SUBSTANTIVE FACTORS OF LEGAL AND ANTI-CORRUPTION EXAMINATION AS A MEANS TO IDENTIFY CORRUPTION RISKS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the theoretical and application plan the article examines the relationship between legal and anticorruption examination and their importance for identifying corruption risks in municipal lawmaking. As a research task, the author attempted to evaluate the findings about the overlap between the subject of legal and anti-corruption examination. Based on practical experience, it has been argued that legal defects, which are factors involving corruption, can be identified without anti-corruption examination. Taking into account the interpretation of the existing procedural law, the analysis and synthesis of scientific and practical material on challenging the rules of law showed that the grounds for challenging regulatory legal acts (rules of law) can be either the result of legal or anti-corruption examination. This allegation is also complemented by a consideration of the relationship between the concepts of the «conditions for corruption» and «lack of legal clarity». The article summarizes the new material on the studied topic, and also proposed a new classification of conditions for corruption.

About the authors

O. V. Kostunina

Department of Constitutional Law and Theory of Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Abliev T. M. Pravila antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy munitsipal’nykh normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov munitsipal’nykh normativnykh pravovykh aktov v organakh mestnogo samoupravleniya [Rules of anti-corruption assessment of municipal laws and regulations and their drafts in local government]. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Society: Politics, Economics, Law], 2017, no. 5, p. 83. doi: 10.24158/pep.2017.5.21 [in Russian].
  2. Vanteyeva N. V. Vidy ekspertiz munitsipal’nykh pravovykh aktov [Types of Validating Municipal Legal Certificates]. Vestnik YarGU. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidov. Seriya Gumanitarnie nauki], 2012, no. 2 (20), pp. 93–96. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=17799543 [in Russian].
  3. O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov polnost’yu ili v chasti: postanovleniya Plenuma VS RF ot 29 noyab. 2007 g. № 48 [On the practice of courts hearing cases challenging regulatory legal acts in full or in part: decisions of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation from November 29, 2007 № 48]. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2008, no. 1. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http:// www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_73167 [in Russian].
  4. Yuzhakov V. N., Efremov A. A. Sudebnaya praktika po voprosam antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov: sovremennyе tendentsii i puti sovershenstvovaniya [Court Practice Concerning AntiCorruption Expertise of Laws and Regulations and Drafts Thereof: Current Trends and Improvement Methods]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure], 2016, no. 10, pp. 23–29. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27032713 [in Russian].
  5. Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov: postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 26 fevr. 2010 g. № 96 [On Anti-Corruption Expertise of Laws and Regulations and Drafts Thereof: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation as of February 26, 2010 № 96]. Sobr. zakonodatel’stva RF [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2010, no. 10, Article 1084. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/197633/ [in Russian].
  6. Chernogor N. N., Zaloilo M. V. Ekspertiza v pravotvorchestve: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i voprosy ego sovershenstvovaniya [Expertise in lawmaking: problems of legal regulation and issues of its improvement]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2018, no. 3, pp. 100–108. doi: 10.24411/2078-5356-2018-10313 [in Russian].
  7. Bazhukova J. A., Elfimov A.A. Nekotorye problemy antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy regional’nogo i munitsipal’nogo zakonodatel’stva na primere respubliki Komi [Elektronnyi resurs] [Some problems of anticorruption expertise of regional and municipal legislation by example of the Komi Republic]. URL: www.gramota. net/materials/3/2013/7-1/3.htm (accessed 12.09.2018) [in Russian].
  8. O protivodeistvii korruptsii: feder. zakon ot 25 dek. 2008 g. № 273-FZ [On corruption combating: Federal Law as of December 25, 2008 № 273-FZ]. Sobr. zakonodatel’stva RF [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2008, no. 52 (part I), Article 6228. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAW_82959 [in Russian].
  9. Klyukovskaya I. N., Melekaev R. K. Teoretiko-metodologicheskoe issledovanie ponyatiya «korruptsiogennost’ zakonodatel’stva» [Theoretical-methodological investigation of the «corruption susceptibility of legislation» concept]. Vestnik Stavropol’skogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta [Bulletin of the Stavropol State University], 2011, no. 76, pp. 189–196. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/ teoretiko-metodologicheskoe-issledovanie-ponyatiya-korruptsiogennost-zakonodatelstva [in Russian].
  10. Ignatenko V. V. Antikorruptsionnaya ekonomicheskaya ekspertiza kak raznovidnost’ zakonotvorcheskikh ekspertiz [Anti-corruption economic examination as a kind of legislative examination]. In: Problemy sovremennogo zakonodatel’stva Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: materialy V Mezhdunar. nauch.praktich. konf. (g. Irkutsk, 16–17 sent. 2016 g.): v 2 t. T. 1. [otv. red. S.I. Suslova, A.P. Ushakova] [Problems of modern legislation of Russia and foreign countries: materials of the V International research and practical conference (Irkutsk, September 16–17, 2016): in 2 vols. Vol. 1 [S. I. Suslova, A. P. Ushakov (Eds.)]. Irkutsk, 2016, p. 72. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=27565587 [in Russian].
  11. Korotkova O. A. Organy prokuratury kak sub”ekt antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy normativnykh aktov [Prosecuting authorities as the subject of anticorruption expertise of legal acts]. Vestnik Tambovskogo un-ta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities], 2014, no. 7, p. 124. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21996411 [in Russian].
  12. Khazanov S. D., Bahtina M. S. Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza normativnykh pravovykh aktov kak sredstvo snizheniya korruptsionnykh riskov [Anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts as a mean to reduce corruption risks]. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal], 2016, no. 3, p. 62. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26300219 [in Russian].
  13. O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov i aktov, soderzhashchikh raz”yasneniya zakonodatel’stva i obladayushchikh normativnymi svoistvami: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 dekabrya 2018 № 50 [On the practice of cases challenging regulatory legal acts and acts containing explanations of legislation and having normative features: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of December 25, 2018 №. 50]. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2019, no. 2. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http:// www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_314764 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Kostunina O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies