PROBLEMS OF EXECUTION OF CONCESSION AGREEMENTS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article analyzes the legal nature of concession agreements, the specificity of social orientation of objects transferred under such agreements. The problems of realization of rights of the concessionaire are caused by the legal regime of the real estate object, in particular, the transferred land plot, the sequence of allowing procedures on the part of the concedent, a number of accompanied contracts, terms and other conditions of the concession agreement. Attention is drawn to the forms of concession agreements approved by the Government of the Russian Federation, which emphasize the public component of this contractual structure and, in practice, the impossibility of making changes to their terms. The author considers the definitions of reconstruction, reorganization and re-planning of non-residential premise and non-residential building in connection with transfer of the last under the concession agreement. The conclusion is made that there is no common terminology in various sectors of economy and law, that leads to problems of execution of an obligation under the concession agreement. The problems of labor rights of citizens in the transfer of property complexes under the concession agreement are touched upon.

About the authors

T. B. Zamotaeva

Department of Civil Law and Civil Process, Samara State Oblast Academy (Nayanova)

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Shorokhov S. V. Kontsessionnoe soglashenie kak forma publichnogo upravleniia: sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Concession agreement as a form of public management: comparative and legal research: author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal sciences thesis]. M., 2009, 22 p. [in Russian].
  2. Vinnitsky A. V. Publichnaia sobstvennost’ [Public property]. M.: Statut, 2013. Available at legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
  3. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 29.12.2017 № 1686 «Ob utverzhdenii kriteriev otneseniia ob’’ektov proizvodstva, pervichnoi i (ili) posleduiushchei (promyshlennoi) pererabotki, khraneniia sel’skokhoziaistvennoi produktsii k ob’’ektam kontsessionnogo soglasheniia, soglasheniia o gosudarstvenno-chastnom partnerstve libo munitsipal’no-chastnom partnerstve» [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 29, 2017 № 1686 “On approval of criteria for classifying production objects, primary and (or) subsequent (industrial) processing, storage of agricultural products to the objects of concession agreement, agreements on public–private partnership or municipal-private partnership”]; Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF dated 04.03.2017 № 259 «Ob utverzhdenii pravil provedeniia monitoringa zakliucheniia i realizatsii zakliuchennykh kontsessionnykh soglashenii, v tom chisle na predmet sobliudeniia storonami kontsessionnogo soglasheniia vziatykh na sebia obiazatel’stv po dostizheniiu tselevykh pokazatelei, soderzhashchikhsia v kontsessionnom soglashenii, srokov ikh realizatsii, ob’’ema privlekaemykh investitsii i inykh sushchestvennykh uslovii kontsessionnogo soglasheniia» [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 04.03.2017 № 259 “On approval of the Rules for monitoring the conclusion and implementation of concluded concession agreements, including for compliance by the parties with the concession agreement undertaken to achieve the targets contained in the concession agreement, terms of their implementation, volume of attracted investments and other essential terms of the concession agreement»]. Available at: www.pravo.gov. ru [in Russian].
  4. Pis’mo FAS Rossii ot 05.10.2015 № AD/53812/15 «O vozmozhnosti zakrepleniia na prave khoziaistvennogo vedeniia za munitsipal’nymi
  5. predpriiatiiami takogo vida munitsipal’nogo imushchestva kak setei vodosnabzheniia i teplosnabzheniia» [Letter of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia dated 10.2015 № AD/53812/15 “On the possibility of securing the municipal enterprises with the type of municipal property such as water supply and heating networks”]. Zhurnal rukovoditelia i glavnogo bukhgaltera ZhKKh [Magazine of the head and chief accountant of housing and public utilities], no. 1, January 2016 (Part II) [in Russian].
  6. Popov A. I. Problemy administrativno-dogovornogo regulirovaniia kontsessionnykh soglashenii [Problems of administrative and contractual regulation of concession agreements]. Administrativnoe pravo i process
  7. [Administrative Law and Procedure], 2015, no. 8, pp. 43–[in Russian].
  8. Mulyavin M. K. Soglashenie o razdele produktsii:grazhdansko-pravovye priznaki i pravovye osnovy zakliucheniia: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Production sharing agreement: civil-law signs and legal bases of conclusion: author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal sciences thesis]. Kazan, 2007, 26 p. [in Russian].
  9. Vakhtinskaya I. S. Sootnoshenie publichno-pravovykh i chastnopravovykh nachal v kontsessionnom soglashenii [Ratio of public and private-law beginnings in the concession agreement]. Zakonodatel’stvo [Legislation], 2007, no. 8, pp. 37–41. Available at: http://www.garant.ru/ company/garant-press/lawm/10993/ [in Russian].
  10. Zhemaletdinov R. M. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie kontsessionnykh soglashenii: monografiia [Civil-law regulation of concession agreements: monograph]. M., 2013, 192 p. [in Russian].
  11. Naletov K. I. Eshche raz o pravovoi prirode kontsessionnogo soglasheniia [Once again about the legal nature of concession agreement]. Pravo i politika [Law and Politics], 2005, no. 3, pp. 28–36 [in Russian].
  12. Shirokov S. N. Pravovaia sushchnost’ kontsessionnogo soglasheniia: avtoref. dis....kand.iurid. nauk [Legal essence of concession agreement: author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal sciences thesis]. Chelyabinsk, 2012, 31 p. [in Russian].
  13. Ofitsial’nye terminy i opredeleniia v stroitel’stve, arkhitekture i zhilishchno-kommunal’nom komplekse [Official terms and definitions in construction, architecture and housing-and-communal complex]. M.: FGUP «VNIINTPI», 3rd edition (as amended), 2006, 275 р. [in Russian].
  14. Dubinchina S. V. Sushchestvennye usloviia kontsessionnykh soglashenii: chto vazhno uchityvat’ pri formulirovanii uslovii dolgosrochnykh obiazatel’stv storon [Essential conditions of concession agreements: what is important to consider when formulation of conditions of long-term obligations of the parties]. [Property Relations in
  15. the Russian Federation], 2017, no. 10, pp. 87–Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30295426 [in Russian].
  16. Pis’mo Minstroya Rossii ot 20.01.2016 № 1055-ACH/04 «O zakreplenii za gosudarstvennymi i munitsipal’nymi unitarnymi predpriyatiyami ob» yektov kommunal’nogo khozyaystva» [Letter of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated January 20, 2016 No. 1055- ACh/04 “On securing public utilities facilities to state and municipal unitary enterprises”]. Zhurnal rukovoditelia i glavnogo bukhgaltera ZhKKh [Magazine of the head and chief accountant of housing and public utilities], no. 5, May 2016 (part II) [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Zamotaeva T.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies