ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCESS OF COMMON LAW COUNTRIES
- Authors: Erpylev I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Институт законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве РФ
- Issue: Vol 1, No 1 (2015)
- Pages: 39-43
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/4892
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2015-1-1-39-43
- ID: 4892
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article analyzes the understanding of admissibility of evidence of criminal procedure in science and legislation of Anglo-Saxon legal family countries; some common features of the approach to the admissibility of evidence in criminal process of these states are also disclosed.
About the authors
I. V. Erpylev
Институт законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве РФ
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenov.sv@ssau.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Bodenheimer E., Oakley J.B., Love J.C. An introduction to the Anglo-American legal system. 2004.
- Marchenko M.N. Legal systems of contemporary world. M., 2009 [in Russian].
- Oxford dictionary of Law. 5th edition. Oxford, University press, 2003.
- West’s encyclopedia of American Law. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Detroit, Thomson Gale, 2004
- R vs Lewis. [1979]. 2 S. C.R. 821.
- Gans J., Palmer A. Australian Principles of Evidence. 2nd ed. Coogee, 2004.
- McDermott P.A. Criminal Procedure and Evidence. Criminal Justice in Ireland. Paul O’Mahony (Ed.). Dublin, 2002.
- Seetahal Dana S. Commonwealth Carribean Criminal Practice and Procedure. 3rd ed. Abingdon, 2011.
- Crime and the Criminal Justice System in Israel: Assessing the Knowledge Base toward the 21st Century. Robert R. Friedmann (Ed.). N.Y., 1998.
- Aptekman A. Criminal law of Israel. Isradon, 2006 [in Russian].
- Protection of Human Rights in African Criminal Proceedings. M. 12. Cherif Bassiouni and Ziyad Motala (Ed.). Dordrecht, 1995
- Federal Rules of Evidence. Act of Jan. 2, 1975, Pub. Law, no 93. 595 p.
- Keane A. The Modern Law of Evidence. 7th ed. Oxford, 2008.
Supplementary files
