CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FORM AND WRITING OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AS AN INSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the established criminal procedure form, which provides for writing the pre-trial proceedings as a permanent attribute to ensure the achievement of the purpose of criminal proceedings, and the observed global trends in the digitization of criminal proceedings. Constant «offensive» manifestations of scientific and technological progress, in most cases regarded as a positive phenomenon, acting for the good of society, in criminal proceedings enter into confrontation with the achievements of criminal procedural science. If earlier the writing of criminal proceedings allowed to ensure the procedural «purity» of materials used in the process of evidence in a criminal case, then at present digitalization of criminal procedure relations threatens the traditions of evidentiary law that have been forming for decades. The article raises the question of the need to form a different approach to the concept of the criminal procedure form.

About the authors

V. G. Stepanova

Department of Criminal Procedure, East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Guskova A. P. K voprosu o protsessual’noi forme ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii [On the issue of the procedural form of criminal proceedings in Russia]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of the Orenburg State University], 2008, no. 83, pp. 11–17. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=11160472 [in Russian].
  2. Foinitsky I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Tom 1 [Course of criminal proceedings. Vol. 1]. SPb.: Izd-vo «Al’fa», 1996, 552 p. Available at: http:// kalinovsky-k.narod.ru/b/foinitsky/t-1 [in Russian].
  3. Bertovsky L. V. Tekhnologiya blokcheina v ugolovnom protsesse kak element tsifrovogo sudoproizvodstva [Technology blockchain in the criminal process as part of the digital proceedings]. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki [Economic problems and legal practice], 2017, no. 6, pp. 226–230. Available at: http://urvak.ru/articles/probl-vypusk-6-tekhnologiya-blokcheyna-v-ugolovnom [in Russian].
  4. Kachalova O. V., Tsvetkov Yu. A. Elektronnoe ugolovnoe delo – instrument modernizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Electronic Criminal Case as a Tool for Development of Criminal Proceedings]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie [Russian Justice], 2015, no. 2, pp. 95–101. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23765975 [in Russian].
  5. Bertovsky L. V. Tsifrovoe sudoproizvodstvo: problemy stanovleniya [Digital litigation: problems of formation]. In: Problemy primeneniya ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva: Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Problems of application of criminal and criminal procedure legislation: Collection of materials of the international research and practical conference]. Simferopol, 2018, pp. 173–178. Available at: https:// elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35012508 [in Russian].
  6. Popova I. A., Zinchenko I. A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress i problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Scientific and technological progress and the problems of improving criminal procedural legislation]. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve [Gaps in Russian legislation], 2013, no. 2, pp. 178–183. Available at: http://urvak.ru/articles/ probe-vypusk-2-nauchno-tekhnicheskie-progress-i-pr [in Russian].
  7. Federal’nyi zakon «O vnesenii izmenenii v stat’i 76.1 i 145.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 27.12.2018 № 533-FZ [Federal Law «On Amendments to Articles 76.1 and 145.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation» dd. 27.12.2018 № 533-FZ]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAW_314650 [in Russian].
  8. Borisevich G. Y. Dokumenty kak dokazatel’stva v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Documents as proofs in the Russian criminal procedure]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], 2010, Issue 1 (7), pp. 202–215. Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/v/dokumenty-kak-dokazatelstva-v-rossiyskom-ugolovnom-protsesse [in Russian].
  9. Markelov A. G. K voprosu o primenenii yuridicheskikh konstruktsii pri sostavlenii protsessual’nykh dokumentov po ugolovnomu delu [On the issue of the use of legal structures in the preparation of procedural documents in a criminal case]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Juridical Techniques], 2013, no. 7 (Part 2), pp. 470–473. Available at: https://elibrary. ru/item.asp?id=20275182 [in Russian].
  10. Guskova A. P. K voprosu o protsessual’noi forme ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii [On the issue of the procedural form of criminal proceedings in Russia].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Stepanova V.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies