THE PROBLEM OF IMPROPER IDENTIFICATION BY THE COURTS OF THEIR TASKS FROM PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS
- Authors: Mironova M.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of criminal process and criminalistics, Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 3, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 192-195
- Section: Tribune of young scientist
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/6071
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2017-3-4-192-195
- ID: 6071
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The court in the adversarial process cannot and must not assume the exercise of neither accusatory nor defensive functions, the court proceeds to trial only if the allegations made by the party prosecuting, and resolves it within the charge. The accusatory bias caused by the identification of the court's objectives with those of the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings (conviction of the perpetrator of the crime, including by collecting sufficient evidence). Guilt is predetermined by the shape and structure of the modern Russian criminal process that is not fully competitive.
About the authors
M. A. Mironova
Department of criminal process and criminalistics, Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Berezin A.A. Zashchita prav grazhdan advokatom v ugolovnom
- protsesse [Protection of citizens’ rights by the lawyer in the criminal
- process]. M.: Statut, 2014, p. [in Russian].
- Teoriia ugolovnogo protsessa: sostiazatel’nost’. Chast’ 1. Pod red. N.A. Kolokolova [Theory of criminal process: adversarial system. Part 1. N.A. Kolokolov (Ed.]. M.: Iurlitinform, 2013, 368 p. [in Russian].
- Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo: teoriia i praktika. Otv. red. N.A. Kolokolov [Criminal procedure: theory and practice. N.A. Kolokolov
- (Ed.)]. M.: Iurait, 2011, p. [in Russian].
- Bednyakov I.L. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo: ot Kontseptsii sudebnoi
- reformy k sovremennosti [Pre-trial proceedings: from the Concept of judicial reform to the present time]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo
- [Criminal Judicial Proceeding], 2017, no. 1, pp. 26–[in Russian].
- Lazareva V.A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse. Uchebnoe posobie dlia magistrov [Prosecutor in the criminal process. Study guide for Master’s students]. M.: Iurait, 2012, 295 p. [in Russian].
- Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse. Uchebnik [Proof in criminal process. Tutorial]. M.: Iurait, 2014, 359 p. [in Russian].
- Plashevskaya A.A. Sobiranie sudom dokazatel’stv pri rassmotrenii dela po pervoi instantsii v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: dis.... kand. iurid. nauk [Gathering by the court of evidences in the proceedings at first instance in criminal proceedings of Russia: Candidate’s of Laws thesis]. Tomsk, 2006, 203 p. [in Russian].
- Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Sistematicheskii kommentarii. Stat’i 595–764. Pod red. M.N. Gernet [Regulations of Criminal Proceedings. A systematic review. Articles 595–764. M.N. Gernet (Ed.)]. M., 1915, Vol. 4, 1277 p. [in Russian].
- Babinkov A.M. Konstitutsionnyi printsip sostiazatel’nosti i ravnopraviia storon pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiia: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Constitutional principle of competitiveness and equality of the parties in the administration of justice: author’s abstract of Candifate’s of Laws thesis]. M., 2004, 24 p. [in Russian].
- Romanov S.V. Protsessual’naia aktivnost’ suda v sudebnom
- razbiratel’stve po ugolovnomu delu: sravnitel’no-pravovoi i
- pravozashchitnyi aspekty [Procedural activity of the court in the proceedings in a criminal case: comparative legal and human rights aspects]. Zakon [Law], 2016, no. 1, pp. 39–[in Russian].
- Chupilkin Yu.B. Poroki rossiiskogo ugolovnogo pravosudiia XXI v. [Defects of Russian criminal justice of the XXI century]. Istoriia gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law], 2015, no. 4, pp. 32–35 [in Russian].
- Petrukhin I.L. Opravdatel’nyi prigovor i pravo na reabilitatsiiu [The aquittal and the right to rehabilitation]. M.: Prospekt, 2009, 192 p. [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02.07.2013 № 16-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chasti pervoi stat’i 237 Ugolovno-protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sviazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B.T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda» [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Russia dated 02.07.2013 № 16-P «On the check of constitutionality of provisions of Part one of Article 237 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan B.T. Gadaev and request of Kurgan Regional Court»] [in Russian].
Supplementary files
