CONCEPT OF ADMISSIBILITY AND LIMITS OF RESTRICTIONS OF HUMAN AND CITIZEN’S RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AS THE BASIS OF A TWO-LEVEL SYSTEM FOR REGULATING OF RESPONSIBILITY OF MEMBERS OF POLITICAL PARTIES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article deals with a topical question of law and party regulation of inner-party responsibility. The aim of the article is to develop a theoretical concept of two-level regulation of inner-party responsibility. The author`s concept is based on clause 3 of Article 55 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The article gives a detailed analysis of modern concepts of restriction of rights and freedoms. It generalizes the enforcement practice of clause 3 of Article 55 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation by supreme juridical institutions. It also describes in short the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Theoretical conceptions and enforcement practice are the basis of author’s concept of regulation of inner-party responsibility, which includes two parts. The first part is aimed to find out grounds of admissibility of state intervention into party relations (criteria of validity and necessity). The second part is aimed to find out limits of state intervention (minimum security criteria and preservation of the essence of law criteria).

About the authors

V. E. Mamedova

Department of State and Administrative Law, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Gadzhiev G. A. Printsip pravovoi opredelennosti i rol' sudov v ego obespechenii. Kachestvo zakonov s rossiiskoi tochki zreniia [Principle of legal certainty and its provision by the courts. Quality of laws from Russian viewpoint]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2012, no. 4, pp. 16–28 [in Russian].
  2. Shlink B. Proportsional'nost'. K probleme balansa fundamental'nykh prav i obshchestvennykh tsennostei [Proportionality in the context of the problem of balancing fundamental rights and public goals]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2012, no. 2, pp. 56–77 [in Russian].
  3. Beaty D. M. The Ultimate Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004 [in English].
  4. Alexy R. A. Theory of Constitutional Rights. Transl. by J. Rivers. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002 [in English].
  5. Baglay M. V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Constitutional law of the Russian Federation]. M.: Norma, 2009, 800 p. [in Russian].
  6. Kosla M. Proportsional'nost': posiagatel'stvo na prava cheloveka? Otvet Stavrosu Tsakirakisu [Proportionality: an assault on human rights? A rejoinder to Tsakyrakis Stavros]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2011, no. 5, pp. 58–66 [in Russian].
  7. Rikhter I., Shuppert G. Sudebnaia praktika po administrativnomu pravu [Judicial practice in administrative law]. M.: Iurist", 2000, 300 p. [in Russian].
  8. Jackson V. C. Being Proportional about Proportionality. Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 21, 2004, no. 3 [in English].
  9. Barak A. The Judge in a Democracy. New York: Princeton University Press, 2006 [in English].
  10. Tsakirakis S. Proportsional'nost': posiagatel'stvo na prava cheloveka? [Proportionality: an assault on human rights?]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2011. no. 2, pp. 47–66 [in Russian].
  11. Tsakirakis S. Proportsional'nost': posiagatel'stvo na prava cheloveka? V otvet na stat'iu Madkhava Kosly [Proportionality: an assault on human rights? A reply to Madkhlava Cosla]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2011, no. 5, pp. 67–72 [in Russian].
  12. Kovalev A. A. Mezhdunarodnaia zashchita prav cheloveka: uchebnoe posobie [International Protection of Human Rights: textbook]. M.: Statut, 2013, 591 p. [in Russian].
  13. Kvitko A. F. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy ogranicheniia prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Constitutional and legal bases of restrictions of the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen in the Russian Federation: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. M., 2007 [in Russian].
  14. Podmarev A. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy ogranicheniia prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Constitutional and legal bases of restrictions of the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen in the Russian Federation: author's abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Saratov, 2001 [in Russian].
