INTERROGATION OF THE ACCUSED AT A SPECIAL ORDER TRIAL (CHAPTER 40 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
- Authors: Sayushkina E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Orenburg State Agrarian University
- Issue: Vol 2, No 4 (2016)
- Pages: 101-104
- Section: Tribune of young scientist
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/5063
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2016-2-4-101-104
- ID: 5063
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article investigates the problem of questioning of the
defendant at the specific order of the trial. According to the author,
a radical transformation of this procedure is possible through the
introduction of interrogation of the defendant.
About the authors
E. V. Sayushkina
Orenburg State Agrarian University
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru
References
- Bakanova A.A. Formirovanie i postanovlenie prigovora pri osobom poriadke sudebnogo razbiratel’stva [Formation and sentencing at special procedure of litigation]. Rossiiskii sud’ia
- [Russian Judge], 2008, no. 6, pp. 19–[in Russian].
- Boyarskaya A.V. Dokazyvanie v uproshchennykh sudebnykh proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Proving in simplified judicial proceedings of the criminal process of Russia: Authors abstract of Candidates of Law thesis]. Tomsk, 2012, 22 p. [in Russian].
- Vinnitsky L.V., Melnik S.L. Sovershenstvovanie osobogo poriadka sudebnogo razbiratel’stva [Improvement of the special procedure of litigation]. Zakonnost [Legitimacy], 2015, no.7, pp. 39–43 [in Russian].
- Karetnikov A. Nuzhen li osobyi poriadok sudebnogo rassmotreniia ugolovnykh del v otnoshenii lits, zakliuchivshikh dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve? [Do we need a special procedure of judicial consideration of criminal cases with regard to people who made the plea deal?]. Zakonnost
- [Legitimacy], 2013, no. 10, pp. 27–[in Russian].
- Kachalova O.V. Uskorennoe proizvodstvo v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse: dis. … d-ra iurid. nauk [Fast track procedure in the Russian criminal process: Doctors of Law thesis]. М., 2016, 482 p. [in Russian].
- Lagutkina N.B. Osobyi poriadok priniatiia sudebnogo resheniia pri soglasii obviniaemogo s pred”iavlennym obvineniem [Special procedure of adoption of judicial decision upon the plea of guilty]. Nauka i sovremennosti [Science and modernity], 2013, no. 21, pp. 256262 [in Russian].
- Petrukhin I.L. Kontseptual’nye osnovy reformy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Conceptual foundations of the reform of criminal procedure]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2002, no. 5, pp. 17–29 [in Russian].
- Piyuk A.V. Nekotorye problemy osobogo poriadka razresheniia ugolovnykh del [Some problems
- of the special procedure of settlement of criminal cases]. Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessual’nye
- kriminalisticheskie chteniia [Siberian criminal and procedural and criminalistic readings], 2016,
- no. 2(, pp. 29–37 [in Russian].
- Khomyakova V.V. Dopros podsudimogo v sisteme protsessual’nykh sredstv zashchity ot obvineniia: razumnyi kompromiss [Examination in the system of procedural forms of protection against the accusation: reasonable compromise]. Terra Economicus, 2014, Vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 264–267 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
