PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AND THE CATEGORY «INTEREST»


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of problematic aspects of the tasks and purpose of criminal
proceedings. The study substantiated that the task of combating crime does not correspond to the purpose of criminal proceedings of a new protective type, designed to protect the rights and interests violated during the criminal law conflict. Based on the analysis of the norms of Article 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, conclusions are drawn up on the need to reflect in it the restoration approach, a new edition is proposed. In formulating conclusions, the practical significance of the results obtained is substantiated: law enforcement officers understand the targets of their activities and the criminal process as a systemic phenomenon will help to choose the appropriate procedural form for resolving a criminal law conflict and reduce not only material costs, but also punitive impact. The paper substantiates the conclusion that the category of “interest” lies at the basis of criminal procedure, and its implementation is possible with the help of appropriate procedural means. Attention is paid to the low confidence in the work of the system and the subsystems of the criminal process, as a result of which non-traditional methods, such as a polygraph, have been used in proof. The conclusion is formulated about the impossibility of using the results of the use of polygraph in proof in connection with the fact that this contradicts the freedom to evaluate evidence by the subject of proof.

About the authors

I. P. Popova

Department of Criminal Procedure, East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Frolov Yu. A. Naznachenie, tseli i zadachi ugolovnogo protsessa [Assignment, goals and objectives of the criminal process]. Yurist"-Pravoved" [Jurist-Pravoved], 2006, no. 1 (16), pp. 30–34. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36239631 [in Russian].
  2. Tarnavskiy O. A. K voprosu o naznachenii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [To the question about criminal proceeding’s purpose]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of the Orenburg
  3. State University], 2010, no. (109), pp. 147–150. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14805342 [in Russian].
  4. Volodina L. M. Naznachenie, funktsii i zadachi ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The Purpose, Functions and Tasks of Criminal Procedure]. Izvestiya Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta [Izvestiya of Altai State University Journal], 2015, no. 2-2 (86), pp. 14–18. Available at: http://izvestia.asu.ru/ru/article/724/. doi: 10.14258/izvasu(2015)2.2-02 [in Russian].
  5. Markovicheva Е. V. O primirenii storon v sovremennom rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [On concilliation of parties in the current Russian criminal proceedings]. Biblioteka kriminalista [Criinalist’s Library], 2016, no. 5, pp. 281–286. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26739626 [in Russian].
  6. Shafer S. A. Poznavatel'naya funktsiya i protsessual'naya kharakteristika sledstvennykh deistvii [Cognitive essence and legal procedure characteristic of investigation]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie [Pravovedenie], 1980, no. 5, pp. 92–98. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23794137 [in Russian].
  7. Kuz'mina A. V. Kategoriya «interes» v filosofii i prave [Category «interest» in philosophy and law]. M.: Yurid. lit., 2009, 192 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20104988 [in Russian].
  8. Shonin M. Yu. O poznavatel'nom interese v protsesse obucheniya [About Formation of Cognitive Interest in the Course of Training]. Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniya, 2017, no. 1, pp. 27–31. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30585416 [in Russian].
  9. Borisenkov A. A. Ponyatie individual'nogo interesa kak faktor ob"yasneniya natsional'nykh interesov [The Concept of an Individual Interest as a Factor Explanation of National Interest]. Evraziiskii soyuz: Voprosy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Eurasian Union: Issues of International Relations], 2016, Issue 1 (15), pp. 127–142. Available at: http://www.souzpolitolog.ru/ru/ES_1_2016.php [in Russian].
  10. Il'in V. I. Sotsiologiya potrebleniya [Sociology of consumption]. Available at: http://www.consumers.narod.ru/author.html (accessed 28.04.2019) [in Russian].
  11. Maslennikova L. N. Faktory, opredelyayushchie razvitie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii [Factors determining the development of criminal proceedings in Russia]. In: Ugolovnaya yustitsiya: svyaz' vremen. Izbrannye materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 6–8 oktyabrya 2010 goda. Sost. A. V. Smirnov, K. B. Kalinovskii [Criminal justice: the link of times. Selected materials of the international research conference. St. Petersburg, October 6–8, 2010. Compliers A. V. Smirnov, K. B. Kalinovsky]. M.: ZAO «Aktion-Media», 2012, pp. 78–83. Available at: https://www.iuaj.net/node/441 [in Russian].
  12. Smolkova I. V., Mazyuk R. V. Zakonnye, nezakonnye i protsessual'nye interesy obvinyaemogo v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Legal, illegal and procedural interests of the accused person in Russian criminal procedure]. Kriminologicheskii zhurnal Baikal'skogo gos. un-ta ekonomiki i prava [Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law], 2016, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 156–169. doi: 10.17150/1996-7756.2016.10(1).156-169 [in Russian].