  15. Belomestnykh L. L. Ogranichenie prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina: teoreticheskii aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Limitation of human and civil rights and freedoms: Theoretical aspect: author's abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. M., 2003 [in Russian].
  16. Kotlyar I. I. Prava cheloveka [Human rights]. Minsk: Tesei, 2002, 256 p. [in Russian].
  17. Vorobyev S. M. Konstitutsionnye osnovy ogranichenii lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav v deiatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Constitutional bases of restrictions of personal non-property rights in the activity of law enforcement bodies: author's abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Yekaterinburg, 2001 [in Russian].
  18. Lapayeva V. V. Pravo grazhdan Rossiiskoi Federatsii na ob"edinenie v politicheskuiu partiiu: osnovaniia i predely ogranicheniia [Russian citizens' right to form a political party: grounds and limits of restriction]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiia [Journal of Constitutional Justice], 2013, no 1, pp. 1–8 [in Russian].
  19. Dvorkin R. O pravakh vser'ez [Talking Rights Seriously]. M.: ROSSPEN, 2004, 392 p. [in Russian].
  20. Lapayeva V. V. Zakonodatel'noe trebovanie k chislennosti politicheskoi partii kak ogranichenie konstitutsionnogo prava na ob"edinenie: kriterii pravomernosti [Legislative requirement to the number of a political party as a restriction of the constitutional right to association: eligibility criteria]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2007, no. 9, pp. 25–34 [in Russian].
  21. Smirnov A. V. K voprosu o kriteriiakh ogranicheniia konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod: printsip kompensatsii [On the issue of criteria for limiting constitutional rights and freedoms: the rules of compensation]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiia [Journal of Constitutional Justice], 2010, no. 1, pp. 15–21 [in Russian].
  22. Morozova L. Ya. Institut ogranicheniia politicheskikh prav i svobod rabotnikov pravookhranitel'nykh organov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Institute for Limiting Political Rights and Freedoms of Law Enforcement Officials in the Russian Federation: author's abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. SPb., 1996 [in Russian].
  23. Lapayeva V. V. Kriterii ogranicheniia prav cheloveka s pozitsii libertarnoi kontseptsii pravoponimaniia [Criteria for limiting human rights from the perspective of the libertarian concept of legal
  24. understanding]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2006, no. 4, pp. 103–[in Russian].
  25. Derevesnikov A. V. Spravedlivost' kak printsip prava: istoriko-teoreticheskii aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Justice as a principle of law: historical and theoretical aspect: author's abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Kostroma, 2005 [in Russian].
  26. Solovyeva A. A. Kategoriia spravedlivosti v pravovom regulirovanii: istoriko-teoreticheskoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Category of justice in legal regulation: historical and theoretical study: author's abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Chelyabinsk, 2006 [in Russian].
  27. Belov S. A. Tsennostnoe obosnovanie reshenii kak proiavlenie sudebnogo aktivizma Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Value-based approach to the argumentation as a form of judicial activism of the Russian Constitutional Court]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review], 2012, no. 2, pp. 140–150 [in Russian].
  28. Dolzhikov A. V. «Gordost' i predubezhdenie»: sorazmernost' polnogo konstitutsionnogo zapreta zakliuchennym golosovat' v Rossii. Postanovlenie Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 4 iiulia 2013 goda [«Pride and prejudice»: proportionality of blanket constitutional ban on the right to vote for detained persons in Russia. Judgment of the European Court of
  29. Human Rights as of July 4, 2013]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International Justice], 2013, no. 4, pp. 11–[in Russian].
  30. Zhelezniak: odnopartiitsy ne podchiniaiutsia Mironovu uzhe davno [Zheleznyak: Party members have not obey Mironov for a long time]. Available at: https://er.ru/news/83113 [in Russian].
  31. Byvshii kandidat v deputaty zaksobraniia kraia ot LDPR osparivaet iskliuchenie sebia iz spiska partii [Ex-candidate for deputies of the Legislative Assembly of the region from the LDPR disputes the expulsion from the party list]. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1828351 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2018 Mamedova V.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies