Author Guidelines
1) The author (or one of the co-authors on behalf of the author's team) registers on the journal's website and sends to the editorial office an article prepared in accordance with the Instructions for preparation of articles for the journal "ONTOLOGY OF PROJECTING" (see "Requirements" on the journal's website).
2) The article submitted to the editorial office is entered into the Register of received articles with a unique registration number, and the author is informed about it not later than 10 days from the moment of sending the article on the website of the journal.
The sent materials are considered as private property of the authors and are qualified by the Editorial Board and Executive Editorial Board of the Journal as non-disclosable information (third-party reviewers of the articles are also notified about it).
3) All incoming materials corresponding to the subject of the Journal are subjected to peer review for the purpose of their expert evaluation. The Executive Editorial Board guarantees that all involved reviewers are recognised experts on the subject of the reviewed materials and have publications on the subject of the reviewed article within the last 3 years. The reviews are stored in the publishing house "New Technology" and in the editorial office of the journal for 5 years.
4) Prior to the main reviewing procedure, the Executive Editorial Board gives a preliminary assessment of the conformity of the article content to the theme of the journal and the quality of design of the submitted materials.
The Editor-in-Chief has the right to reject the article as non-compliant with the subject of the journal with notification of the author within 10 days.
The author, whose materials were designed with significant violations of the Instructions for the preparation of articles, on behalf of the Executive Editorial Board may be offered to bring the design of the article in accordance with the established requirements before its substantive review. Comments and recommendations on changes in the design are brought to the author's attention in the form of notes added to the file with the text of the article using the "Reviewing" toolbar of MS Word.
5) The abstract of the article accepted by the Executive Editorial Board for reviewing is sent to each member of the Editorial Board for information and with an offer to become a reviewer, to give private feedback and recommendations on the article, or to recommend to the Executive Editorial Board a specialist for reviewing.
6) Within 10 days from the moment of registration the article is sent to at least two reviewers from among the members of the Editorial Board who expressed their desire to become reviewers or who are specialists on the issues touched upon in the article. In agreement with the members of the Editorial Board, the article may be sent to external reviewers with appropriate qualifications.
7) Articles whose author or co-author is a full member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as articles that have been submitted to scientific, scientific-technical, scientific-methodological and methodological councils of scientific organisations and higher educational institutions and have written Conclusions of the council with a recommendation to publish are not reviewed. A footnote is made in the title of the article about the presence of such written conclusions.
The author is obliged to submit this conclusion to the Executive Editorial Board. The Conclusions are stored in the publishing house "Novaya Tekhnika" and in the Executive Editorial Board for 5 years, and the Executive Editorial Board undertakes to send copies of the Conclusions to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation when the Executive Editorial Board receives a corresponding request.
8) The reviewer within 10 days makes a conclusion on the possibility of publishing the article.
The reviewer should use a specially designed form, which can be downloaded from the journal's website (see section "Requirements").
The reviewer is recommended to work with the electronic version of the article in the "Reviewing" mode of MS Word, inserting into the file with the test of the article his/her notes with evaluations and comments on the content and design of the article.
9) The Editorial Board of the Journal sends copies of reviews or a motivated refusal of publication to the authors of the submitted materials, and also undertakes to send copies of reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation when the Editorial Board receives a corresponding request.
10) If the review of the article contains indications on the need for correction, the article is sent to the author for revision.
In case of a negative review, by decision of the Executive Editorial Board, the article may be sent for additional review.
11) In case of disagreement with the reviewer's opinion, the author of the article has the right to provide a reasoned response to the Editorial Board.
12) The final decision on the expediency of publication after reviewing is made by the Editor-in-Chief.
13) In case of a favourable conclusion on publication, the Executive Editorial Board determines the order of publication depending on the subject matter of the journal issues.
14) The Executive Editorial Board does not assume any obligations on the publication deadlines.
