizvodstv [Comparative characteristics of the legal regulation of proceedings in a second instance court within criminal proceedings and other types of proceedings]. Rossiiskii sud'ia [Russian Judge], 2018, no. 10, pp. 30–34. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36290345 [in Russian].
- Andreeva O. I., Rukavishnikova A. A. Reformirovannoe proizvodstvo v sude kassatsionnoi instantsii: sootnoshenie chastnogo i publichnogo nachal [Reformed proceeding in cassation court: correlation of private and public basis]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2020, no. 3, pp. 3–7. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43130657 [in Russian].
- Treshcheva E. A. Status prokurora v arbitrazhnom protsesse nuzhdaetsia v sovershenstvovanii [Prosecutor's status in the arbitration procedure needs improving]. Lex Russica, 2015, no. 10, pp. 57–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2015.107.10.057-063 [in Russian].
- Problemy razvitiia protsessual'nogo prava Rossii: monografiia. Pod red. V. M. Zhuikova [Zhuikov V. M. (Ed.) Problems of the development of Russian procedural law: monograph]. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M, 2016, 224 p. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29283456.
- Gordeychik S. A. Zloupotrebleniia storony zashchity pri podache dopolnitel'noi apelliatsionnoi zhaloby [The abusive practice of the defense at filing of an additional appeal]. Advokatskaia praktika [Advokate's Practice], 2019, no. 5, pp. 7–9. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41035131.
- Kudryavtseva A. V., Dik D. G., Spiridonov M. S. Proizvodstvo v sude kassatsionnoi instantsii: osobennosti novogo pravovogo regulirovaniia [Court of cassation proceedings: peculiarities of new legal regulation]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2019, no. 1, pp. 83–88. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38577466 [in Russian].
- Zhuykov V. M., Dolova M. O. Aktual'nye problemy unifikatsii protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva [Current Problems of Unifi cation of Procedural Legislation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 121–135. doi: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.11 [in Russian].
- Dikarev I. S. Nadzorno-kassatsionnaia forma peresmotra sudebnykh reshenii v ugolovnom protsesse: teoreticheskie osnovy i puti sovershenstvovaniia: dis. ... d-ra iurid. nauk [Supervisory-cassation form of the revision of court decisions in criminal proceedings: theoretical foundations and ways of improvement: Doctoral of Law's thesis]. Volgograd, 2016, 478 p. [in Russian].
- Pshipiy R. M. Istoricheskii analiz ispol'zovaniia zakonodatelem blanketnoi formy dispozitsii ugolovnopravovoi normy [Historical analysis of use by the legislator blanketna of the form of the disposition of the criminal rule of law]. Rossiiskii sledovatel' [Russian Investigator], 2012, no. 23, pp. 9–10. Available at: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/57598-istoricheskij-analiz-ispolzovaniya-zakonodatelem-blanketnoj-formy-dispozicii; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18352814 [in Russian].
- Filatova M. A. Sovershenstvovanie vnutrigosudarstvennykh sredstv pravovoi zashchity v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy [Improving domestic remedies in the Russian Federation: problems and prospects]. In: Rossiiskii ezhegodnik Evropeiskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka [Russian yearbook of the European convention on human rights] (issue 1), 2015, no. 1, pp. 322–347 [in Russian].
- Sharapova D. V. Uchastie osuzhdennogo v sude apelliatsionnoi instantsii [Participation of the convicted person in the appeal instance court]. Rossiiskii sud'ia [Russian Judge], 2016, no. 4, pp. 33–37. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25907181 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
