LEGAL FEATURES OF THE TORT OBLIGATIONS ARISING AT CAUSING OF HARM BY THE SOURCE OF THE INCREASED DANGER

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article deals with the problems of understanding the essence of civil liability arising from the infliction of harm by a source of the increased danger. The concepts that defi ne the source of the increased danger as an object and as an activity that creates an increased danger to the world are analyzed. The analysis of the current legislation and the existing civil doctrine allowed to draw a conclusion about dependence of recognition of this or that activity/object as a source of the increased danger on conditions of implementation of such activity/conditions of existence of object. The author gives a generalized description of the conditions and grounds of the civil liability under consideration. The idea is substantiated because of the refusal of the legislator from considering guilt of the owner a source of increased danger in which responsibility mediated event not occurred, and with a specifi c probability of occurrence. The specificity of liability for causing harm by a source of the increased danger, in which the illegality or legality of the behavior of the subject at the time of causing harm in the appointment of civil liability is indifferent, is indicated.

About the authors

S. R. Deryugina

Volgograd Institute for the Humanities

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Rossiiskoe zakonodatel'stvo X–XX vekov: v 9 t. [Russian legislation of the X–XX centuries: in 9 vols.]. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1984. Vol. 1. Legislation of Ancient Russia, 1256 pp. [in Russian].
  2. Solomin S. K. Institut vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti: nekotorye aspekty pravotvorcheskogo i pravoprimenitel'nogo kharaktera [Institute of the
  3. indemnification caused by the source of the increased danger: some aspects of law-making and law-enforcement character]. Vlast' Zakona, 2015, no. 2, pp. 51–Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24038612 [in Russian].
  4. Antimonov B. S. Grazhdanskaya otvetstvennost' za vred, prichinennyi istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti [Civil liability for damage caused by a source of the increased danger]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1952, 201 p. Available at: http://www.ex-jure.ru/law/news.php?newsid=23 [in Russian].
  5. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26 yanvarya 2010 № 1 «O primenenii sudami grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva, reguliruyushchego otnosheniya po obyazatel'stvam vsledstvie prichineniya vreda zhizni ili zdorov'yu grazhdanina» [Resolution of the Plenum of the
  6. Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated January 26, № 1 «About application by the courts of the civil legislation regulating the relations on obligations owing to causing harm to life or health of the citizen»]. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2010, no. 24, pp. 3–8. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_96790 [in Russian].
  7. Grazhdanskoe pravo. T. 3. Pod red. A. P. Sergeeva, Yu. K. Tolstogo [Civil right. Volume 3. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoy (Eds.)]. Moscow: Statut, 1999, 453 p. Available at: https://www.studmed.ru/sergeev-ap-tolstoy-yuk-grazhdanskoe-pravo-tom-3_b7d605ac420.html [in Russian].
  8. Solomin S. K. Institut vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti: nekotorye aspekty pravotvorcheskogo i pravoprimenitel'nogo kharaktera [Institute of the
  9. indemnification caused by the source of the increased danger: some aspects of law-making and law-enforcement character]. Vlast' Zakona, 2015, no. 2, pp. 51–Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24038612 [in Russian].
  10. Antimonov B. S. Grazhdanskaya otvetstvennost' za vred, prichinennyi istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti [Civil liability for damage caused by a source of the increased danger]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1952, 201 p. Available at: http://www.ex-jure.ru/law/news.php?newsid=23 [in Russian].
  11. Rossiiskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. T. 2. Pod red. E. A. Sukhanova [Russian civil law. Vol. 2. E. A. Sukhanov (Ed.)]. Moscow: Statut, 2011, 1208 p. [in Russian].
  12. Agarkov M. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. Tom 2 [Selected works on civil law. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Statut, 2012, 533 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19857553 [in Russian].
  13. Fleishits E. A. Obyazatel'stva iz prichineniya vreda i iz neosnovatel'nogo obogashcheniya [Obligation from causing of harm and unjust enrichment]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1951, 301 p. Available at: https://b-ok2.org/book/3042510/aa263f [in Russian].
  14. Krasavchikov O. A. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti [Compensation of harm caused by a source of the increased danger]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1966, 289 p. Available at: https://booksee.org/book/526603 [in Russian].
  15. Maidannik L. A., Sergeeva N. Yu. Material'naya otvetstvennost' za povrezhdenie zdorov'ya [Material responsibility for damage to health]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1953, 213 p. Available at: https://naukaprava.ru/catalog/297/560946/37437 [in Russian].
  16. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. T. 2. Pod red. V. P. Gribanovа, S. M. Korneevа [Soviet civil law. Vol. 2. Gribanov V. P., Korneev S. M. (Eds.)]. Moscow, 1980, 306 p. Available at: https://b-ok.xyz/book/3091686/a8a12d [in Russian].
  17. Krasavchikov O. A. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti [Compensation of harm caused by a source of the increased danger]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1966, 289 p. Available at: https://booksee.org/book/526603 [in Russian].
  18. Kazachenok O. P. Tsifrovye prava v sovremennom grazhdanskom oborote: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya [Digital rights in modern civil turnover: trends and prospects of development]. Khozyaistvo i pravo [Business and Law], 2019, no. 11 (514), pp. 39–44. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41238823 [in Russian].
  19. Deryugina T.V. Teoreticheskie i prakticheski problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya kategorii «ubytki», «vred» i «ushcherb» [The Theoretical and Practical Problems of Interpreting and Applying the Categories of «Loss», «Harm», «Damage»]. Legal Concept. Pravovaya paradigma [Legal Concept = Pravovaya paradigma], 2018, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2018.1.2 [in Russian].
  20. Sokolova E. V. O nekotorykh voprosakh otvetstvennosti voinskoi chasti za imushchestvennyi vred, prichinennyi v rezul'tate ispol'zovaniya istochnikov povyshennoi opasnosti voennogo naznacheniya [On some
  21. questions liability of the military unit for property damage caused by ultra-hazardous military sources]. Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh, 2013, no. 5, pp. 112–Available at: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/69713-nekotorykh-voprosakh-otvetstvennosti-voinskoj-chasti-imushhestvennyj-vred [in Russian].
  22. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda kassatsionnoi instantsii Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 17 marta 2003 g. po delu № F08-427/2003 [Resolution of the Commercial court of cassation instance of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus district dated March 17, 2003 with regard to case № F08-427/2003]. Retrieved from legal reference system «Garant» [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2020 Deryugina S.R.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies