Cite item

Full Text


In the article the basic approaches to the economic theory of proposal are presented, the analysis of regulations of study is carried out, comparison with “classics” and “neoclassics” is carried out, advantages and disadvantages of the given theory in the light of classical directions of economic science are shown. The views of leading economists of the theory of proposal are viewed. The author carried out systematization of scientific knowledge of the given theory on the basis of methodological directions, explanations on researches of the basic concepts of theory are given.

About the authors

N. M. Tyukavkin

the Dept. of Economy, Samara State University, Samara, 443011, Russian Federation.

Author for correspondence.

A. A. Tarelkin

the Dept. of General and Strategic Management, Samara State University, Samara, 443011, Russian Federation.



  1. Blaug M. Economic thought in retrospect. M., Delo Ltd., 1994. [in Russian]
  2. History of Economic Thought. Avtonomova V.A., Anan’ina O.V., Makasheva N.A. (eds.). M., INFRA-M, 2002. [in Russian]
  3. History of Economic Thought (modern stage). Hudokormov A.G. (ed.). M., INFRA-M, 2004.
  4. Moiseev S.R. The Rise and Fall of Monetarism. Voprosy ekonomiki [Problems of Economics]. 2002, no. 9. [in Russian]
  5. Otmahov P.V. The concept of method of Milton Friedman. Vestnik MGU, Ser. Ekonomika [Vestnik of MGU, Economy Series], 1992, no. 4, pp. 59–63. [in Russian]
  6. Ryzhov I.V. History of Economic Thought: schoolbook. M., Perspektiva, 2004, pp. 112–118. [in Russian]
  7. Seligmen B.A. Main Currents in Modern Economic Thought. M., Infra Press, 1968. [in Russian]
  8. Tyukavkin N.M. Analysis of investment risks in the activity of a company. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University]. 2013, no. 1, pp. 151–156. [in Russian]
  9. Tyukavkin N.M. Strategic direction of development of subjects of market economy. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii [Journal of economic theory]. 2007, no. 3.
  10. Tyukavkin N.M. Strategic effectiveness of an activity of a company. Audit i finansovyi analiz [Audit and Financial Analysis], 2007, no. 5.
  11. Furubotn E.G., Richter R. Institutions and Economic Theory: Achievements of New Institutional Economics. Transl. from Eng. ed. by V.S. Kat’kalo, N.P. Drozdova. SPb., Izdat. Dom St. Petersburg. Gos. Un-ta, 2005, pp. 41–45. [in Russian]
  12. Friedman M. Quantity theory of money. M., Elf-Press, 1996. [in Russian]
  13. Friedman M. Methodology of Positive Economics. M., THESIS, 1994, v. II, ed. 4, pp. 167–169. [in Russian]
  14. Schumpeter I.A. Theory of Economic Development. M., Progress, 1982. [in Russian]
  15. Hansen E. Economic cycles and national income. (Part IV. Economic cycles and public policy). M., Ekonomika, 1992. [in Russian]
  16. Yadgarov Ya.S. History of Economic Thought: a textbook for high schools. 4th ed. M., INFRA-M, 2006. [in Russian]
  17. Barzel Y. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. Cambridge, 1989, no. 28.
  18. Coase R.H. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago and London, 1988, p. 119 (Russian translation.: R. Coase firm, the market and the right. M., 1993).
  19. Demsetz H. Efficiency, Competition, and Policy. Oxford, 1988, vol. I–II, p. 113.
  20. North C. Structure and Change in Economic History. N.Y., 1981.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files

Copyright (c) 2018 Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Management

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies