RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN EVIDENCE LAW IN THE INFORMATION AGE: CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW ASPECT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the article modern tendencies in Russian and American evidence law that are determined by appearance of informational technologies are viewed. Special attention is paid to the digital evidence conception as promising direction for legal research. Peculiar characteristics of digital devices (such as great volume of memory, data copying simplicity, unobviousness and content relativity, remote access to information) are defined by the author for making new models of personal criminal procedural activity, that enhance level of legal protection against public agencies unreasonable intrusion into private life. Also author briefly describes state of Russian legal science in order to define its incompliance
with social realia, speed of technological progress and conclude that additional research in sphere of privacy is required for making law-enforcement activity more effective.

About the authors

R. I. Okonenko

Moscow City Court

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov.sv@ssau.ru

assistant judge

Russian Federation

References

  1. Sheyfer S.A. Evidences and proving in criminal cases. M., 2012, 238 p. [in Russian].
  2. Dolya E.A. Formation of evidence on the basis of results of operational and search activity. M., 2013, 373 p. [in Russian].
  3. Lisichenko V.K. Kriminalisticheskoe issledovanie dokumentov (pravovye i metodologicheskie problemy): dis. … d-ra iurid. nauk [Forensic processing of documents (legal and methodological problems): Doctor’s of Law thesis]. Kiev, 1973, 427 p. [in Russian].
  4. Kushnirenko S.P., Panfilova E.I. Criminally-remedial methods of seizure of computer information with regard to economic crimes. SPb., 1997, 88 p. [in Russian].
  5. Vehov V.B. Work with digital evidences in conditions of changed criminal procedure legislation. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian investigator], 2013, no. 10, pp. 22–24 [in Russian].
  6. Zuev S.V. Digital copying of information – Criminal Procedure Code regulation. Zakonnost’ [Legitimacy], 2013, no. 8, pp. 22–23 [in Russian].
  7. Electronic evidence: third edition. S. Mason (Ed.). Croydon, 2012, 934 p. [in English].
  8. Kessler G.C. Judge’ Awareness, Understanding, and Application of Digital Evidence. Miami, 2010, 182 p. [in English].
  9. Legotin E.U. Organization of metadata in data storage. Nauchnyi poisk. Tekhnicheskie nauki: materialy tret’ei nauch. konf. aspirantov i doktorantov [Scientific inquiry. Engineering sciences: materials of the third scientific conference of postgraduate students and doctoral students]. Chelyabinsk, Izdatel’stvo Iuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, Vol. 2, pp. 128–
  10. [in Russian].
  11. Adam M.G. The iphone meets the fourth amendment. UCLA Law Review, 2008, Vol. 27, pp. 27–58 [in English].
  12. Kerr O.S. Search warrants in an era of digital evidence. Mississippi Law Journal, 2005, December, pp. 85–145 [in English].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Okonenko R.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies