ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF IMPROVING THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE PRE-TRIAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
- Authors: Bagautdinov K.F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Aznakaevsky inter-district investigation department of the criminal investigation division of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in the Republic of Tatarstan
- Issue: Vol 5, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 81-85
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/7122
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2019-5-2-81-85
- ID: 7122
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The mechanism of implementation of the pre-trial agreement on cooperation involves participants
in criminal proceedings both from the prosecution and the defense. However, their role in the pre-trial cooperation agreement is different. The purpose of the study is to identify the role, features of the procedural status of the parties to the pre-trial agreement on cooperation, their interaction to build an optimal model for the implementation of the agreement.
About the authors
K. F. Bagautdinov
Aznakaevsky inter-district investigation department of the criminal investigation division of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in the Republic of Tatarstan
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Baev O. Ya. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: pravovye i kriminalisticheskie problemy, vozmozhnye napravleniya ikh resheniya [Pre-trial cooperation agreement: legal and forensic problems, possible ways to solve them]. М.: Norma; Infra-M, 2013, 208 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19826359 [in Russian].
- Loshkobanova Ya. V. Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo i poterpevshego pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of the suspect, the accused and the victim at the conclusion of the pre-trial cooperation agreement: author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Krasnodar, 2015, 26 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/
- content/obespechenie-prav-i-zakonnykh-interesovpodozrevaemogo-
- obvinyaemogo-i-poterpevshego-prizakl/read [in Russian].
- Fedoseeva E. L. Osobyi poryadok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Special procedure for criminal proceedings in the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement: author’s abstract of Candiadte’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Ekaterinburg, 2014, 24 p. Available at: https://www.docme.ru/doc/1422887/osobyj-poryadok-ugolovnogo-sudoproizvodstva-pri-zaklyuchenii... [in Russian].
- Klimanova O. V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: pravovaya priroda, dogovornye kharakteristiki i problemy kvalifikatsii prestuplenii:
- avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Pre-trial cooperation agreement: legal nature, contractual characteristics and problems of qualifying crimes: author’s abstract of Candiadte’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Samara, 2017,
- p. [in Russian].
- Tertyshnaya O. A. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi mekhanizm dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal procedure mechanism of a pre-trial cooperation agreement: author’s abstract of Candiadte’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Voronezh, 2014, 23 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/ugolovno-protsessualnyi-mekhanizm-dosudebnogo-soglasheniya-o- sotrudnichestve/read [in Russian].
- Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 avgusta 2012 g. po delu № 35-012-15 [Cassational ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of August 29, 2012 with regard to case № 35-012-15]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed 15.05.2018) [in Russian].
- Lukomskaya A. S. Otdel'nye voprosy obespecheniya prav poterpevshego ot ekologicheskogo prestupleniya pri primenenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve [Selected issues of ensuring the rights of the victims of environmental crime in apllying a pre-trial cooperation agreement]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA Russia], 2018, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 103–111. doi: 10.24420/KUI.2018.31.11116 [in Russian].
- Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 aprelya 2011 g. № 33-011-7 [Cassational ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of April 14, 2011 № 33-011-7] [in Russian].
- Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17 maya 2011 g. № 60-011-4 [Cassational ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated May 17, 2011 № 60-011-4] [in Russian].
- Kassatsionnoe opredelenie sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Primorskogo kraevogo suda ot 15 iyunya 2011 g. po delu № 22-3719 [Cassational ruling of the judicial division on criminal cases of the Primorsky Regional Court as of June 15, 2011 with regard to case № 22-3719] [in Russian].
Supplementary files