  13. Verkhoglazenko V. N. Most mezhdu interesami [The bridge between interests]. Zhivaya psikhologiya [Russian Journal of Humanistic Psychology], 2016, Vol, 3, Issue 4, pp. 295–302. Available at: https:// bgscience.ru/lib/37474 [in Russian].
  14. Lazareva V. A. Ugolovnyi protsess kak sposob zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina (naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Criminal procedure as a way to protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen (appointment of criminal proceedings)]. Lex Russica. 2010, no. 3, pp. 540–550. Available at: http:// lexrussica.ru/articles/article_579.html [in Russian].
  15. Kolokolov N. A. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo: strategiya i taktika [The criminal proceedings: strategy and tactics]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 2016, no. 4, pp. 79–84. Available at: http://
  16. mosumvd.com/izdatelskaya-deyatelnost/periodicheskieizdaniya/vestnik-moskovskogo-universiteta-mvd-rossii/polnotekstovye-nomera-zhurnalov/polnotekstovyenomera-zhurnalov-za-2016-god/2016-04_vmosumvd.pdf [in Russian].
  17. Kolokolov N. A. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: modernizatsionnyi resurs [Code of criminal procedure: modernizing resource]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Vestnik of economic security], 2016, no. 5, pp. 19–23. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28993813 [in Russian].
  18. Mikhailovskaya I. B. Izmenenie zakonodatel'noi modeli rossiiskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Changes in the legislative model of the Russian criminal justice]. M.: Prospekt, 2016, 80 p. Available at: https://
  19. fi ctionbook.ru/author/inga_borisovna_mihayilovskaya/ izmenenie_zakonodatelnoyi_modeli_rossiyi/read_online.html [in Russian].
  20. Shafer S. A. Novelly UPK RF – novye problemy! [Novels of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation – new problems!]. In: Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Actual problems of the modern criminal process in Russia: interuniversity collection of research papers].
  21. Samara: Izd-vo Samarskii universitet, 2010, Issue 5, pp. 322–Available at: http://repo.ssau.ru/bitstream/Aktualnye-problemy-sovremennogo-ugolovnogoprocessa/Novelly-UPK-RF-novye-problemy.pdf
  22. [in Russian].
  23. Shafer S. A. Sledstvennye deistviya – pravomerny li novye traktovki? [Investigative action – the legitimacy of new interpretation]. Lex Russica, 2015, no. 10, pp. 115–127. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2015.107.10.115-
  24. [in Russian].
  25. Smolkova I. V. Netraditsionnye metody rassledovaniya prestuplenii i dokazyvanie [Nontraditional Methods of Investigating Crimes and Proving]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2017, no. 5, pp. 30–34. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29221661 [in Russian].
  26. Khalikov A. N. Sootnoshenie kriminalisticheskikh i protsessual'nykh zadach pri provedenii spetsial'nykh psikhofi ziologicheskikh issledovanii s primeneniem poligrafa [Interrelation of criminalistic and procedural
  27. tasks at carrying out special psychophysiological research with use of the polygraph]. Rossiiskii sledovatel' [Russian Investigator], 2016, no. 4, pp. 12–Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25594631 [in Russian].
  28. Zhigalov N. Yu., Glukhova M. A. O znachenii issledovaniya sudom prisyazhnykh zasedatelei rezul'tatov psikhofiziologicheskoi ekspertizy s ispol'zovaniem poligrafa [On the significance of the study the trial by jury
  29. of the results of psychophysiological examination using a polygraph]. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation], 2018, no. (87), pp. 89–95. Available at: http://vestnikesiirk.ru/images/Arch/2018_487.pdf [in Russian].
  30. Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 07.02.2018 № 41-APU18-1 [Appelate decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of 07.02.2018 № 41-APU18-1]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
  31. Arkhiv Omskogo raionnogo suda Omskoi oblasti. Ugolovnoe delo №1-17/2018 [Archive of the Omsk District Court of the Omsk Region. Criminal case № 1-17/2018]. Available at: https://www.sudact.ru/ regular/doc/zAY3L4hvKaYC [in Russian].
  32. Arkhiv Angarskogo gorodskogo suda Irkutskoi oblasti. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-522/2013 [Archive of the Angarsk city court of the Irkutsk Region. Criminal case № 1-522/2013]. Available at: https://www.sudact.ru/ regular/doc/ 9vsSb55sM0QJ [in Russian].
  33. Arkhiv Zheleznodorozhnogo raionnogo suda g. Ekaterinburga. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-189/2016 [Archive of the Zheleznodorozhny District Court of Yekaterinburg. Criminal case № 1-189/2016]. Available at: https://www.sudact.ru/regular/doc/JoyNjWF3306q [in Russian].
  34. Arkhiv Leninskogo raionnogo suda g. Novosibirska. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-143/2018 [Archive of the Leninsky district court of Novosibirsk. Criminal case № 1-143/2018]. Available at: https://www.sudact. ru/regular/doc/tnLK282fnYdO [in Russian].
  35. Arkhiv Kirenskogo raionnogo suda Irkutskoi oblasti. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-56/2013 [Archive of the Kirensk district court of the Irkutsk Region. Criminal case № 1-56/2013]. Available at: https://www.sudact.ru/ regular/doc/qEqGtibDQiWT [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Popova I.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies